Event 201 Pandemic Exercise: Highlights Reel (November 4, 2019)
Selected moments from the Event 201 pandemic tabletop exercise hosted by The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY. The exercise illustrated the pandemic preparedness efforts needed to diminish the large-scale economic and societal consequences of a severe pandemic. Drawing from actual events, Event 201 identifies important policy issues and preparedness challenges that could be solved with sufficient political will and attention.
Bill Gates and other elitists claim that their plans will reduce global poverty. And they will, but not in the way they would have you believe. The elitists plan to reduce global poverty by eliminating the poor in the world through vaccines, control of the global food supply, GMOs, control over growing your own food, control of vitamins and herbal supplements, control of clean water, control of health care, and control of cheap forms of energy. If you think this won't affect you, just remember that the gap between rich and poor is growing rapidly until one day soon there will be only the rich and the poor, and you will be the next target for elimination. The power elite want to reduce the world's population down to 500 million — chances are, you're not one of their chosen few.
Bill Gates has a warning about deadly epidemics (January 22, 2017, Business Insider)
In the video below, Bill Gates is talking about himself, the bioterrorist. He's not even afraid to tell us what’s coming next. Pandemic 2 is going to be more lethal. Here's a man threatening to wipe us out and nothing is being done about it. "Give man enough power and he will believe he is a god."
Steven Colbert asked Bill Gates:
"Well, Bill, since you tried to warn us (at the TED Talk in 2015) about this pandemic and we didn't listen, what's the next thing you're warning us about that's going to happen?"
May 2019—a U.S. government body detailed steps we must undergo to ensure a technological advantage over China, particularly in their use of mass surveillance. Many of the steps are currently being promoted and implemented as part of the government’s response to the COVID-19 "crisis" (first case of the novel coronavirus was in Wuhan, China, November 2019).
Quantum dot tags are semiconducting nanoparticles. They fluoresce after they're injected during a vaccination. Due to unique electronic properties, applications include solar cells, transistors, LEDs, medical imaging. Magnetic nanoparticles can carry drugs through the bloodstream.
With this technology, Bill Gates can embed vaccines and medical records directly into the skin, visible only using a special smartphone camera app and filter. The technology would enable instant tracking and access to a person’s medical history.
On The Ellen Show, Bill Gates said (around 5:20 mark in video below):
“We want to get into this semi-normal phase whenever we can and then the vaccine is the thing that will change things and that’s why [we need to] figure out how to make sure it’s safe because when you give it to 7 billion healthy people...”
Electronic devices, such as mobile phones, emit electromagnetic radiation with high frequencies from 300 MHz to 300 GHz. High-energy radiation causes a thermal effect that may increase the temperature of tissues and organs and also cause serious damage to cells.
60 GHz is absorbed by oxygen, the most abundant and arguably most important element to all of biological life. Shouldn't this be headline news that stops everything until we deeply test the implications of 5th generation technology (5G) for cellular networks?
The U.S. government has granted liability immunity for manufacturers and healthcare providers tasked with producing, distributing and administering COVID-19 countermeasures. Negligence cases involving vaccines, treatments, etc. will be barred from state and federal civil courts.
PREP Act: Anything that has been created under the Public Health Emergency alert, like we are right now, gives the pharmaceutical companies complete and utter liability protection for any pill, IV, product, biologic, vaccine, software, technology—anything called a countermeasure. So this vaccine that is being fast-tracked (approved within six months when generally the minimum is five years, and up to 15 or 20 years), they will have complete liability protection, even if kills or maims tens of millions of people. The only way you can have any recourse against that injury is if you appeal to your US Attorney General, and convince him that this was done under an act of willful misconduct; and that, of course, is not going to happen. - Dr. Sherri Tenpenny (video below)
This is why Bill Gates wants indemnity…
A Virtual World: The New Normal (May 4, 2020, Jeremiah Cohen)
Bill Gates—“Gene editing could help humanity overcome some of the biggest and most persistent challenges in global health and development.” By 2023, the market is expected to reach $5 billion. Studies suggest gene editing could increase the risk of cancer.
Rising prevalence of cancer increases the demand for targeted gene therapy and proves beneficial for the industry growth. Some of the major industry players in genome editing market are Plant Engineers of genetically-modified (GM) crops and Biotech and Pharma companies.
Sara Cunial, Member of Parliament for Rome, denounced Bill Gates and urged the Italian President to hand him over to the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity. Gates plans to vaccinate and mark the human race with quantum tattoos (ID2020).
Below is the transcription of the full speech delivered to the Italian Parliament by Sara Cunial, the Member of Parliament for Rome, on the government's response to COVID-19.
Hobbes said that absolute power does not come from an imposition from above but by the choice of individuals who feel more protected renouncing to their own freedom and granting it to a third party.
With this, you are going on anesthetizing the minds with corrupted Mass Media with Amuchina (a brand of disinfectant promoted by Mass Media) and NLP, with words like “regime”, “to allow” and “to permit”, to the point of allowing you to regulate our emotional ties and feelings and certify our affects.
So, in this way, Phase 2 is nothing else than the persecution/continuation of Phase 1 – you just changed the name, as you did with the European Stability Mechanism (ESM). We have understood people, for sure, don’t die for the virus alone.
So people will be allowed to die and suffer, thanks to you and your laws, for misery and poverty.
And, as in the “best” regimes, the blame will be dropped only on citizens.
You take away our freedom and say that we looked for it. Divide et Impera (Divide and Rule).
It is our children who will lose more, who are ‘raped souls’, with the help of the so-called “guarantor of their rights” and of CISMAI (Italian Coordination of Services against Child Abuse).
In this way, the right to school will be granted only with a bracelet to get them used to probation, to get them used to slavery – involuntary treatment and to virtual lager. All this in exchange for a push-scooter and a tablet. All to satisfy the appetites of a financial capitalism whose driving force is the conflict of interest, conflict well represented by the WHO, whose main financier is the well-known “philanthropist and savior of the world” Bill Gates.
We all know it, now. Bill Gates, already in 2018, predicted a pandemic, simulated in October 2019 at the “Event 201”, together with Davos (Switzerland). For decades, Gates has been working on depopulation policy and dictatorial control plans on global politics, aiming to obtain the primacy on agriculture, technology and energy.
Gates said, I quote exactly from his speech:
“If we do a good job on vaccines, health and reproduction, we can reduce the world population by 10-15%. Only a genocide can save the world”.
With his vaccines, Gates managed to sterilize millions of women in Africa.
With his vaccines, Gates caused a polio epidemic that paralyzed 500,000 children in India.
And, still today, with the DTP vaccine [a combination vaccine for diphtheria, tetanus, and polio], Gates causes more deaths than the disease itself.
And he does the same with GMOs designed by Monsanto and “generously donated” to needy populations.
All this while he is already thinking about distributing the quantum tattoo for vaccination recognition and mRNA vaccines as tools for reprogramming our immune system.
In addition, Gates also does business with several multinationals that own 5G facilities in the USA.
On this table there is the entire Deep State in Italian sauce: Sanofi, together with GlaxoSmithKline are friends of the Ranieri Guerra, Ricciardi, and of the well-known virologist that we pay 2000 Euro every 10 minutes for the presentations on Rai (Italian state TV— Burioni). Sanofi and GlaxoSmithKline sign agreements with medical societies to indoctrinate future doctors, making fun of their autonomy of judgment and their oath.
Hi-Tech multinationals, like the Roman Engineering, which is friend of the noble Mantoan, or Bending Spoons of Pisano, which are there for control and management of our personal health data in agreement with the European Agenda ID2020 of electronic identification, which aims to use mass vaccination to obtain a platform of digital identity. This is a continuation of the transfer of data started by Renzi to IBM. Renzi, in 2016, gave a plus 30% to Gates Global Fund.
On the Deep State table, there are the people of Aspen, like the Saxon Colao, who with his four-page reports, paid 800 Euros/hour, with no scientific review, dictates its politics as a Bilderberg general as he is, staying away from the battlefield. The list is long. Very long. In the list there is also Mediatronic by Arcuri, and many more.
The Italian contribution to the International Alliance Against Coronavirus will be of 140 million Euros, of which 120 million Euros will be given to GAVI Alliance, the non-profit by Gates Foundation.
They are just a part of the 7.4 billion Euro fund by the EU to find a vaccine against Coronavirus – vaccines which will be used as I said before.
No money, of course for serotherapy, which has the collateral effect of being super cheap. No money for prevention, a real prevention, which includes our lifestyles, our food and our relationship with the environment.
The real goal of all of this is total control. Absolute domination of human beings, transformed into guinea pigs and slaves, violating sovereignty and free will. All this thanks to tricks/hoax disguised as political compromises, while you rip up the Nuremberg code with involuntary treatment, fines and deportation, facial recognition and intimidation, endorsed by dogmatic scientism—protected by our “Multi-President” of the Republic, who is real cultural epidemic of this country.
We, with the people, will multiply the fires of resistance in a way that you won’t be able to repress all of us.
I ask you, President, to be the spokesperson and give an advice to our President Conte: Dear Mr. President Conte, next time you receive a phone call from the philanthropist Bill Gates forward it directly to the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity. If you won’t do this, tell us how we should define you, the “friend lawyer” who takes orders from a criminal.
What do you really know about Bill Gates?
Let’s see … he co-founded Microsoft and has billions of dollars. According to Wikipedia, Gates is “an American business magnate, software developer, investor, and philanthropist.”
United States v. Microsoft: Deposition by Bill Gates, Part 1
You might have heard that Gates recently resigned from the board of Microsoft to focus full time on “philanthropy” and also “global health and vaccines.”
Sounds like a great guy!
But exactly what qualifications does the founder of a trillion-dollar software behemoth have to be a leader in “global health and vaccines”?
Nevertheless, the mainstream media “teleprompter readers” (sorry, I meant “anchors”) were thrilled, especially in light of the February announcement that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation was committing an additional $100 million to fight COVID-19.
THE BILL & MELINDA GATES FOUNDATIONThe BMGF is the world’s largest private foundation with more than $50 billion in assets. It is the second largest donor to the WHO next to the U.S. government.
But have you ever wondered how and why the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) came into being?
Were you aware that the BMGF was originally created to help “gloss over” Bill’s shredded reputation during Microsoft’s antitrust trial in the late 1990s?
You see, Microsoft was accused of trying to create a monopoly that led to the collapse of rival Netscape by giving its browser software for free. During the 18 month trial which began in May 1998, Gates gave hours of videotaped testimony in which he was transparently evasive, pompous, and egotistical. You can watch the testimony here, if you have the stomach to watch Gates for a prolonged period of time.
During the deposition, he regularly gave nebulous and ambiguous answers and muttered “I don’t recall” so many times that even the presiding judge had to snicker. He also made a long list of claims that would soon be directly refuted in court by comparison to his own emails. (TRANSLATION: Gates lied … A LOT)
Throughout the trial, Gates and Microsoft took a public relations beating, so they began what was referred to as a “charm offensive” aimed at improving their image. It was during this time that Gates discovered the “wonders of charitable giving.” (wink wink) Remember … billionaire-funded “philanthropy” is usually a PR scam.
The fact of the matter is that between the beginning of the trial and the verdict, Gates contributed $20.3 billion (yes, that’s BILLION) to the BMGF. According to Ken Auletta, author of the 2001 book World War 3.0: Microsoft and Its Enemies, the contributions “became part of Microsoft’s PR effort to humanize Gates.” In other words, Gates used the donations to help “rebrand” his name as a philanthropist, when in actuality the donations were nothing more than a fig leaf to rebuild his reputation of being a ruthless, predatory, condescending, ruling-class jerk. And the mainstream media was more than happy to help spit-shine his reputation as a “generous benefactor of humanity” instead of a petty, bullying scumbag.
Between 2002 and 2012, Gates sold an estimated $22 billion in Microsoft stock but contributed only $3.7 billion of that to the BMGF. That’s less than 20%. Let’s just say Bill wasn’t too worried about “food money” or “paying the rent” with the remaining $18.3 billion.
GATES, GMOs & GEOENGINEERINGIn 2006, the BMGF donated $100 million and formed an alliance with the Rockefeller Foundation to help spur a “green revolution” in Africa, with a major focus being to encourage the use of pesticides and “advanced” (i.e. GMO) seeds.
In 2010, the BMGF purchased 500,000 shares in Monsanto, the world’s largest producer of GMO food as well as pesticides like glyphosate (Roundup), making it abundantly clear that this so-called benevolent charity is up to something other than eradicating disease and feeding the world’s poor.
Since 2015, the BMGF has donated a total of $15 million to two global campaigns aimed at “ending world hunger” by encouraging small farmers around the world to use GMOs.
Interestingly, while the BMGF is heavily promoting GMO to farmers, at the same time it’s investing in the ‘Doomsday Crop Diversity Vault,’ a seed bank located in Norway. Other investors include the Norwegian government, the Rockefeller Foundation, and major GMO seed and agrichemical companies.
Food for thought … Why is the BMGF pushing GMO seeds (which destroy the plant seed varieties) while at the same time investing tens of millions of dollars to preserve every seed variety known in a bomb-proof doomsday vault near the remote Arctic Circle “so that crop diversity can be conserved for the future”? Think about it.
Since 2007, Gates has been personally funding and closely involved in the Fund for Innovative Climate and Energy Research (FICER), based at Harvard University, which carries out research into the possibility of blocking the sun in order to mitigate global warming, using chemicals or particles of metals such as aluminum.
In 2012 FICER announced their intention to spray sun-reflecting sulphate particles into the atmosphere to artificially cool the planet, and they also contemplated using aluminum for the same purpose.
That’s right, it’s no longer a “conspiracy theory” folks. Those ‘criss cross’ lines in the sky aren’t funny shaped clouds and they aren’t normal exhaust from planes. They are chemical trails (aka “chemtrails“) being intentionally sprayed into the atmosphere. Heck, there are actually multiple patents on this technology.
THE GATES FAMILY LEGACYBill’s father (William H. Gates, Sr.) was a banker and attorney, who served the same “hidden agenda” as his son while promoting “racial hygiene” during the Rockefeller-financed eugenics movement of the 1930s and 1940s.
Gates Sr. has long been involved with the eugenics group Planned Parenthood, a rebranded organization birthed out of the American Eugenics Society. In a 2003 interview with PBS, Bill Gates admitted that his father used to be the head of Planned Parenthood, which was founded on the concept that most human beings are just “reckless breeders” and “human weeds” in need of culling.
During the interview, Bill Gates also admitted that his family has been extensively involved with “reproductive issues,” referencing his own prior adherence to the beliefs of eugenicist Thomas Robert Malthus, who believed that the world population needs to be controlled through reproductive restrictions.
Mary Gates, Bill’s mother, was a prominent Seattle businesswoman. Her father, Willard Maxwell, was a vice president of Pacific National Bank, which later became First Interstate. Mary helped her son Bill “get the contract that led to a lucrative relationship with I.B.M. for his fledgling Microsoft Corporation,” according to her New York Times obituary.
It turns out that the Gates family legacy has long been one of trying to dominate and control the world’s systems, including in the areas of technology, medicine, and now agriculture. Through the BMGF, Bill Gates is able to avoid taxes while maintaining control of the assets and using that control to influence private and public policy regarding pharmaceuticals, vaccines, and GMOs. Money talks.
Speaking of vaccines…
GATES & VACCINESVaccines are the “philanthropic” endeavor for which Gates and the BMGF are best known.
The “benevolent Bill Gates” was born in December of 1998 – during the Microsoft antitrust trial – when the BMGF announced a $100 million gift to establish the Bill and Melinda Gates Children’s Vaccine Program.
The next year, the BMGF pledged $750 million as the “seed money” to set up the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI). GAVI’s partners include certain countries, the Bill and Melinda Gates Children’s Vaccine Program, International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association, Rockefeller Foundation, United Nations Children’s Fund, WHO, and the World Bank. The GAVI board is comprised of representatives from “Big Pharma.”
Gates has been associated with numerous vaccine initiatives in third-world countries which are not only immoral and unethical, but have had disastrous consequences.
For instance, in a 2013 report to the India Parliament, the BMGF was accused of targeting illiterate adolescents without consent for HPV (human papilloma virus) trials in India. These alleged medical experiments provided for no investigations or reporting of known adverse drug reactions.
The next year, in August of 2014, the Economic Times India published a report which alleged that “observational studies” (i.e. vaccine “experiments”) had been carried out on 30,000 tribal school children in Andhra Pradesh and Vadodara, Gujarat, India, using the HPV vaccines (Gardasil and Cervarix) and within a month of receiving the vaccine, hundreds of the children became sick and seven children died. Shockingly, the report stated that many of the consent forms used to vaccinate the girls were signed “illegally” – either by the wardens from the hostels where many of the girls resided or using thumbprints from illiterate parents who couldn’t even write.
Indian government investigations charged that BMGF funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls.
However, after these adverse reactions became known, a report funded by the BMGF was released explaining that there was “no correlation” between the adverse events and the HPV vaccine.
Child is fine – gets vaccinated – gets sick – then dies. No correlation? Mmmm yeah…. Right!
In 2000, the oral polio vaccine (OPV) was finally dropped from US schedules after four decades when the authorities finally admitted that the vaccine was causing more cases of polio than the wild-type virus itself. However, despite this fact, the BMGF has involved itself in an aggressive campaign to promote the OPV in India.
According to a 2018 report by Prakash and Puliyel, since the beginning of the OPV push, while “polio” rates have been decreasing, there have been 491,000 new cases of NPAFP (“non-polio acute flaccid paralysis”) which is clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly.
So was polio eradicated? Or did they just create a “new” definition and call it NPAFP, which is now 12 times higher than expected?
Did Gates not know the OPV had been dropped in the US as he suggested he wanted to bring “good health” to impoverished third world countries? Has anyone from the BMGF rushed to India to suspend their polio vaccines until important questions can be answered about them causing NPAFP and deaths?
I’ll bet you can guess the answers to those 2 rhetorical questions.
In December 2012, in the small village of Gouro, Chad, Africa, 500 children were locked into their school and threatened that if they did not “agree” to be vaccinated with an unlicensed meningitis vaccine (MenAfriVac), they would receive no further education. The “humanitarian workers” proceeded to force vaccinate the children without their parent’s consent or knowledge.
Within hours, over 100 children began to suffer from headaches, vomiting, severe uncontrollable convulsions and paralysis. Dozens of children were transferred to a hospital in Faya and later taken by plane to two hospitals in N’Djamena, the capital city of Chad.
South African newspapers complained, “We are guinea pigs for drug makers.” Eventually, many of these vaccine injured children were returned to Gouro without a diagnosis and each family was given an unconfirmed sum of £1000 by the government. They were informed that their children had not suffered a vaccine injury. (Hmmmm …. if this were true, why would their government give each family “hush money”?)
What group was in charge of this vaccine disaster which could be described as a “crime against humanity” in Chad?
That’s right! The BMGF funded the distribution of the meningitis vaccine (MenAfriVac) in Chad where dozens of children suffered hallucinations, convulsions, and ultimately paralysis.
Despite the fact the BMGF call vaccines “one of the best buys in global health,” a government inquiry in Pakistan has found the complete opposite.
ISLAMABAD: A government inquiry has found that polio vaccines for infants funded by the Global Alliance for Vaccination and Immunisation are causing deaths and disabilities in regional countries including Pakistan.
The startling revelation is part of an inquiry report prepared by the Prime Minister’s Inspection Commission (PMIC) on the working of the Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI). The PMIC, headed by Malik Amjad Noon, has recommended that Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani immediately suspend the administration of all types of vaccines funded by the GAVI.”The main vaccinations in question were the polio vaccine and the 5-in-1 pentavalent vaccine, which were said to be responsible for the deaths and disability of a number of children in Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka, Bhutan and Japan.
Oh yeah, I almost forgot. The BMGF funded the distribution in Kenya of a tetanus vaccine containing human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) that renders a woman infertile and causes miscarriage. It was the Catholic Church that discovered the antigen.
Remember, this is the same Bill Gates who said: “The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps ten or fifteen percent.” (See video below.)
Bill Gates’ obsession with vaccines appears to be stoked by a megalomaniacal willingness to experiment with the lives of “lesser humans.”
MICROCHIPS & COVID-19At the mHealth Summit in Washington, D.C. in 2010, Bill Gates proposed a plan to use wireless technology to register every newborn on the planet in a vaccine database, to ensure that all children are vaccinated on time. The BMGF has funded MIT’s development of a contraceptive computer chip that can be controlled via remote control. The chip is implanted under a woman’s skin, releasing a small dose of the hormone levonorgestrel. The BMGF has also funded MIT to develop a microparticle implant that will automatically administer vaccines in babies.
Even more disturbing is the evidence that Bill Gates has been actively driving the coronavirus narrative using his influence. According to the Washington Times, “WHO didn’t announce the coronavirus as a pandemic until the very day after Gates — who had wished for some time that WHO would declare the coronavirus a pandemic — well, until the very day after Gates made a very large donation to a cause that benefits WHO.”
Not surprisingly, Gates is actively involved in driving the “solution” to the very pandemic with a consortium of corporate partnerships, investments into vaccines, and “contact-tracing” solutions driven through the technology sector.
Gates recently got busted on a “TED Talk” and they edited out a sentence, but Gary Franchi (and ZeroHedge) got the original footage. Why would they remove it, unless they wanted to hide it?
Check out what Gates really wants. (Just play the video and it will begin at the appropriate spot.)
A digital certificate or proof of vaccination – that’s the plan! Why would Gates be pushing for this? Here’s why: Microsoft and GAVI are planning on controlling the “global vaccination digital ID” program, announced in 2019 at the ID2020 Alliance annual summit in New York.
In the latest batch of insanity apparently there is a movement toward a registration system where people will be designated as “immune” or “vaccinated”; and only with appropriate and verifiable registry ID’s will citizens be permitted to engage in society.
Years ago he spoke about the need for pandemic preparedness. Last fall, he sponsored a global pandemic planning exercise in association with John Hopkins. And then in his recent writings and technology funding, we see his narrative for a “solution” using digital ID’s and microchips.
Do you remember a few years ago when President Trump was going to appoint our food friend, Robert F. Kennedy Jr, as the head of the Commission on Vaccination Safety and Scientific Integrity? Eventually, Bobby said that the Trump administration never contacted him after the initial meetings. We always wondered why President Trump seemingly dropped the ball on this issue.
Here’s one of the reasons why. (Just play the video and it will begin at the appropriate spot.)
So Gates told Trump, “No that’s a bad thing, don’t do that” – do NOT investigate vaccines!” … Because if we started to investigate vaccines, we might just uncover the TRUTH!
An outspoken eugenicist and “elite” supremacist, Gates lives to vaccinate. After conveniently ditching the board of Microsoft right as the COVID-19 “pandemic” started to come into full swing, Gates has been doing nothing other than advocating for mass vaccination and indefinite lock-downs until everyone on the planet is injected.
Although many question their integrity and ethics, Bill and Melinda Gates are not stupid people. They are smart enough to know the vaccines, drugs, and media industries they promote are generating BILLIONS of dollars while simultaneously causing BILLIONS of human casualties and tragedies.
QUESTION: Based on the FACTS presented in this article, is Gates the type of person you would trust to be the “de facto” leader in the world’s race to create a COVID-19 vaccine? Is he qualified? Does he have the moral integrity?
It is difficult to believe that, despite the mounting evidence outlining the many crimes against humanity that have been committed by the BMGF and GAVI, many still think of Bill Gates as a “hero.”
However, according to the definition of “hero” in the Oxford Dictionary, the word hero means: “A person, typically a man, who is admired or idealized for courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities.”
I checked Mirriam-Webster and other dictionaries, but I never found “hero” defined as someone who vaccinates innocent, vulnerable children with untested and unsafe vaccinations, causing them to suffer agonizing, untimely deaths.
FYI, there is a White House Petition with over 550,000 signatures to investigate the BMGF for “crimes against humanity.”
Philanthropy can be innovative | Bill Gates and Melinda Gates | Code Conference 2016
Bill and Melinda Gates talk with The Verge's Walt Mossberg about the sixth anniversary of the Gates Foundation's Giving Pledge, which commits billionaires to give most of their wealth to charitable causes. They argue that many wealthy entrepreneurs underestimate their own ability to apply business innovation to philanthropy.
Melinda Gates is currently focused on improving women's access to contraception, while Bill Gates says vaccination efforts in the Middle East will completely wipe out polio worldwide by 2017.
He also discusses how he views recent advances in artificial intelligence: "The dream is finally arriving."
TRANSCRIPT OF VIDEO ABOVE
Bill: One hundred and fifty people worldwide have committed the majority of their wealth to philanthropy. We asked people to write letters, which goes up on "The Giving Pledge" website, about why they are inspired to give, what things they're working on. A lot of people [the billionaires in the club] will come to the annual meeting, and then we'll have meetings of people working in a particular area, like charter schools or scientific research.
Walt: What have you learned, what mistakes have you made?"
Melinda: We're finding places where innovation makes an enormous difference. You take what you've learned in your business and apply it to other areas of the world, you can create amazing change.
They have billions of phones now in rural areas worldwide, like Bangladesh, now that the policies have been laid down and the technological rails have been laid down, a billion dollars are flowing a month, small payments, micro payments, that people are saving [in the financial institutions and banks]. We are part of a group that is really laying those technical rails in a host of countries and getting policy change around the world.
Bill: People probably heard about micro finance and the benefits there, but it's pretty small in the interest rates they have to charge in managing small amounts of money.
The cellphone thing that Melinda was talking about: the normal progression would have been that that happens in the rich and middle income countries, and then 15 years later that happens in the developing countries.
In fact, what's happened in the developing countries because of our foundation and others, is the inverse of that.
In Kenya today, there's more digital money used than there is cash money. So then the transaction fees, the ability to save and borrow, is actually better, more efficient in Kenya than it is in the United States.
So, for people with small amounts of money it's quite revolutionary. In India, finally the payment banks, which we worked five years to get authorized, they are now in business. So that same thing is going to happen in a big way there.
So, technology that helps the poorest, whether it's vaccines or seeds or savings or sanitation--we're running an organization that's all about innovation.
We spend--of the five billion a year that we're giving away--over two billion of that is pure R&D, building these new societies.
Walt: That's no different than people who have companies that are for-profit, and they're trying to do something, maybe not as lofty, I don't know. But some of the principles are the same.
Bill: Absolutely (laughing). Yeah, the bottom line is different, you know.
We're measuring women's access to contraception. A primary metric we look at is reducing the number of children who die before the age of five; and there's been great progress: that's down to about 12 million a year to about 6 million a year.
And over the next 15 years, with new vaccines and better delivery systems, we should be able to get that down to below 3 million a year. So that's the bottom line for a foundation.
Walt: Do each of the two of you have a particular passion, a particular thing that you personally focus on?
Melinda: Together we set and approve the strategies of the foundation. Within that we have certain areas of interest.
For me, I have really gone all-in on family planning (a women's access to contraceptives so she can space the time for the births of her children and so she's not subjected to a life of poverty).
If you don't have access to contraceptives, and she has child after child after child, she's gonna have a life of poverty; that's just the fate of the world.
The global heath community had backed away from family planning. That was us [the U.S.]. But if the U.S. doesn't set the agenda--the U.S. is making it harder for you to get contraception and that shouldn't be because what we do in our country actually effects the global world.
I spent a lot of time in the villages and slums these days; I'm out at least four times a year in the developing world, and women were asking me for contraceptives.
It was the strangest thing. The woman are saying, "I used to walk down to this clinic that was 12 kilometers away, and my husband didn't know I go, and I would get this shot in my arm, and I went and it's not available."
Two hundred and ten million women today are telling us they want access to contraceptives, and we're not delivering them. That's gotta change. So our foundation has gotten very committed to this with a global set of partners putting this back on the agenda in 2012.
What I'm trying to do is bend the curve--that what would have happened, maybe, if we were lucky, by 2035--I'm trying to bend the curve and get it to happen by 2020, which is to give 110 million women access to contraceptives.
Walt: Melinda, you talk about women--what about men?
Melinda: Men are important, very important (laughing).
Walt: Don't men have a responsibility for contraception as well?
Melinda: They do, but at the end of the day, the women has to be able to take and make that decision if her husband won't take and make that decision with her.
Walt: But you kind of not counting on the husband at all.
Melinda: I need to tell you what truly research tells us--you don't make decisions without good data and research. We as a foundation are doing our research and collecting good data--the world isn't collecting great data on women (we're starting to change that too).
What the data tells you is that in a setting like many places in Africa, a woman cannot negotiate a condom with her husband. Condoms are available because of PEPFAR, because of the Global Fund, but the women will tell you over and over again that I can't negotiate that with my husband because I'm either suggesting he has AIDS or I'm telling him I have AIDS. That's a non-starter.
So they have to be able to use contraceptives, whether their husband will allow them or not.
And they will, they will take that decision on themselves because they know it saves lives [because she won't have child after child after child, with the odds of some of her children dying before the age of five--she'll have less children die if she has less children to begin with].
Bill Gates and the Population Control Grid (May 17, 2020, corbettreport)
Bill: Well, vaccinations have been a big era for the foundation and, so, understanding the science there, who to get behind, what the new approaches are, how to make those super cheap, and then how to get them delivered.
And one of the monumental things, the thing I've spent the most time on, is polio eradication. The world eradicated one disease in all of history, which is smallpox, certified back in 1980. Polio was almost failing seven years ago--couldn't get it out of India, couldn't get it out of Africa.
“There hasn’t been a kill off in human history to match what happened in the Americas—90 to 95 percent of the indigenous population wiped out over a century,” says Thomas Mockaitis, a history professor at DePaul University. “Mexico goes from 11 million people pre-conquest to one million.”Bill: So, we've really intensified using satellite photos to find the villages and GPS to track, improving the vaccine itself.
Centuries later, smallpox became the first virus epidemic to be ended by a vaccine. In the late 18th-century, a British doctor named Edward Jenner discovered that milkmaids infected with a milder virus called cowpox seemed immune to smallpox. Jenner famously inoculated his gardener’s 9-year-old son with cowpox and then exposed him to the smallpox virus with no ill effect.
“The annihilation of the smallpox, the most dreadful scourge of the human species, must be the final result of this practice,” wrote Jenner in 1801.
And he was right. It took nearly two more centuries, but in 1980 the World Health Organization announced that smallpox had been completely eradicated from the face of the earth. [Source]
So, with any luck, we'll have the last case of polio sometime next year. We're down to two countries, just Pakistan and Afghanistan. We haven't had a case in Africa for a year and a half now and in India for over three years now.
So, polio will become the second disease ever eradicated. And based on the success there, we'll go after hazels and malaria.
Walt: I'm old enough to remember the big polio scare in the United States and in the 1950s when they lined us all up as kids and gave us shots on mass. I mean, there were a couple of years there that you were told not to go swimming. I don't know remember what it was, but it was a whole thing in summer camps and everything. So, it seemed to be conquered in the U.S.
Bill: That's right. By 1965 polio was essentially gone from the U.S. because of Jonas Salk's IPV vaccine. So, by 1988 [Walt interrupts].
Walt: I just assumed that that [polio] then spread throughout the whole world, right?
Bill: No, there's a lot of things like measles and malaria that were once huge problems in the U.S., even yellow fever--that because of our wealth and, because we're not equatorial, we're more of a temperate climate--it's been possible to get rid of these infectious diseases. Where as they're still gigantic, you know, killing over half a million children a year in the case of malaria.
That there's this huge market failure, which is that the people who have the malaria problem have no money, so there's no natural incentive to create a vaccine there. So only philanthropy and governments are coming in and taking on polio eradication.
Walt: So the market, the commercial companies won't [Bill interrupts].
Bill: Your voice in the marketplace if you're poor, if you need something like life-saving medicine, you have no volume in terms of the resources of the world. And that's a known shortcoming of capitalism, which I'm a huge fan of, but it needs to be leavened by some degree of philanthropy, where you say research and education--let's do more and understand what's really working there. Likewise, for seeds, making those more productive, so that we can feed the world even in the face of worse weather.
Melinda: I think one of the things that surprised me the most when we got into this work over 15 years ago, was, that you know, vaccines that we do, that we all take for granted--we go and get our kids these vaccinations--you've had vaccinations over your lifetime--that, when we came into this work, that there was a 25-year lag between when a vaccine came out in the United States and it got to a place like Kenya, and it got to certain places of India. And even if they got there, they didn't have the right strains.
So, we started to say, what's the role--you have to always ask yourself, as a philanthropist, what's our role, what's the role of philanthropy?
And what we saw was this market failure. And we said, Okay, there's R&D work to be done, we're going to work on that, but there's also, let's create a pull mechanism for vaccines. So we pulled money with governments--huge pool of money--this vaccine alliance that we keep raising money for.
And we can go now to the manufacturers and guarantee a market for their vaccines. So the pharmaceutical companies are then incentivized to work on it, and that pull mechanism.
So, I think that's another thing, that if you've been in business you think about data, you think about markets, you think about your unique leverage, you start to think about what tools exists and what needs to be created.
And that kind of thinking, that everybody in this room does, is hugely beneficial to society. And in philanthropy, philanthropy's role--we see it as this catalytic wedge; that is, to fill in the place between governments and private sector to sort of push, and push along the way, where markets fail, so that society works for everyone around the world, not just the select few that happened to be lucky enough to be born in the United States or the UK or Japan.
Walt: Bill, you were one of the first people in tech to become very wealthy. A huge amount of wealth has been created by the tech business. Is that wealth being spent on philanthropy to the degree you would have expected or in other areas, other kinds of wealth have been spent on philanthropy?
Bill: I would love to see a lot more done. We're no where near the potential. Compared to other industries, the successful people in technology are the most generous. Take facebook--Mark Zuckerberg, super generous. Most of the leaders in the industry, not all, have made the commitment, and are getting involved in philanthropy, even at a young age.
Walt: What should they be doing with their money? Is there some resource they should use? Does your foundation offer that to them?
Bill: In our case, we have a staff heavy approach to doing things fairly substantially. We have 1500 who work for us, so it's an institution understanding these diseases or the U.S. education system--the kind of analysis, the kind of thinking we have, is as good as Microsoft at its very best. A large number of those people are available to brainstorm with other philanthropists and facilitate their work.
We have a team that's listed on the website that's glad to brainstorm with people... some of it involves thinking about your finite life and, you know, where the resources end up going... and people pick causes, and that's what's amazing. How you end up picking what you pick, it's very individual, it's very personal--there's no one right thing to give to. But there are a lot of lessons about ways to go about it.
Walt: One of the things that you've been talking a lot about is AI. It's been around for a while, but it's kind of exploding now. What do you think about it, do you think it's the big new thing, and is there any danger to it?
Bill: Certainly, it's the most exciting thing going on, and it's the holy grail; it's the big dream that anybody who's ever been in computer science has been thinking about, and about very specific problems like speech recognition and vision.
We now have systems that are better than human-level of capability.
So the progress in the last five years has been dramatically faster than in any time in history.
Some of these techniques around deep learning really are very profound. There's a recent book by Pedro Domingo called "The Master Algorithm", which I highly recommend if somebody wants to understand the different types of learning machines that are out there and what they're good at and what their limitations are.
There's no doubt that in a 10-year time frame we will have for physical tasks--driving, warehouse work, cleaning up rooms--we'll have robots that are way less expensive than human labor for doing those things.
And for various types of expertise, we'll have better and better machines.
It's an amazing thing, it's a very positive thing--supply of goods that we can meet. It will challenge us in two ways: when you get that excess labor in certain places, how do you retrain it and apply it to other things?
It's not like there is zero demand for labor.
Until, you know, every class size is 10 and vacation policies are way more generous, every old person is taken care of.
Just go out to the developing world if you ever think there's too many people and the labor has no value.
So, if we redirect it, that's very good. Then, in the long run, there really is the question about purpose and control.
The books like "Boss from Superintelligence", another book that I highly recommend.
So, the dream is finally arriving; this is what it was all leading up to: machines that are as capable and more capable than human intelligence.
Melinda: And I want to put a cap on this, as well. One thing I will tell you about Bill is, which is when we go on vacation he always takes a huge bag of books, and I can always tell what's on his mind by his bag of books, and there have been a lot of AI books.
So, while you think he's working on philanthropy, the side of his brain is also thinking about that [AI]. He has been thinking about this for a long time.
When Bill talks about where AI is going--and I care a lot about where AI is going. I think it's gonna happen. If we don't have women involved in that--think about that in health care--artificial intelligence in health care, just as one example. You want women participating in all of these things because you want a rich set of a diverse environment creating AI and tech tools and everything we're gonna use.
Question from audience member: Everyone in the room and the vast majority benefit from vaccines, but there are a few people that suffer from vaccines and the side effects, like MMR or thimersal or mercury-related preservative issues. Are you studying like a test that can figure out if a kid's going to suffer from the vaccinations?
Bill: Yeah, unfortunately, there are rumors about vaccines doing negative things that, in fact, they don't do, like the thimersal thing. We have countries that use thimersal and did not use thimersal--literally, billions of shots given in both cases, and we're able to compare. It is fair to say that there are, fortunately, very rare cases; and the U.S. has a compensation fund.
And we always look at the net benefits--that is, does the benefit of using the vaccine fair, fair outweigh any of the fairly rare side effects.
One of the vaccines that can emanate a negative effect is one of the two polio vaccines. It's the one that's cheap and is used mostly, the so-called oral vaccine, actually, in one out of the million cases causes this disease. And that's why, right at the end of this disease, we're doing this very complicated to switch from that, the oral vaccine, to the Sabin vaccine, back to the original Salk vaccine.
So, getting that down in price--it's not as easy to administer because it's a shot.
We have to be really hyper careful about the safety of vaccines, because anything that affects their reputation causes people, vast number of people, to shy away from them. And then you get diseases that are incredibly infectious, like measles and pertussis, that negative rumors about vaccines have killed literally thousands of people in the rich world, who never should have died because their parents were afraid of things that they'd heard. So, you gotta make sure they're safe and get the word out.
Question from another audience member: All the talk yesterday about the foundation focused on the eradication of diseases and the work in places like Africa. Are you pulling back from education in the U.S or are their comments you can share about the efforts in terms education in the U.S. and the foundation?
Melinda: Education in the U.S. is the number one thing we work on in the U.S. because we feel like every kid getting a chance at a great education is really what forms a phenomenal democracy. And the truth is, today, a third of the kids are actually prepared to go to college. And we just shouldn't have a public school system that exists in that way.
So, we have billions of dollars on investments in the education system in the United States because of that belief.
And, sometimes Bill and I feel the hardest work--even though there's disease eradication that we're talking about is very hard--the U.S. education system is proving the hardest to work on.
And I think the thing we have come to learn is that the most important thing in a kid's education is the teacher at the front of the classroom. That if the child has an effective teacher, it makes all the difference in their learning gains. And so we are working very hard to have an effective teaching system and an evaluation system that's not punitive but helps teachers rise up.
And, then we're working on tools, the computer tools--and there's a lot of disruption coming there, along side the teacher for blended and, really, a personalized learning plan for kids that helps keep them on the path to college.
Bill: I think as people think about their philanthropy, they'll probably start in their community with social service needs, homelessness right in the city they work in, but then the next step, hopefully, will be the U.S. education system.
We need all of you to pick charter schools, pick public schools, get involved and see what's not happening because we have this huge problem, in that the lead are mostly sending their children to private schools, so the idea of what's going on, particularly in the inner city schools, there isn't this awareness to think about how we help those teachers be better--how do we get technology into those things...
If you ever despair, you can go to one of these great charter schools, and it's so incredible to see. And there are lots of people in the tech industry who have gotten involved in this stuff. So, I really encourage people to consider that as one of the areas that they dive into.
8 Things You May Not Know About Jonas Salk and the Polio Vaccine
By Christopher Klein
Explore eight surprising facts about the groundbreaking polio vaccine that Dr. Salk developed.
1. Although polio was the most feared disease of the 20th century, it was hardly the deadliest.
“Polio was never the raging epidemic portrayed in the media, not even at its height in the 1940s and 1950s,” writes David M. Oshinsky in his Pulitzer Prize winning book “Polio: An American Story.”
During those decades, 10 times as many children died in accidents and three times as many succumbed to cancer.
Oshinsky notes that polio inspired such fear because it struck without warning and researchers were unsure of how it spread from person to person. In the years following World War II, polls found the only thing Americans feared more than polio was nuclear war.
2. Franklin D. Roosevelt proved instrumental in the vaccine’s development.
A year after his nomination as a Democratic vice presidential candidate, rising political star Franklin D. Roosevelt contracted polio while vacationing at his summer home on Campobello Island in 1921. The disease left the legs of the 39-year-old future president permanently paralyzed.
In 1938, five years after entering the White House, Roosevelt helped to create the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis, later renamed the March of Dimes Foundation, which became the primary funding source for Salk’s vaccine trials.
Employing “poster children” and enlisting the star power of celebrities from Mickey Rooney to Mickey Mouse, the grassroots organization run by Roosevelt’s former Wall Street law partner Basil O’Connor was raising more than $20 million per year by the late 1940s.
3. Salk challenged prevailing scientific orthodoxy in his vaccine development.
While most scientists believed that effective vaccines could only be developed with live viruses, Salk developed a “killed-virus” vaccine by growing samples of the virus and then deactivating them by adding formaldehyde so that they could no longer reproduce.
By injecting the benign strains into the bloodstream, the vaccine tricked the immune system into manufacturing protective antibodies without the need to introduce a weakened form of the virus into healthy patients.
Many researchers such as Polish-born virologist Albert Sabin, who was developing an oral “live-virus” polio vaccine, called Salk’s approach dangerous. Sabin even belittled Salk as “a mere kitchen chemist.”
The hard-charging O’Connor, however, had grown impatient at the time-consuming process of developing a live-virus vaccine and put the resources of the March of Dimes behind Salk.
4. Salk tested the vaccine on himself and his family.
After successfully inoculating thousands of monkeys, Salk began the risky step of testing the vaccine on humans in 1952. In addition to administering the vaccine to children at two Pittsburgh-area institutions, Salk injected himself, his wife and his three sons in his kitchen after boiling the needles and syringes on his stovetop. Salk announced the success of the initial human tests to a national radio audience on March 26, 1953.
5. The clinical trial was the biggest public health experiment in American history.
On April 26, 1954, six-year-old Randy Kerr was injected with the Salk vaccine at the Franklin Sherman Elementary School in McLean, Virginia. By the end of June, an unprecedented 1.8 million people, including hundreds of thousands of schoolchildren, joined him in becoming “polio pioneers.”
For the first time, researchers used the double-blind method, now standard, in which neither the patient nor person administering the inoculation knew if it was a vaccine or placebo.
Although no one was certain that the vaccine was perfectly safe—in fact, Sabin argued it would cause more cases of polio than it would prevent—there was no shortage of volunteers.
6. Salk did not patent his vaccine.
On April 12, 1955, the day the Salk vaccine was declared “safe, effective and potent,” legendary CBS newsman Edward R. Morrow interviewed its creator and asked who owned the patent.
“Well, the people, I would say,” said Salk in light of the millions of charitable donations raised by the March of Dimes that funded the vaccine’s research and field testing. “There is no patent. Could you patent the sun?”
Lawyers for the foundation had investigated the possibility of patenting the vaccine but did not pursue it, in part because of Salk’s reluctance.
7. Although a tainted batch of the Salk vaccine killed 11 people, Americans continued vaccinating their children.
Just weeks after the Salk vaccine had been declared safe, more than 200 polio cases were traced to lots contaminated with virulent live polio strains manufactured by the Cutter Laboratories in Berkeley, California.
Most taken ill became severely paralyzed. Eleven died.
In the haste to rush the vaccine to the public, the federal government had not provided proper supervision of the major drug companies contracted by the March of Dimes to produce 9 million doses of vaccine for 1955.
Although the United States surgeon general ordered all inoculations temporarily halted, Americans continued to vaccinate themselves and their children.
Outside of the “Cutter Incident,” not a single case of polio attributed to the Salk vaccine was ever contracted in the United States.
8. A rival vaccine supplanted Salk’s in the 1960s.
Once Sabin’s oral vaccine finally became available in 1962, it quickly supplanted Salk’s injected vaccine because it was cheaper to produce and easier to administer. Ultimately, both vaccines produced by the bitter rivals nearly eradicated the disease from the planet.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), there were only 416 reported cases of polio worldwide in 2013, mostly confined to a handful of Asian and African countries.
Since Sabin’s live-virus vaccine, which is responsible for about a dozen cases of polio each year, is seen as the final obstacle to eliminating the disease in most of the world, the WHO has urged polio-free countries to return to Salk’s killed-virus vaccine.
Coronavirus Outbreak: ID2020, RFID, BILL GATES VACCINE, WARNING! (Mirrored) - uploaded March 25, 2020 by Scarack Truther
You might not want to scroll down! Dr. Bruce Lipton "BE AWARE OF THIS!" - uploaded March 20, 2020 by Video Advice
A video surfaces of an in-depth 60 Minutes report from 1979, where Mike Wallace details how the government "publicity machine" was used to scare tens of millions into taking a largely unnecessary vaccine (Swine Flu) that ultimately did far more damage:
Storing medical information below the skin’s surface
Anne Trafton | MIT News Office
December 18, 2019
Specialized dye, delivered along with a vaccine, could enable “on-patient” storage of vaccination history.
Every year, a lack of vaccination leads to about 1.5 million preventable deaths, primarily in developing nations. One factor that makes vaccination campaigns in those nations more difficult is that there is little infrastructure for storing medical records, so there’s often no easy way to determine who needs a particular vaccine.
MIT researchers have now developed a novel way to record a patient’s vaccination history: storing the data in a pattern of dye, invisible to the naked eye, that is delivered under the skin at the same time as the vaccine.
“In areas where paper vaccination cards are often lost or do not exist at all, and electronic databases are unheard of, this technology could enable the rapid and anonymous detection of patient vaccination history to ensure that every child is vaccinated,” says Kevin McHugh, a former MIT postdoc who is now an assistant professor of bioengineering at Rice University.
The researchers showed that their new dye, which consists of nanocrystals called quantum dots, can remain for at least five years under the skin, where it emits near-infrared light that can be detected by a specially equipped smartphone.
McHugh and former visiting scientist Lihong Jing are the lead authors of the study, which appears today in Science Translational Medicine. Ana Jaklenec, a research scientist at MIT’s Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, and Robert Langer, the David H. Koch Institute Professor at MIT, are the senior authors of the paper.
An invisible record
Several years ago, the MIT team set out to devise a method for recording vaccination information in a way that doesn’t require a centralized database or other infrastructure.
Many vaccines, such as the vaccine for measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR), require multiple doses spaced out at certain intervals; without accurate records, children may not receive all of the necessary doses.
“In order to be protected against most pathogens, one needs multiple vaccinations,” Jaklenec says. “In some areas in the developing world, it can be very challenging to do this, as there is a lack of data about who has been vaccinated and whether they need additional shots or not.”
To create an “on-patient,” decentralized medical record, the researchers developed a new type of copper-based quantum dots, which emit light in the near-infrared spectrum. The dots are only about 4 nanometers in diameter, but they are encapsulated in biocompatible microparticles that form spheres about 20 microns in diameter. This encapsulation allows the dye to remain in place, under the skin, after being injected.
The researchers designed their dye to be delivered by a microneedle patch rather than a traditional syringe and needle.
Such patches are now being developed to deliver vaccines for measles, rubella, and other diseases, and the researchers showed that their dye could be easily incorporated into these patches.
The microneedles used in this study are made from a mixture of dissolvable sugar and a polymer called PVA, as well as the quantum-dot dye and the vaccine.
When the patch is applied to the skin, the microneedles, which are 1.5 millimeters long, partially dissolve, releasing their payload within about two minutes.
By selectively loading microparticles into microneedles, the patches deliver a pattern in the skin that is invisible to the naked eye but can be scanned with a smartphone that has the infrared filter removed.
The patch can be customized to imprint different patterns that correspond to the type of vaccine delivered.
“It’s possible someday that this ‘invisible’ approach could create new possibilities for data storage, biosensing, and vaccine applications that could improve how medical care is provided, particularly in the developing world,” Langer says.
Tests using human cadaver skin showed that the quantum-dot patterns could be detected by smartphone cameras after up to five years of simulated sun exposure.
The researchers also tested this vaccination strategy in rats, using microneedle patches that delivered the quantum dots along with a polio vaccine. They found that those rats generated an immune response similar to the response of rats that received a traditional injected polio vaccine.
“This study confirmed that incorporating the vaccine with the dye in the microneedle patches did not affect the efficacy of the vaccine or our ability to detect the dye,” Jaklenec says.
The researchers now plan to survey health care workers in developing nations in Africa to get input on the best way to implement this type of vaccination record keeping.
They are also working on expanding the amount of data that can be encoded in a single pattern, allowing them to include information such as the date of vaccine administration and the lot number of the vaccine batch.
The researchers believe the quantum dots are safe to use in this way because they are encapsulated in a biocompatible polymer, but they plan to do further safety studies before testing them in patients.
“Storage, access, and control of medical records is an important topic with many possible approaches,” says Mark Prausnitz, chair of chemical and biomolecular engineering at Georgia Tech, who was not involved in the research. “This study presents a novel approach where the medical record is stored and controlled by the patient within the patient’s skin in a minimally invasive and elegant way.”
The research was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Koch Institute Support (core) Grant from the National Cancer Institute. Other authors of the paper include Sean Severt, Mache Cruz, Morteza Sarmadi, Hapuarachchige Surangi Jayawardena, Collin Perkinson, Fridrik Larusson, Sviatlana Rose, Stephanie Tomasic, Tyler Graf, Stephany Tzeng, James Sugarman, Daniel Vlasic, Matthew Peters, Nels Peterson, Lowell Wood, Wen Tang, Jihyeon Yeom, Joe Collins, Philip Welkhoff, Ari Karchin, Megan Tse, Mingyuan Gao, and Moungi Bawendi.
Bill Gates’ company Microsoft patented microchip technology for cryptocurrency. This technology uses a tattoo-like mechanism to inject invisible nano particles subcutaneously. You will not be able to cut them out or remove them.
“In the next few years, we are going to see national governments take large steps towards instituting a cashless society where people transact using centralized digital currencies. Simultaneously, the decentralized cryptocurrencies – that some even view as harder money – will see increased use from all sectors.” – Caleb Chen, London Trust Media
Understanding cryptocurrency properties
1) Irreversible: After confirmation, a transaction can‘t be reversed. By nobody. And nobody means nobody. Not you, not your bank, not the president of the United States, not Satoshi, not your miner. Nobody. If you send money, you send it. Period. No one can help you, if you sent your funds to a scammer or if a hacker stole them from your computer. There is no safety net.
2) Pseudonymous: Neither transactions nor accounts are connected to real-world identities. You receive Bitcoins on so-called addresses, which are randomly seeming chains of around 30 characters. While it is usually possible to analyze the transaction flow, it is not necessarily possible to connect the real-world identity of users with those addresses.
3) Fast and global: Transactions are propagated nearly instantly in the network and are confirmed in a couple of minutes. Since they happen in a global network of computers they are completely indifferent of your physical location. It doesn‘t matter if I send Bitcoin to my neighbor or to someone on the other side of the world.
4) Secure: Cryptocurrency funds are locked in a public key cryptography system. Only the owner of the private key can send cryptocurrency. Strong cryptography and the magic of big numbers make it impossible to break this scheme. A Bitcoin address is more secure than Fort Knox.
5) Permissionless: You don‘t have to ask anybody to use cryptocurrency. It‘s just a software that everybody can download for free. After you installed it, you can receive and send Bitcoins or other cryptocurrencies. No one can prevent you. There is no gatekeeper.
Pope Francis' proposal for 'new humanism' would 'wipe out Christianity' - uploaded September 16, 2019 by LifeSiteNews
In his address to diplomats, Pope Francis highlighted two key areas related to the Global Educational Pact: climate change and interreligious dialogue.
In May 2019, Pope Francis made a strong push for globalism, calling for a supranational, legally constituted body to enforce United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and to implement “climate change” policies.
More recently, during an in-flight press conference on his return from a seven-day apostolic visit to Africa, Francis said our “duty” is to “obey international institutions,” such as the United Nations and the European Union.
On March 13, 2013, the Catholic cardinals elected a new pope after just two days of deliberations, selecting 76-year-old Argentinian Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio on the fifth vote. He has taken the name of Francis and was not considered to be one of the front runners. He is the first Jesuit pope and the first non-European pope since the 8th century. It has been 1,272 years since a non-European pope led the Church, and is particularly appropriate today, as the number of Catholics have declined in Europe, but grown significantly throughout Latin America. It is now home to 41 percent of Catholics and is “perceived as a Catholic bedrock that needs support to counter the tremendous growth of Protestantism.” Latin America is also home to a replica of Solomon's Temple, which was inaugurated in Brazil on July 31, 2014.
In a relatively short time: "Pope Francis has earned wide-spread admiration for his modesty and concerns for the poor and oppressed as well as his liberal pronouncements on a broad range of issues, from same-sex marriage and the excesses of capitalism to the threat of climate change. However, while addressing lawmakers from both parties on super-charged issues such as climate change, the pope may have to walk a fine line between spiritual leader and public policy advocate."
Pope Francis landed on U.S. soil for the first time just before 4 p.m. ET on Tuesday, September 22, 2015, launching a six-day visit. Francis became the fourth head of the Catholic Church to visit the United States, nearly 50 years after Paul VI made the first visit by a pontiff to the country in October 1965. Thursday could be the most politically significant day of his trip, with the first-ever joint address to Congress by a pontiff. He'll then head to New York, where he will host a religious service at the ground zero site of the September 11 attacks in 2001 and address the United Nations. His trip ends Sunday in Philadelphia [which is the eve of the final blood red of the tetrad, a rare super moon]. While he is certain of a warm welcome, Francis' trip will include uncomfortable moments — as is typical of a pontiff who has disrupted the status quo and questioned the morality of modern society. He is certain to emphasize one of the central themes of his papacy — that the unfettered capitalism practiced in the United States and the West is fostering income inequality and creating an economic culture where the poor are simply discarded. In a highly symbolic moment, Francis will pass on lunch with lawmakers after addressing Congress and will dine instead with homeless people in Washington. While he is expected to praise U.S. founding ideals of democracy and freedom, Francis could also wade onto dangerous political ground. [Source]
On September 24, 2015, upon invitation by House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH), the pope delivered an "historic address" to Congress. He was welcomed enthusiastically to a House chamber packed with Supreme Court justices, Cabinet officials, and lawmakers of both parties, uniting the bickering factions as all stood to cheer his arrival. The sergeant at arms intoned "Mr. Speaker, the pope of the Holy See," and Francis made his way up the center aisle in his white robes, moving slowly as lawmakers applauded, some inclining their heads in bows. He spoke from the same dais where presidents deliver their State of the Union speeches. Behind him sat Vice President Joe Biden and House Speaker John Boehner, the first and second in line to the presidency, both Catholics. He reiterated his stance on climate change, "the environmental deterioration caused by human activity" [the day before he was cheered by jubilant crowds as he visited the White House — where he and President Barack Obama embraced each other's warnings on climate change]. According to The Associated Press, "Francis, 78, enjoys approval ratings the envy of any U.S. politician as he's remade the image of the Catholic Church toward openness and compassion, yet without changing fundamental church doctrine. Addressing a chamber full of elected officials, he may have been the most adept politician in the room."
In a leaked Vatican encyclical intended for a broad church, Pope Francis falls squarely on the side of current scientific thinking [of scientists paid by the government to support its bogus theory that man is the primary cause of changes in the climate]. As The New York Times reports, the pope doesn't have a rosy view of our environmental condition. He said: "The earth, our home, is beginning to look more and more like an immense pile of filth. In many parts of the planet, the elderly lament that once beautiful landscapes are now covered with rubbish." The pope said he supported stricter environmental laws. He insisted that "most global warming in recent decades is due to the great concentration of greenhouse gases." This he put down to the way that humans have chosen to live. Those who align their politics with the notion that climate change isn't man-made have been critical of the pope. Water vapor is the overwhelming greenhouse gas [it is 30 to 50 times more important than carbon dioxide (CO2)], and CO2 attributed to man is minuscule. Yet government-paid scientists claim HUMAN-INDUCED CO2 is the primary climate driver and must be eliminated to save the earth. Of course, man is prideful enough to think he is a major player when in actuality man is an insignificant producer of CO2.
There is always climate change, a fact that has been universally recognized from time immemorial. But the mendacious implication that a naturally variable climate is the result of the harmless and beneficial tiny trace gas CO2 has been repeatedly falsified. Carbon dioxide [which the scientifically illiterate refer to as "carbon"] is as essential to life on Earth as H2O; life could not exist without CO2. CO2 causes NO measurable rise in temperature. None. For the touchy-feely boneheads, I repeat: NONE. There is no “climate crisis,” and those promoting that canard are trying to scam the public. They are either as dishonest as any common thief, or they are ignorant. Most likely both. The current climate is entirely normal, and well within its historical parameters. In fact, the current climate is quite benign. Only the ignorant and the scam artists tell you otherwise. [CarbonOffsetDaily]
Follow the money. Somebody is looking to make a killing out of "global warning" panic. Climate change is like a new religion: to question is blasphemy and a crime against nature. There are not yet enough windmills/solar panels/electric autos, etc. to power us. Guess what, all that has to be manufactured from current energy. Shut it all down and we will be in mud huts, herding cattle and goats, polluting the air with millions of camp fires, not to mention the resulting increase in forest fires. Think you can do without computers, your smart phones, your planes, trains and automobiles? Believe me, the people living in the stratosphere of world government and its agencies, and the people that made billions, if not more, from selling us out, will not do without. I am certain that the president of at least one country understands the Marxist agenda of the One-World Spiritualists, and I am sure he understands that the "crisis" they are manufacturing to implement their worldview is radical environmentalism.
Vaclav Klaus, president of the Czech Republic, survived communism and now warns the world about these peoples' ultimate goal, the elimination of freedom. President Klaus is the author of the book, "Blue Planet in Green Shackles." Klaus argues that radical environmentalism is masking socialism, communism, and even fascism. "But while communism was an atheistic system," Klaus notes, "modern environmentalism has assumed a religious dimension and has become a 'green religion'." He adds: "The ultimate goal is "completely about power and about the hegemony of the 'chosen ones' (as they see themselves) over the rest of us, about the imposition of the only correct worldview (their own), about the remodeling of the world." Klaus explains that the goal of the radical environmentalist is to completely destroy private property rights and the free enterprise system by limiting the "carbon footprint" of individuals and companies, growing the size of government, and ushering in socialism. Klaus told the Washington Times: "I understand that global warming is a religion conceived to suppress human freedom." - Brannon Howse, Christian Worldview Network, "One World Spirituality: Three Worldviews Merge," October 28, 2008
By Jim Bianco, Bloomberg
March 27, 2020
An alphabet soup of new asset-buying programs will essentially nationalize large swaths of the financial markets, and the consequences could be profound.
The central bank announced $1 trillion a day in repurchase agreements and unlimited quantitative easing, which includes a hard-to-understand $625 billion of bond buying a week going forward.
At this rate, the Fed will own two-thirds of the Treasury market in a year.
But it’s the alphabet soup of new programs that deserve special consideration, as they could have profound long-term consequences for the functioning of the Fed and the allocation of capital in financial markets. Specifically, these are:
- CPFF (Commercial Paper Funding Facility) – buying commercial paper from the issuer.
- PMCCF (Primary Market Corporate Credit Facility) – buying corporate bonds from the issuer.
- TALF (Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility) – funding backstop for asset-backed securities.
- SMCCF (Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility) – buying corporate bonds and bond ETFs in the secondary market.
- MSBLP (Main Street Business Lending Program) – Details are to come, but it will lend to eligible small and medium-size businesses, complementing efforts by the Small Business Association.
The central bank is only allowed to purchase or lend against securities that have government guarantee. This includes Treasury securities, agency mortgage-backed securities and the debt issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. An argument can be made that can also include municipal securities, but nothing in the laundry list above.
So how can they do this? The Fed will finance a special purpose vehicle (SPV) for each acronym to conduct these operations. The Treasury, using the Exchange Stabilization Fund, will make an equity investment in each SPV and be in a “first loss” position.
What does this mean?
In essence, the Treasury, not the Fed, is buying all these securities and backstopping of loans; the Fed is acting as banker and providing financing. The Fed hired BlackRock Inc. to purchase these securities and handle the administration of the SPVs on behalf of the owner, the Treasury.
In other words, the federal government is nationalizing large swaths of the financial markets. The Fed is providing the money to do it. BlackRock will be doing the trades.
This scheme essentially merges the Fed and Treasury into one organization. So, meet your new Fed chairman, Donald J. Trump.
"The Federal Reserve is NOT part of the U.S. government. It is a private organization owned and operated by the British crown, bank of England, and the Rothschild bank cartel. Because of the Federal Reserve Act, every person in this country is collateral for debt that the de facto corporate government owes England. So our interest payments go directly to the British crown, and by extension, the queen and the Pope." [Source]
"This is a revolutionary article. Jim Bianco is a genius. QE of $625 billion a week is $30 trillion annualized!!! And, they’re using SPV’s because this is TOTALLY ILLEGAL. Powell is also a genius. Using the Fed and its member banks to buy this much Treasury Debt plus everything else, means they are creating money at virtually an infinite rate. It’s REVOLUTIONARY. Trump could do a $10 Trillion STIMULUS, Treasury bonds would be issued, and the Fed and its member banks would simply buy almost all of it. BRILLIANT!! Just by moving money and bonds from one account to another and adjusting member banks reserve requirements. Bianco is right. The Fed and Treasury Dept have merged and Trump now is the de facto new Fed Chairman." [Source]
Is 5G Causing Radiation Sickness?THE PROBLEM IS NOT JUST 5G (fifth generation wireless technology)!
ALL TYPES OF MANMADE RADIATION ARE HARMFUL, including radiowaves, microwaves, and millimeter waves.
The symptoms people are experiencing that are being attributed to the coronavirus are the exact same symptoms of radiation sickness or Electromagnetic Sensitivity.
Just look at these symptoms!
- loss of taste and smell
- stroke and seizures
- “fizzing” and an electrical feeling on the skin
- a burning feeling on the skin (which is EXACTLY what happens with 5G military weapons)
- neurological problems such as dizziness, headaches and impaired consciousness
- heart problems and heart attacks (which are CLEARLY a result of exposure to PULSED MICROWAVES that disrupt the electrical signaling of the human body)
- HEART RUPTURE (BTW, hearts do NOT rupture from a VIRUS! But they can and do rupture from exposure to PULSED acoustic and/or microwave frequencies)
- damage to men’s testicles (in case you did not know – exposure to any form of man-made radiation destroys male fertility)
- clotting of the blood that immediately makes me think of what happens to the blood when it is exposed to WIFI radiation
5G – FROM BLANKETS TO BULLETS
By Arthur Firstenberg
January 22, 2018
"A million powerful beams whizzing by us at all times."
The single most important fact about 5G that nobody is talking about is called “phased array.”
It will totally change the way cell towers and cell phones are constructed and will transform the blanket of radiation which has enveloped our world for two decades into a million powerful beams whizzing by us at all times.
Blake Levitt, author of Electromagnetic Fields: A Consumer’s Guide to the Issues and How to Protect Ourselves (Harcourt Brace, 1995), brought this to my attention. A mutual friend, with whom I was speaking during the campaign to defeat S.B. 649 in California, passed on a message from Blake:
“5G antennas will be phased arrays; Arthur will know what that means.”
And I did.
Phased arrays were one of the first things I learned about in the very beginning of my long, involuntary journey from medical student to campaigner against wireless technology.
After I was injured by X-rays in 1980, I began to read everything I could get my hands on that had to do with electromagnetic radiation and its effects on life.
And one of the first books I read was Paul Brodeur’s The Zapping of America (W.W. Norton, 1977).
Brodeur was a staff writer for the New Yorker who had purchased property on Cape Cod, Massachusetts, only to discover that 30 miles inland, across the bay from his future home, the Air Force was planning to construct the world’s most powerful radar station.
It was going to scan the Atlantic Ocean as a key early warning element protecting us against the threat of sea-launched ballistic missiles from the Soviet Union.
Although it emitted an average power of only 145,000 watts, similar to some FM radio stations, it did not broadcast that energy from only a single antenna and it did not spread that energy out uniformly in all directions.
Instead, it had 3,600 antennas arranged in two “phased arrays” of 1,800 antennas each.
The antennas in each array worked together as a unit to focus all their energy into a narrow, steerable beam.
Each beam had an effective power of four billion watts, and the peak radiation level exceeded 0.3 milliwatt per square centimeter—the FCC’s safety limit today—at a distance of ten miles in front of the radar station.
The facility was called PAVE PAWS (Precision Acquisition of Vehicle Entry Phased Array Warning System).
The Defense Department acknowledged in a 1975 report, quoted by Brodeur, that such systems “energize thousands of operational elements, are electronically steered at high search rates, and operate at a frequency range having a maximum whole body energy transfer to man and for which little bioeffects data exists.”
Shortly after I read this, I discovered firsthand what some of the bioeffects were.
Attempting to finish my M.D. almost cost me my life. I collapsed one day with all the symptoms of a heart attack, whereupon I resigned from school and moved up to Mendocino to recover. There I was in the path of the other PAVE PAWS, the one that scanned the Pacific Ocean.
This PAVE PAWS was due east of Mendocino, in California’s Central Valley at Beale Air Force Base. And for nine months, every evening at precisely 7:00 p.m., no matter where I was or what I was doing, my chest would tighten and I would be unable to catch my breath for the next two hours. At precisely 9:00 p.m., my body would relax and I could breathe.
I lived in Mendocino from 1982 through 1984, and although I eventually recovered my health, I was always aware of an uncomfortable pressure in my chest whenever I was on the coast.
I also lived in Mendocino from 1999 to 2004, and felt that same discomfort whenever I was there, and always felt it suddenly vanish when I drove out of range of PAVE PAWS, and suddenly return at the same point on my journey home.
5G is going to be at a much higher frequency range, which means the antennas are going to be much smaller—small enough to fit inside a smartphone—but, like in PAVE PAWS, they are going to work together in a phased array; and, like in PAVE PAWS, they are going to concentrate their energy in narrow, steerable high power beams.
The arrays are going to track each other, so that wherever you are, a beam from your smartphone is going to be aimed directly at the base station (cell tower), and a beam from the base station is going to be aimed directly at you.
If you walk between someone’s phone and the base station, both beams will go right through your body.
The beam from the tower will hit you even if you are standing near someone who is on a smartphone.
And if you are in a crowd, multiple beams will overlap and be unavoidable.
At present, smartphones emit a maximum of about two watts, and usually operate at a power of less than a watt.
That will still be true of 5G phones; however, inside a 5G phone there may be 8 tiny arrays of 8 tiny antennas each, all working together to track the nearest cell tower and aim a narrowly focused beam at it.
The FCC has recently adopted rules allowing the effective power of those beams to be as much as 20 watts.
Now, if a handheld smartphone sent a 20-watt beam through your body, it would far exceed the exposure limit set by the FCC.
What the FCC is counting on is that there is going to be a metal shield between the display side of a 5G phone and the side with all the circuitry and antennas.
That shield will be there to protect the circuitry from electronic interference that would otherwise be caused by the display and make the phone useless.
But it will also function to keep most of the radiation from traveling directly into your head or body and; therefore, the FCC is allowing 5G phones to come to market that will have an effective radiated power that is ten times as high as for 4G phones.
What this will do to the user’s hands, the FCC does not say.
And who is going to make sure that when you stick a phone in your pocket, the correct side is facing your body?
And who is going to protect all the bystanders from radiation that is coming in their direction that is ten times as strong as it used to be?
And what about all the other 5G equipment that is going to be installed in all your computers, appliances, and automobiles?
The FCC calls handheld phones “mobile stations.” Transmitters in cars are also “mobile stations.”
But the FCC has also issued rules for what it calls ”transportable stations,” which it defines as transmitting equipment that is used in stationary locations and not in motion, such as local hubs for wireless broadband in your home or business.
The FCC’s new rules allow an effective radiated power of 300 watts for such equipment.
The situation with cell towers is, if anything, worse.
So far the FCC has approved bands of frequencies around 24 GHz, 28 GHz, 38 GHz, 39 GHz, and 48 GHz for use in 5G stations, and is proposing to add 32 GHz, 42 GHz, 50 GHz, 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz, and above 95 GHz to the soup.
These have tiny wavelengths and require tiny antennas.
At 48 GHz, an array of 1,024 antennas will measure only 4 inches square. And the maximum radiated power from a base station will probably not be that large—tens or hundreds of watts. But, just as with PAVE PAWS, arrays containing such large numbers of antennas will be able to channel the energy into highly focused beams, and the effective radiated power will be enormous.
The rules adopted by the FCC allow a 5G base station operating in the millimeter range to emit an effective radiated power of up to 30,000 watts per 100 MHz of spectrum.
And when you consider that some of the frequency bands the FCC has made available will allow telecom companies to buy up to 3 GHz of contiguous spectrum at auction, they will legally be allowed to emit an effective radiated power of up to 900,000 watts if they own that much spectrum.
The base stations emitting power like that will be located on the sidewalk. They will be small rectangular structures mounted on top of utility poles.
The reason the companies want so much power is because millimeter waves are easily blocked by objects and walls and require tremendous power to penetrate inside buildings and communicate with all the devices that we own that are going to part of the Internet of Things.
The reason such tiny wavelengths are required is because of the need for an enormous amount of bandwidth—a hundred times as much bandwidth as we formerly used—in order to have smart homes, smart businesses, smart cars, and smart cities, i.e. in order to connect so many of our possessions, big and small, to the internet, and make them do everything we want them to do as fast as we want them to do it.
The higher the frequency, the greater the bandwidth—but the smaller the waves.
Base stations have to be very close together—100 meters apart in cities—and they have to blast out their signals in order to get them inside homes and buildings.
And the only way to do this economically is with phased arrays and focused beams that are aimed directly at their targets.
What happens to birds that fly through the beams, the FCC does not say.
And what happens to utility workers who climb utility poles and work next to these structures everyday?
A 30,000-watt beam will cook an egg, or an eye, at a distance of a few feet.
The power from a base station will be distributed among as many devices as are connected at the same time. When a lot of people are using their phones simultaneously, everyone’s phone will slow down but the amount of radiation in each beam will be less.
When you are the only person using your phone—for example, late at night—your data speed will be blisteringly fast but most of the radiation from the cell tower will be aimed at you.
Deep penetration into the body
Another important fact about radiation from phased array antennas is this: it penetrates much deeper into the human body, and the assumptions that the FCC’s exposure limits are based on do not apply.
This was brought to everyone’s attention by Dr. Richard Albanese of Brooks Air Force Base in connection with PAVE PAWS and was reported on in Microwave News in 2002.
When an ordinary electromagnetic field enters the body, it causes charges to move and currents to flow.
But when extremely short electromagnetic pulses enter the body, something else happens: the moving charges themselves become little antennas that re-radiate the electromagnetic field and send it deeper into the body.
These re-radiated waves are called Brillouin precursors. They become significant when either the power or the phase of the waves changes rapidly enough.
5G will probably satisfy both requirements.
This means that the reassurance we are being given—that these millimeter waves are too short to penetrate far into the body—is not true.
In the United States, AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, and T-Mobile are all competing to have 5G towers, phones, and other devices commercially available as early as the end of 2018.
AT&T already has experimental licenses and has been testing 5G-type base stations and user equipment at millimeter wave frequencies in Middletown, New Jersey; Waco, Austin, Dallas, Plano, and Grapevine, Texas; Kalamazoo, Michigan; and South Bend, Indiana.
Verizon has experimental licenses and has been conducting trials in Houston, Euless, and Cypress, Texas; South Plainfield and Bernardsville, New Jersey; Arlington, Chantilly, Falls Church, and Bailey’s Crossroads, Virginia; Washington, DC; Ann Arbor, Michigan; Brockton and Natick, Massachusetts; Atlanta; and Sacramento.
Sprint has experimental licenses in Bridgewater, New Brunswick, and South Plainfield, New Jersey; and San Diego. T-Mobile has experimental licenses in Bellevue and Bothell, Washington; and San Francisco.
Electromagnetic Sensitivity, also known as Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS) or electrosensitivity, is a condition in which an individual experiences symptoms like headaches, dizziness, unusual heart palpitations, or insomnia, around wireless technologies or electrical devices such as smart meters, cell towers, Wi-Fi, mobile phones, cordless phones, power line magnetic fields, intermediate frequencies, and electric fields from various electronics devices.
- Neurological: headaches, dizziness/nausea, memory and concentration difficulties, insomnia, depression/anxiety, fatigue/weakness, numbness/tingling, muscle and joint pains.
- Cardiac: heart palpitations, shortness of breath, heart arrhythmias, high blood pressure.
- Eyes: pain/discomfort, pressure in the eyes, deteriorating vision, cataracts.
- Ears: ringing in the ears, hearing loss.
- Other: skin problems, digestive problems, dehydration, nosebleeds, impaired sense of smell and light sensitivity.
According to Hecht and Balzer's analysis of 878 scientific works from Russian medical literature, the symptoms may take 3-5 years of exposure to emerge. Within the first 5 years, avoiding or reducing exposure may eliminate symptoms. However, after 10 years, severe symptoms and disease may become evident.
|Symptom||Possibly Related Objective Effects/Animal Research|
|Headache||Opening of the Blood-brain barrier, effects on the dopamine-opiate systems of the brain, and blood cell clumping. See References|
|Cardiovascular problems||Calcium efflux in animals' hearts; Arrhythmia in animals; Tachycardia in double-blind study with DECT cordless phones (See Magda Havas's video and References.) High blood pressure found in double-blind studies (see Devra Davis' book Disconnect).|
|Tinnitus||A study at the University of Vienna (Hans-Peter Hutter et al, 2010) found that risk of tinnitus increased with years of cell phone use.|
|Immune Problems||The RNCNIRP 2011 mentioned that a number of papers published in 2010 showed immune response to RF EMF and that chronic RF EMF exposure may lead to "borderline psychosomatic disorders." See also the Bioinitiative Report section on immune system effects.|
|Memory loss||Reduced synaptic activity in hippocampus neurons; Memory loss and neuronal death observed in rats; See References.|
|Sleeping Disorders like Insomnia||EMF reduces levels of melatonin; 3 hours of exposure prolongs latency to reach first cycle of deep sleep, and decreases stage 4 sleep (see reference)|
|Depression||Affects blood levels of serotonin in participants within 300m of a cell site. See References|
|EHS symptoms||Certain types of EMF have been found to damage Myelin. Myelin provides electrical insulation for the nervous system.|
What are the Differences and Similarities Between the Viral Infections of Common Cold, Flu, and COVID-19 (2019 Novel Coronavirus)?
The table below summarizes the similar and different signs and symptoms of the common cold, flu, and COVID-19 (all infections caused by viruses).
|Signs and Symptoms||Cold||Flu (Influenza)||COVID-19 (Wuhan Coronavirus)|
|Fever||Mild if present||Often||Often|
|Fatigue, Tiredness||Occasional, mild||Common||Occasional|
|Stuffy or Runny Nose||Common||Occasional||Infrequent|
|Cough||Mild||Dry cough||A dry cough, often severe|
|Shortness of Breath||No||Rare||With mild/moderate infection|
|Difficulty Breathing*||No||In severe infections*||Common in severe infections*|
|*Needs oxygen or ventilator|
By Mayo Clinic Staff
Hypoxemia is a below-normal level of oxygen in your blood, specifically in the arteries. Hypoxemia is a sign of a problem related to breathing or circulation, and may result in various symptoms, such as shortness of breath.
Hypoxemia is determined by measuring the oxygen level in a blood sample taken from an artery (arterial blood gas). It can also be estimated by measuring the oxygen saturation of your blood using a pulse oximeter — a small device that clips to your finger.
Normal arterial oxygen is approximately 75 to 100 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg). Values under 60 mm Hg usually indicate the need for supplemental oxygen. Normal pulse oximeter readings usually range from 95 to 100 percent. Values under 90 percent are considered low.
The 3 Strangest Covid-19 Symptoms Explained
By Keren Landman, MD
May 7, 2020
Anosmia, ‘happy hypoxia,’ and blood clots: What scientists know and don’t know
The Covid-19 pandemic is an unprecedented event in modern medical practice, and health care providers are seeing extraordinary numbers of severely ill people.
Many providers think the novel coronavirus is causing the human body to behave in weird ways. In some cases, they may be right — but not in all of them.
Some of the side effects associated with Covid-19 are unusual symptoms for a respiratory infection while others are simply being observed by doctors more often because of the sheer number of people infected.
As the pandemic unfolds, both physicians and the public are struggling to differentiate between the two as a way to better understand the virus.
Below are three symptoms that have received recent attention.
Easily clotting blood
One symptom that has been described as a mysterious complication of Covid-19 infection is the presence of blood clots in people with more severe forms of the disease.
In a prepublication study recounting the autopsy findings of 20 people in Louisiana who died from Covid-19, the authors described clotting in the small blood vessels of many patients’ lungs. A group of Dutch scientists also described a series of hospitalized people who had clotting complications; most of those complications were in the veins of the lungs.
The process of clot formation in human blood involves hundreds, if not thousands, of proteins and cells. Doctors who specialize in blood diseases can usually identify the cause of a clotting disorder by looking for patterns in blood tests that measure those proteins and cells’ abundance.
But the clotting that accompanies many severe Covid-19 infections evades that effort.
Blood tests in people with these infections “don’t fit into the usual patterns,” says Adrienne Phillips, MD, a specialist in hematology and oncology at Weill Cornell Medicine in New York City. This makes it hard to determine the root cause of clotting in these people, which in turn makes it difficult to make broad recommendations for preventing or treating those clots.
Another unusual feature of the clotting associated with Covid-19 is related to the size of the blood vessels where the clots are found.
Critically ill people who do not have Covid-19 often develop clots in large blood vessels as a side effect of not moving much and having disease-related inflammation in their bodies. These factors make clotting so likely that for years, most critically ill people have received clot-preventing medication as a matter of course while they’re in the hospital.
But many people with Covid-19 who are on clot-preventing medications are nevertheless developing clots in their lungs — and not just in the large blood vessels but in very small ones, too. “That’s what makes this clotting unique,” says Phillips. The unusual locations of these clots raise the concern that clotting is not just a side effect of a Covid-19 infection but is actually a feature of it.
Because these clots’ characteristics are so unusual, and because of the growing concern that clotting is responsible for much of the havoc the infection wreaks, several studies are underway to investigate whether drugs that prevent or bust clots can help people infected with the novel coronavirus.
While this set of symptoms might feel unusual, it’s really the number of people experiencing it that’s unusual rather than the symptom itself.
The presence of “happy hypoxia,” a phenomenon in which people with low blood oxygen levels do not actually feel short of breath, has also been treated in news reports as a clinical conundrum.
Although the spectrum of lung disease that Covid-19 causes is still not completely understood, this particular symptom is nothing new, says Martin Tobin, a professor of pulmonary and critical care medicine at Loyola University.
When it comes to the ways lungs work in the setting of Covid-19 infection, “our understanding of how the body reacts to major challenges remains the same,” he says.
At baseline, human bodies need a steady supply of fresh oxygen to live, and so people constantly produce carbon dioxide waste as a side effect of normal metabolism. Healthy lungs exchange oxygen for carbon dioxide in the lungs’ many tiny air sacs.
When a portion of the lungs has a complete blockage of air or blood flow, that exchange doesn’t happen and oxygen levels drop. But carbon dioxide, which exchanges more readily than oxygen, can still escape the lungs as long as the rest of the lung tissue is relatively healthy and not stiffened by age or disease, like uncontrolled asthma or severe pneumonia.
That results in low oxygen levels and low carbon dioxide levels — and people can actually feel pretty comfortable with low oxygen levels if they are not exerting themselves, says Tobin. Before this pandemic, doctors occasionally saw this same pattern in people with healthy lungs who had developed a bacterial pneumonia called “lobar” pneumonia.
“This is an extraordinarily contagious virus that is affecting people in the thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands,” says Tobin. Doctors aren’t used to evaluating people with respiratory problems in these numbers nor “having to make decisions about large numbers in a very short period of time.” So while this set of symptoms might feel unusual, it’s really the number of people experiencing it that’s unusual rather than the symptom itself.
Covid-19-associated smell loss may be unusual in that it is reported by so many people relatively early in the course of their infection, often without nasal passage inflammation.
Loss of smell and taste
There are some relatively common Covid-19 complications that are less common in other infections. The loss of smell and taste are among them.
A prepublication study from a group of German authors compared smell in 45 people diagnosed with Covid-19 with 45 uninfected people and found that 40% of infected people and none of the uninfected people had lost their sense of smell.
Another peer-reviewed French study found a loss of smell lasting an average of nine days in nearly half of all people infected with Covid-19; 85% of those people who lost smell also lost their sense of taste. Although anecdotal reports often highlight the absence of other symptoms accompanying loss of smell, the French investigators noted 60% of people who lost their sense of smell had a runny nose.
Well before Covid-19 was on the scene, doctors understood smell could be impaired by a variety of conditions, infections among them. A Japanese study of people who reported problems smelling after head colds identified a virus in 15 of 24 participants’ nasal discharge: Most were rhinoviruses — among the most common causes of runny noses — and one was a coronavirus.
When head colds cause loss of smell, it is often thought to be a result of swelling and mucus in the nasal passages that block smell receptors. However, it is also thought that persistent swelling of these passages can kill the nerve cells that conduct smell sensation to the brain, resulting in the inability to smell even well after the swelling is gone (they usually grow back, though).
Covid-19-associated smell loss may be unusual in that it is reported by so many people relatively early in the course of their infection, often without nasal passage inflammation or discharge.
Those features make some scientists wonder if Covid-19 is directly affecting the nerves involved in sensing smell or other cells in the lining of the nasal passages.
But as with all weird symptoms associated with the infection, further research is needed before we really understand what’s going on.
Why don’t some coronavirus patients sense their alarmingly low oxygen levels?
By Jennifer Couzin-Frankel
April 28, 2020
Among the many surprises of the new coronavirus is one that seems to defy basic biology: infected patients with extraordinarily low blood-oxygen levels, or hypoxia, scrolling on their phones, chatting with doctors, and generally describing themselves as comfortable.
Clinicians call them happy hypoxics.
“There is a mismatch [between] what we see on the monitor and what the patient looks like in front of us,” says Reuben Strayer, an emergency physician at Maimonides Medical Center in New York City.
Speaking from home while recovering from COVID-19 himself, Strayer says he was first struck by the phenomenon in March as patients streamed into his emergency room. He and other doctors are keen to understand this hypoxia, and when and how to treat it.
A normal blood-oxygen saturation is at least 95%. In most lung diseases, such as pneumonia, falling saturations accompany other changes, including stiff or fluid-filled lungs, or rising levels of carbon dioxide because the lungs can’t expel it efficiently.
It’s these features that leave us feeling short of breath—not, counterintuitively, low oxygen saturation itself, says Paul Davenport, a respiratory physiologist at the University of Florida. “The brain is tuned to monitoring the carbon dioxide with various sensors,” Davenport explains. “We don’t sense our oxygen levels.”
In serious cases of COVID-19, patients struggle to breathe with damaged lungs, but early in the disease, low saturation isn’t always coupled with obvious respiratory difficulties. Carbon dioxide levels can be normal and breathing deeply is comfortable—“the lung is inflating so they feel OK,” says Elnara Marcia Negri, a pulmonologist at Hospital Sírio-Libanês in São Paulo.
But oxygen saturation, measured by a device clipped to a finger and in many cases confirmed with blood tests, can be in the 70s, 60s, or 50s. Or even lower. Although mountain climbers can have similar readings, here the slide downward, some doctors believe, is potentially “ominous,” says Nicholas Caputo, an emergency physician at New York City Health + Hospitals/Lincoln.
Hypotheses about what causes it are emerging.
Many doctors now recognize clotting as a major feature of severe COVID-19. Negri thinks subtle clotting might begin early in the lungs, perhaps thanks to an inflammatory reaction in their fine web of blood vessels, which could set off a cascade of proteins that prompts blood to clot and prevents it from getting properly oxygenated.
Negri developed this idea after treating a woman whose breathing troubles coincided with circulatory problems in her toes. Negri’s team gave the woman heparin, a common blood thinner, and not only her toes but her breathing recovered.
Negri wondered whether heparin could boost patients’ low oxygen levels regardless of whether they were struggling to breathe. On 20 April, she posted a preprint detailing her hospital’s experience with 27 COVID-19 patients. Patients with hypoxia received heparin, and the dose was increased if they had elevated levels of D-dimer, a blood marker of excess clotting.
One of the 27 was lost to follow-up after transferring to another hospital. But 24 others are recovering—including six of eight who needed mechanical ventilation, a better rate of positive outcomes than has been reported elsewhere. Two remain critically ill. Negri is now planning to follow more patients. And several clinical trials elsewhere will test whether blood thinners can prevent or treat complications of severe COVID-19, including respiratory problems.
Strayer finds it reasonable to imagine that hypoxia emerges because “small blood vessels of the lung are being showered with clots.” His own hospital and others are beginning to test many admitted COVID-19 patients for markers of excess clotting and treat those who show it with blood thinners.
But, “It is simply not known” whether clotting causes happy hypoxia, Strayer says. There are other possibilities. Recent imaging of a hypoxic patient showed “almost waxy-looking film all around the lungs,” Caputo says. “I don’t know what is actually going on pathophysiologically down there.”
Caputo says this hypoxia is likely stressing a body already straining to battle the virus. What to do about it is prompting debate. An emerging view is that doctors should avoid aggressive treatment they’ve been trained to offer in other settings.
Luciano Gattinoni, a guest professor in intensive care at the University of Göttingen Medical Center, is wary of what he calls a “Pavlovian response” to COVID-19 hypoxia, in which doctors may swoop in to inflate lungs with ventilators or high-pressure oxygen even when patients seem comfortable. Those measures, Gattinoni wrote 24 April online in JAMA, could harm lungs that are inflating on their own but may be needed if patients aren’t helped by noninvasive treatment.
Simpler interventions, he and others say, are important. Strayer, Caputo, and their collaborator Richard Levitan, a physician at Littleton Regional Healthcare in New Hampshire, who spent time treating COVID-19 patients in a New York City emergency room, offered patients supplemental oxygen and also flipped them on their belly, an approach traditionally used for people on ventilators, which can open the lower lungs.
This month in Academic Emergency Medicine, they reported that among 50 patients with low oxygen saturation, switching to a prone position raised average saturation significantly. However, 13 of the patients weren’t helped for long and needed intubation within 24 hours.
Doctors are uncertain about the value of detecting low oxygen saturation early using inexpensive devices called pulse oximeters at home. Is home monitoring “going to prevent all bad outcomes in COVID? Absolutely not,” says Levitan, who wrote a 20 April op-ed in The New York Times arguing that early hypoxia can rapidly progress to pneumonia and death. “If we were able to detect them when they were less sick, they’d do better.”
Negri tells her patients to monitor their oxygen saturation and visit the hospital if it drops to 93% or below. At that point, she considers blood thinners and other therapy.
No one, however, has studied whether early detection of hypoxia might head off bad outcomes. Some physicians, including Gattinoni, believe pulse oximeters are best used with a doctor’s guidance, perhaps through telemedicine.
With many COVID-19 patients frightened to visit a hospital and arriving only when their symptoms have dangerously advanced, doctors also wonder whether home monitoring could hasten treatment—and whether, for some, that could make all the difference.
To Link COVID-19 to 5G is Not ‘Complete Rubbish’
By John O'Sullivan
April 18, 2020
But is it rubbish?
Not according to a de-classified former Soviet scientific study it isn’t (screenshot below).
Let’s take a look at this research from the dark days of the Cold War when interest in novel weapons of mass destruction were all the rage. It comes via the Kharkov Scientific Research Institute of Microbiology & Vaccines.
The declassified Russian document
The Russians declassified and approved for release this eye-opening study ‘‘Biological Effect of Millimeter Radiowaves’ as a PDF on May 10, 2012. It has only recently become of great interest, all due to COVID-19.
Soviet scientists from the 1970’s were telling each other to watch out for those deadly millimeter radiowaves. In case you aren’t familiar with the term millimeter radiowaves is also referred to as MmWave and 5G. The terms are used almost synonymously but there are key differences between the two.
The term mmWave refers to a specific part of the radio frequency spectrum between 24GHz and 100GHz, which have a very short wavelength.
It is important to take note that the Soviet study refers to all such waves between 24GHz and 100GHz and that current 5G levels are typically at around 50GHz to 60GHz.
This part of the electromagnetic spectrum was mostly unused, so mmWave technology aims to greatly increase the amount of bandwidth available.
But medical studies are telling us that we are at most danger when exposing ourselves to frequencies between 24GHz and 100GHz, which is where commercial 5G arrays will operate.
But our Soviet friends discovered that in their lab tests irradiating animals by millimeter waves caused changes of the processes of oxidative phosphorylation in the liver, kidneys, heart and brain of the animals.
The declassified study found that:
“Morphological, function and biochemical studies conducted in humans and animals revealed that millimeter waves caused changes in the body manifested in structural alterations in the skin and internal organs, qualitative and quantitative changes of the blood and bone marrow composition and changes of the conditioned reflex activity, tissue respiration, activity of enzymes participating in the process of tissue respiration and nucleic metabolism. The degree of unfavorable effect of millimeter waves depended on the duration of the radiation and individual characteristics of the organism.”
In the graph below we see that at the frequency of 5G transmission – at around 60GHz – there exists unique oxygen absorption properties, which may explain the hypoxia in patients located near 5G masts.
At the millimeter wave frequency of 60GHz, the absorption is very high, with 98 percent of the transmitted energy absorbed by atmospheric oxygen.
Exposure to this radio frequency could literally be starving our bodies of oxygen.
Medical doctors treating COVID-19 patients are increasingly reporting patients are experiencing symptoms of hypoxia (oxygen starvation), and it is hypoxia that is likely the cause of death, not the associated supposed flu-like symptoms.
Doctors Say COVID-19 Patients Show Symptoms of Hypoxia
“We are treating the wrong disease,” says Dr Cameron Kyle-Siddell, a New York doctor treating Coronavirus patients. He has come out with a startling disclosure saying COVID-19 patients need Oxygen therapy not Ventilator. He says the patients symptoms resemble high altitude sickness:
“I am a physician who has been working at the bedside of COVID+ patients in NYC. I believe we are treating the wrong disease and that we must change what we are doing if we want to save as many lives as possible.”
“In February, South Korean physicians reported that critical Covid-19 patients responded well to oxygen therapy without a ventilator. Patients are getting multiple organ damage from hypoxia. It’s not the pneumonia that’s the killer, it’s the cellular oxygen deprivation. And we are hurting these patients with ventilators.”
Backing this is evidence from a study among 138 patients from another hospital in Wuhan, where Yundai Chen, MD, of the Chinese PLA General Hospital in Beijing, reported during a webinar that:
“potential mechanisms for the cardiac damage are hypoxia-induced myocardial injury, cardiac microvascular damage, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome.”
Many cancer patients who receive radiotherapy often get sick afterwards with pneumonia.
Another astonishing fact is that the impact of such radiowaves on human organs is well known. The medical establishment has known for decades that exposure to all such treatments involving radiation can lead to pneumonia.
“Radiation pneumonitis is the acute manifestation of radiation-induced lung disease… Symptoms typically includes coughing, dyspnea (exertional or at rest), low-grade fever, chest and pleuritic pain”.
You can be sure that pompous media know-it-alls like the BBC’s Ian Hislop haven’t ‘fact checked’ any of that.
And where are we seeing high incidences of the symptoms of hypoxia?
Online speculation has grown precipitously around the hypothesis of a connection between the COVID-19 pandemic and 5G as revealed by the staggering rise in search engine results. People are naturally becoming concerned.
And they should be when a globally respected professional body of experts such as the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) gets involved.
The IEEE, based in New York, issued a stark public warning of grave health risks from any mass roll out of 5G telecoms technology.
Typifying concerned blog posts include: ‘Is The “Coronavirus” Actually Radiation Sickness?’
By Jeanice Barcelo
January 31, 2020
“I surmise that what might actually be occurring in China has nothing to do with any virus at all (especially since the coronavirus has been around for decades and is listed in medical literature as nothing more than the common cold), but rather is a function of radiation-induced illness brought on by the increasing density of microwave cell towers combined with the roll-out of 5G.”
Yes, Bercelo, surmises (guesses) with good reason because there are ZERO scientific studies that test the long term health effects of 5G exposure on humans. But bloggers should dig deeper, join up a few more dots…..
We know that the ‘Wireless Industry Confesses: ‘No Studies Show 5G Is Safe’’
April 07, 2020: U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal grilled wireless industry representatives, who admitted the industry has done ZERO health & safety studies on 5G technology.
Meanwhile, dozens of independent studies indicates that 5G is a risk to all biological life.
While more than 240 scientists published an appeal to the United Nations to reduce public exposure and called for a moratorium on 5G, citing “established” adverse biological effects of RF radiation.
Urgent research is needed to acquire more information on the above. The scientific evidence shows that all millimeter radiowaves between 24GHz and 100GHz are proven dangerous to health (not just current 5G commercial levels that are typically at around 50GHZ to 60GHZ).
5G levels of irradiation are proven to have inhibited the oxygen consumption rate by the mitochondria of those organs in the active phosphorylating state and slowed down the rate of respiration.
These levels or radiation are inhibiting the oxygen (O2) consumption rate by mitochondria in living cells which would likely equate to hypoxia, which is commonly seen in COVID-19 cases.
It is thus a reasonable hypothesis to suggest that 5G exposure may be having an adverse impact on COVID-19 patients.
June 8, 2018
5G technology that utilizes electromagnetic waves that are smaller than 4G technology is being built and installed despite not having been tested by the government or the industry for negative health effects.
Joe Imbriano warns that 5G technology will broadcast at 60 GHz, which is the absorption spectrum of oxygen molecules, which means it can kill at a distance.
At the molecular level, these frequencies affect the orbit of electrons, and that affects the ability of blood hemoglobin to bind with oxygen. If blood cannot hold oxygen, the result is death by suffocation.
In short, 5G technology has the potential of being used as a weapon to quickly weaken, disable, or destroy individuals or populations.
In addition to the suffocation effect, extermination of the entire human race is theoretically possible because of the effect of electromagnetic radiation on fertility. Since 1970, the sperm count in US males has dropped by 60%, which is approaching the point where men can no longer reproduce. Paul Romano says that a major contributor to the drop in fertility is the fact that men carry radiation-producing cell phones in pants pockets close to the reproductive organs.
A study funded by the Gates Foundation and published in December 2019 by researchers from MIT, the Institute of Chemistry of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the Gates-funded Intellectual Ventures Laboratory in Bellevue, WA, describes how “near-infrared quantum dots” will be implanted under the skin along with a vaccine to encode information for “decentralized data storage and bio-sensing.”
Gates’ technology uses a tattoo-like mechanism to inject invisible nano particles subcutaneously. Gates’ researchers are now testing the implant with a vaccine against the COVID-19 virus.
The Gates-funded report boasts that the chip system will allow “house-to-house” compliance searches to be conducted by government enforcement teams with “minimal training,” and will “open up new avenues for decentralized data storage and biosensing.”
The MIT paper is titled “Biocompatible near-infrared quantum dots delivered to the skin by microneedle patches to record vaccination.”
Gates began funding implantable tracking chips and ratio biotechnology in 2011 with a grant to TransDerm Inc. Gates is currently making multiple investments to develop different versions, including grants to Vaxxas Pty Ltd, Micron Biomedical Inc, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Vaxess Technologies Inc.
A pattern of 1.5-millimeter microneedles that contain vaccine and fluorescent quantum dots are applied as a patch. The needles dissolve under the skin, leaving the encapsulated quantum dots. Their pattern can be read to identify the vaccine that was administered. The project was co-led by Rice University bioengineer Kevin McHugh during his time at MIT.
Fifth generation WIFI technology has been installed in hospitals worldwide. Is radiation from 5G contributing to the deaths of hospital patients, both those with and without COVID-19?
Loner Lovebytes wrote on youtube:
These folks are being deoxygenated by the increasing 5G satellites that have been put into space every two weeks over the past SIX months. SpaceX, Northrop, and several others are launching 20,000 satellites into orbit that are now beaming high frequency microwaves down to the planet.
What are symptoms of radiation sickness?
Without writing it all out, the symptoms that average healthy people are experiencing are NOT due to this “virus”.
The virus is being used as coverup for the increasing radiation symptoms that everyone in the world is now exposed to.
So how do the “elites” avoid the same symptoms?
The magical Bill Gates vaccine will magically make the symptoms go away.
Because in the vaccine are self-assembling nano particles that allow us to interface with frequencies, which is called The Internet of Things.
The ultimate endgame for Gates, Fauci, the Deep State is to put us on house arrest (which they’ve already done) and have us take this vaccine.
This vaccine and the liquid nano-chips are the endgame to force us to give up our sovereignty, our privacy, and be part of a global cryptocurrency mining system that is tied into our DNA.
Don’t believe me? Here is the patent filed from the Gates foundation on March 23, 2020:
It is titled “cryptocurrency system using body activity data”.
So, if you are a good little boy or girl, and you drive to work, and do their bidding, then you will mine your cryptocurrency in the permanent system you have accepted.
I say permanent because these liquid nano-chips will settle into various areas of your body and you will not be able to cut them out or remove them.
So, if you take this mark into your body, say goodbye to your life.
I hope this finds people at the right time right now — to say NO to all vaccines as they have nothing but a history of causing harm.
Don’t believe me again? Last article,\. Bill Gates getting sued over killing 30,000 babies in India with his vaccines:
There is so much more to say but I leave you with this — say NO to vaccines, say NO to lockdowns — go outside and start normalizing your lives. Say NO to no further restrictions on your rights, teach your children about what is going on right now — give them this message and tell them they will need to carry it and teach THEIR children someday. We cannot forget the year of 2020 when the global fascists tried to take our rights away, and the people stood up and said NO.
This is the time we stop the evil that has been running our societies for centuries.
I wish people would have the capacity to understand what is going on. It is my honor to help my fellow brothers and sisters who are 30-50 years behind, for it is not their fault: it is the fault of the media, our schooling systems, the financial world and other citizens who purported lies instead of truth along the way. Critical thinking is not taught for a malevolent reason: to keep people uninformed and away from the truth.
Microsoft Files Patent For New Cryptocurrency and Mining System
By Christina Comben
March 27, 2020
Microsoft wants to create a new cryptocurrency that’s still mined using PoW–except replacing expensive power-intense mining rigs with basic human energy.
If that sounds a little strange, you should take a dive deep into the details of the patent published yesterday filed by Microsoft. It’s called: “Cryptocurrency system using body activity data.”
Microsoft’s Human-Mined Cryptocurrency – Creepy or Cool?
According to the patent, Microsoft’s cryptocurrency would make use of body activity data. This would allow individuals to mine crypto and replace the need for ASICs.
It sounds a little other-worldly and, honestly, borderline creepy. But if you can get past the idea of wiring humans up to some kind of server tracking their energy output, it could be a sustainable way of mining crypto without damaging the environment.
So, how does it work?
As per the patent, Microsoft states that ‘human body activity’ needed to mine cryptocurrency could be very simple. We’re not talking about forcing tribes of gym-goers to run 20k here. In fact, it could be as little as:
a brain wave or body heat emitted from the user when the user performs the task provided by an information or service provider, such as viewing an advertisement or using certain internet services, can be used in the mining process.Mining Crypto While Watching Ads
The document goes on to say that this type of activity would replace the “massive computation work” currently required by some conventional cryptocurrency systems. This is because the data that is gathered from the body activity could be regarded as Proof of Work:
therefore, a user can solve the computationally difficult problem unconsciously.The patent states that certain tasks would reduce or increase computational energy accordingly, depending on how much activity they generate. The cryptocurrency system using human body activity data would most likely work through a server giving a command to a wearable device.
Body activity data may be generated based on the sensed body activity of the user. A cryptocurrency system communicatively coupled to the device of the user may verify whether or not the body activity data satisfies one or more conditions set by the cryptocurrency system, and award cryptocurrency to the user whose body activity data is verified.At this stage, Microsoft hasn’t yet stated whether this new cryptocurrency will be based on any blockchain in particular or whether the software giant will create its own framework. It’s also not certain whether this new cryptocurrency will actually go ahead. But, in case you were thinking about using human brain waves to replace hash power, sorry, Microsoft patented it first.
How Cryptocurrency Favors Internet Of Things (IoT)
By Appzoro Technologies Inc
February 21, 2020
Internet Of Things (IoT) is 25-year-old technology but is gaining traction now due to portable devices and seamless connectivity.
Before we dig deeper into how cryptocurrency favors IoT, let's understand the fundamentals of both technologies.
Fundamentally, cryptocurrency is an encrypted decentralized currency that works on a peer-to-peer architecture digitally. The exchange of cryptocurrency happens through a blockchain, which includes the whole process of digitally mining currency and exchanging it to peers, which is recorded in a hyperledger.
Undoubtedly, the world now knows Bitcoin, which is a leading cryptocurrency known for its immense volatility. Bitcoin is also one of the most successful cryptocurrencies which has gained worldwide recognition and was adopted by various businesses like NameCheap, Subway, Twitch, Expedia, and Wikipedia.
All cryptocurrencies are capped, and the limit determines the price according to demand and supply.
The best part of cryptocurrency is that it bypasses all conventional regulations, bureaucracy, and central authority, making it easy to use and highly convenient for all its uses. The scope of fraud and error is next to zero as there is no manual intervention, calculation, or reconciliation in the whole process. All exchanges and maintained in a ledger that can be accessed by anyone; however, the transactions are encrypted in hash format.
101 of Cryptocurrency
Cryptocurrency coin is the currency unit of a particular technology-based cryptocurrency. For example, Ethereum has an Ether coin, XRP has Ripple coin, and so forth.
A unit of cryptocurrency can be called as a coin. The trading of cryptocurrency is performed on a coin basis only.
A digital wallet is mandatory for any currency exchange, and in the case of cryptocurrency, it is recommended to save your cryptocurrency in a safe and secure wallet. Most of these wallets have a private key, are secured by Two Factor Authorization (2FA), and has a public address so that anyone can deposit. Many companies also have a combination of QR codes and private keys for enhanced security.
A wallet provides a mini statement of user's transactions and also stores cryptocurrency in the most secure manner.
Blockchain is the underlying technology behind cryptocurrency, which is based on a public ledger that records all transaction data throughout the world. No manual manipulation is possible on the hyper ledger, which makes it the ultimate safest route of money transfer.
Impact of IoT and Cryptocurrency
Cryptocurrency and IoT is a perfect blend for automation in industries like Manufacturing, RPA, Financial Services, and more.
The internet of things (IoT) is all about smart automation, which includes devices communicating with each other for a seamless factory unit.
With the blend of cryptocurrency, your car can refill and pay through crypto, your fridge can remind that the milk is over, and at the same time, order milk from the nearest store and pay through cryptocurrency.
While all this happens, the consumer will only require to input fingerprint for payment authentication.
IoT in cryptocurrency is not only limited to consumer applications but is also associated mainly to enterprises and large scale industries, where centralized authority is a priority for a secure infrastructure.
In 2017-18, the world saw a cryptocurrency boom with various people making fortunes and also some of them going bankrupt. However, Facebook and Google banned cryptocurrency ads on their platforms soon, and since then, there has been no volatility in the currencies at all.
Below we have mentioned some reasons why Cryptocurrency favors the Internet of Things (IoT) and how it will enhance the overall productivity of various industries.
For any currency to go mainstream, it requires adoption from both the seller and buyer side. This involves the integration of cryptocurrency in the current payment gateways so that the point of sale (POS) systems can handle these currencies.
Enterprises should start using cryptocurrencies in their existing IoT devices for internal payments, pilot this project, and open it for the public domain.
Beneficial for Consumers and Enterprises
Cryptocurrency also makes a lot of sense for the consumer IoT. Devices like Amazon Alexa and Google Home are already ready IoT devices ready for consumer adoption.
When these devices are integrated with cryptocurrency, it has the potential to automate online shopping just through voice or whenever the stock gets over. This can also occur for large-scale purchasing within the organization from a centralized zone.
The power of digital ledger has various scope in non financial transactions also and which directly impact the IoT atmosphere. Manufacturing and factory setups can benefit a lot, as there are multiple interactions between multiple devices on the premises. The blockchain ledger is distributed, secured, encrypted, and safeguard against any kind of fraudulent. Various hackers currently attack the IoT infrastructure around the world due to unsafe private infrastructures within the company.
With the blend of IoT and cryptocurrency, shortly, we will see multiple hardwares with a decentralized network of software. These IoT devices will act as a host to run the software, which is currently controlled by a centralized cloud network.
With crypto, IoT devices will be self-reliant and will host themselves on a decentralized network.
The systems can also mine to pay the hefty infrastructure costs.
All enterprise stakeholders and CIOs should carefully analyze the benefits of applying blockchain and cryptocurrency in IoT. The nature of no regulations can be a bane and a boon for the company. The adoption rate of the above technologies is gradually increasing, and there is also less volatility in the cryptocurrency arena.
The world in the coming times is going to see various new technologies which are equipped with cryptocurrencies and IoT, making the automated smart living experience possible.
What is radiofrequency (RF) radiation?
Radiation is the emission (sending out) of energy from any source. X-rays are an example of radiation, but so is the light that comes from the sun and the heat that is constantly coming off our bodies.
When talking about radiation and cancer, many people think of specific kinds of radiation such as x-rays or the radiation made by nuclear reactors. But there are other types of radiation that act differently.
Radiation exists across a spectrum from very high-energy (high-frequency) radiation to very low-energy (low-frequency) radiation. This is sometimes referred to as the electromagnetic spectrum.
Examples of high-energy radiation include x-rays and gamma rays. They, as well as some higher energy UV radiation, are called ionizing radiation, which means they have enough energy to remove an electron from (ionize) an atom or molecule. This can damage the DNA inside of cells, which can result in cancer.
Radiofrequency (RF) radiation, which includes radio waves and microwaves, is at the low-energy end of the electromagnetic spectrum. It is a type of non-ionizing radiation. Non-ionizing radiation has enough energy to move atoms in a molecule around or cause them to vibrate, but not enough to ionize (remove charged particles such as electrons). RF radiation has lower energy than some other types of non-ionizing radiation, like visible light and infrared, but it has higher energy than extremely low-frequency (ELF) radiation.
If RF radiation is absorbed in large enough amounts by materials containing water, such as food, fluids, and body tissues, it can produce heat. This can lead to burns and tissue damage. Although RF radiation does not cause cancer by damaging DNA in cells the way ionizing radiation does, there has been concern that some forms of non-ionizing radiation might have biological effects that could result in cancer in some circumstances.
How are people exposed to RF radiation?
People can be exposed to RF radiation from both natural and man-made sources.
Natural sources include:
- Outer space and the sun
- The sky – including lightning strikes
- The earth itself – most radiation from the earth is infrared, but a tiny fraction is RF
- Broadcasting radio and television signals
- Transmitting signals from cordless telephones, cell phones and cell phone towers, satellite phones, and 2-way radios
- WiFi and Bluetooth
- Cooking food (in a microwave oven)
- Heating body tissues to destroy them in medical procedures
- “Welding” pieces of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) using certain machines
- Millimeter wave scanners (a type of full body scanner used for security screening)
Most people are exposed to much lower levels of man-made RF radiation every day due to the presence of RF signals all around us. They come from radio and television broadcasts, WiFi and Bluetooth, cell phones (and cell phone towers), and other sources.
Microwave ovens work by using very high levels of a certain frequency of RF radiation (in the microwave spectrum) to heat foods. When microwaves are absorbed by food containing water, it causes the water molecules to vibrate, which produces heat. Microwaves do not use x-rays or gamma rays, and they do not make food radioactive. Microwave ovens can cook food, but they do not otherwise change the chemical or molecular structure of it.
Microwave ovens are designed so that the microwaves are contained within the oven itself. The oven only makes microwaves when the door is shut and the oven is turned on. When microwave ovens are used according to instructions, there is no evidence that they pose a health risk to people. In the US, federal standards limit the amount of radiation that can leak from a microwave oven to a level far below what would harm people. Ovens that are damaged or modified, however, could allow microwaves to leak out, and so could pose a hazard to people nearby by potentially causing burns.
Although some people have been injured from microwave ovens, most often they have been burns from contact with steam or hot food.
Full-body security scanners
In many airports in the United States, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) uses full body scanners to screen passengers. The scanners currently used by the TSA use millimeter wave imaging. These scanners send out a small amount of millimeter wave radiation (a type of RF radiation) toward the person in the scanner. The RF radiation passes through clothing and bounces off the person’s skin as well as any objects under the clothes. The radiation is sensed by receivers that create images of the person.
Millimeter wave scanners do not use x-rays (or any other kind of high-energy radiation) and the amount of RF radiation used is very low. According to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), these scanners have no known health effects. However, TSA often allows people to be screened in a different way if they object to screening with these scanners.
Cell phones and cell phone towers
Cell phones and cell phone towers use RF radiation to transmit and receive signals. Some concerns have been raised that these signals might increase the risk of cancer, and research in this area continues. For more detailed information, see Cellular Phones and Cellular Phone Towers.
Does RF radiation cause cancer?
Researchers use two main types of studies to try to determine if something might cause cancer.
Lab studies: In studies done in the lab, animals are exposed to a chemical or physical agent (such as RF energy) to see if it causes tumors or other health problems. Researchers might also expose normal human cells in a lab dish to see if it causes the types of changes that are seen in cancer cells. It’s not always clear if the results from these types of studies will apply to humans, but lab studies allow researchers to carefully control for other factors that might affect the results and to answer some basic science questions.
Studies in people: Another type of study looks at cancer rates in different groups of people. Such a study might compare the cancer rate in a group exposed to something like RF energy to the rate in a group not exposed to it, or compare it to what the expected cancer rate would be in the general population. But sometimes it can be hard to know what the results of these studies mean, because many other factors might affect the results.
Often neither type of study provides enough evidence on its own, so researchers usually look at both lab-based and human studies when trying to figure out if something causes cancer.
Studies done in the lab
Most lab studies done so far have supported the idea that RF waves don't have enough energy to damage DNA directly. Because of this, it’s not clear how RF radiation might be able to cause cancer.
A few studies have reported evidence of biological effects that could be linked to cancer, but this is still an area of research.
A study by the US National Toxicology Program (NTP) exposed large groups of lab rats and mice to types of RF energy used in cell phones. The animals were exposed over their entire bodies for about 9 hours a day, starting before birth and continuing for up to 2 years. The study found an increased risk of rare heart tumors called malignant schwannomas in the male rats exposed to RF radiation, as well as possible increased risks of certain types of tumors in the brain and adrenal glands. However, there was no clear increased risk among female rats or among male or female mice in the study. The male rats also lived longer than rats who were not exposed to RF radiation, for unclear reasons. Some aspects of this study make it hard to know what these results might mean for people, but the results add evidence to the idea that RF radiation might potentially impact human health.
Studies in people
Studies of people who may have been exposed to RF radiation at their jobs (such as people who work around or with radar equipment, those who service communication antennae, and radio operators) have found no clear increase in cancer risk.
A number of studies have looked at the possible link between cell phones and cancer. Although some studies have shown a possible link, many others have not. The possible link between cell phones and cancer is hard to study for many reasons, including the relatively short time that cell phones have been in widespread use, changes in the technology over time, and difficulty in estimating each person’s exposure. The possible link between cell phones and cancer risk is discussed in detail in Cellular Phones.
What do expert agencies say?
Several national and international agencies study exposures and substances in the environment to determine if they can cause cancer. (An exposure or substance that causes cancer or helps cancer grow is called a carcinogen.) The American Cancer Society looks to these organizations to evaluate the risks based on evidence from laboratory, animal, and human research studies.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is part of the World Health Organization. One of its goals is to identify causes of cancer. IARC has stated that there is limited evidence that RF radiation causes cancer in animals and humans, and classifies RF radiation as “possibly carcinogenic to humans” (Group 2B). This was based on the finding of a possible link in at least one study between cell phone use and a specific type of brain tumor. IARC considers the evidence overall to be “limited” because of the conflicting findings and methodologic limitations in some of the studies.
(For more information on the classification system IARC uses, see Known and Probable Human Carcinogens.)
The other main agencies that classify cancer-causing exposures (carcinogens), including the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the US National Toxicology Program (NTP), have not formally classified RF radiation as to its cancer-causing potential.
Does RF radiation cause any other health problems?
Studies in the lab
In animals, the main effects of exposure to RF are related to heating (sometimes called thermal effects). High doses of RF radiation can raise body temperature, even to the point of being fatal. Focusing RF radiation on one area of the body can lead to burns and the breakdown of tissue. When RF waves are focused on the eye, it can cause cataracts to form.
It isn’t clear what effects, if any, RF radiation has at levels of exposure too low to produce heating.
High doses of RF radiation can cause injuries through heating. For example, some people accidentally exposed to large amounts of RF radiation from radar equipment have developed severe burns. But it’s not clear if exposure to lower levels of RF radiation, even over long periods of time, can have harmful health effects.
People who are near microwave radar equipment can be exposed to enough pulsed microwave radiation (a type of RF radiation) that they begin to hear clicking noises. This is sometimes called RF hearing and does not seem to cause long term health problems.
Although there is concern that people exposed to low levels of microwaves over long periods of time in their jobs could have an increased risk of cataracts or loss of fertility (in men), this has not been seen in large studies.
How can I avoid exposure to RF radiation?
Because sources of RF radiation are so common in the modern environment, there is no way to completely avoid exposure to it. It may be possible to lower your exposure to RF radiation by avoiding jobs with increased RF exposure, keeping away from appliances and equipment that use RF, and using devices that allow mobile phones to be used without placing them against the ear. Still, it isn’t clear that doing so will be helpful in terms of health risks.
Israeli Study Finds That Human Sweat Ducts Act as “Antennas” for 5G Radiation
What’s further disturbing about 5G radiation is how the human body responds to and processes it.
Dr. Ben-Ishai from The Hebrew University of Jerusalem discovered as part of a recent investigation that human skin acts as a type of receptor for 5G radiation, drawing it in like an antenna.
“This kind of technology, which is in many of our homes, actually interacts with human skin and eyes,” writes Arjun Walia for Collective Evolution about the study.
“… human sweat ducts act like a number of helical antennas when exposed to these wavelengths that are put out by the devices that employ 5G technology,” he adds.
5G radiation uses same frequencies as Pentagon’s “Active Denial System” crowd control weapons
The U.S. military is also already well-versed in 5G technology, having long utilized it as a non-lethal form of crowd control. The same 5G wavelengths utilized in the military’s so-called Active Denial System, or ADS, are described as “weapons,” seeing as how they penetrate the top 1/64th of an inch layer of skin when directed at human bodies.
According to reports, ADS 5G is so invasive on human skin that it actually causes an intolerable heating sensation – this being the intended outcome in order to disperse a crowd, or to cause people to flee the area being targeted.
U.S., Russian, and even Chinese military forces all utilize 5G as a crowd control weapon, which bodes ominous for its eventual release into local communities all around the world.
This is why many such communities are fighting back, as best they can, against this 5G onslaught that unfortunately appears to be an inevitable reality, despite how loudly the public says: no way!
“This technology is becoming ubiquitous in top world militaries, demonstrating how genuinely effective this radio frequency energy can be at causing harm to humans and anything else,” warns Terence Newton from Waking Times.
“The fight over 5G is heating up at the community level, and awareness of this important issue is spreading fast.”
High-frequency 5G Harms Oxygen Molecules + 'Heme' Production
By Anna Von Reitz
February 24, 2020
"... there is a cause of every disease and illness, and perhaps even death."
The superficial cause is toxemia -- the build up of toxins in our blood.
The actual cause, however, is lack of oxygen and things that screw up our ability to use oxygen at a cellular level.
Read that again. There is a single underlying cause of all disease and that actual cause is: lack of oxygen and things that screw up our ability to use oxygen at the cellular level.
The resulting toxemia kills us, but it is the lack of oxygen that allows and promotes the toxemia.
How do I know this and know it for certain? It's a combination of research studies and clinical results, epidemiology, a long, long trail of things that should be present and aren't, relationships between the causes and effects and the timing of causes and effects over time, research I was party to forty years ago--and the present virus scare that made me go back and revisit all the above.
Don't be afraid of the coronavirus. We know how to beat the virus. Be afraid of the vaccine.
The South Koreans have already beaten the coronavirus with simple oxygen therapy -- and that, too, is part and parcel of the story.
That said, let's review the recently accumulated, re-accumulated, and re-integrated facts:
1. Electromagnetic fields are known to adversely affect porphyrins, which are pigment enzymes (special proteins that enable chemical reactions) which means that these proteins are light sensitive. They can 'perceive' EM energy, so that is why are impacted by EM fields.
2.The effect of EM fields on these special proteins hobbles their ability to produce 'Heme' -- the vital part of hemoglobin that allows it to attach to and carry oxygen throughout the body. A portion of our hemoglobin is disabled outright and a portion is normal and a portion is crippled, but still functioning to a degree.
3. So raw 'un-modulated' EM fields, which are what we are bathed in 24/7, inhibit the ability of our blood to carry oxygen to our tissues and cells, which then interferes with everything else.
4. The more we are exposed to high intensity EM, the more severely our blood and its oxygen-carrying capacity is impacted. There is the real danger of 5G and the reason it kills whether it is overtly weaponized or not.
5. This is why chronic diseases are the great scourges of industrialized societies worldwide-- cancer, diabetes, and coronary disease--were virtually unknown a hundred years ago--and only became common in tandem with the expansion of the electrical grid. There's your cause and your effect.
6. Cancer is known to shrivel up and die in the presence of oxygen, and if you look a bit deeper into the disease mechanisms of diabetes and coronary and arterial diseases, you will see that lack of oxygen and lack of complete oxidation--resulting in the build up of toxic waste products--is central to both those diseases as well.
7. At the same time that EM exposure is wreaking silent havoc with our blood and blood's ability to carry oxygen, oxygen levels in the atmosphere are being depleted at a frightening rapid rate, having lost 5% of the total atmosphere in the past sixty years. This is a double whammy.
8. Not only is our ability to capture and use oxygen being harmed, but there is less oxygen available as a result of deforestation and pollution of the oceans and large fresh water lakes.
9. The fact that South Korea has been able to cure coronavirus via the use of simple oxygen therapy simply adds the icing to the cake of conclusions we've drawn here.
10. This also explains why Keshe water (GANS) kills the coronavirus and 'resets' the EM balance. Go to YouTube now and watch Keshe's DIY called 'One Cup, One Life'.
Our body's metabolism and immune functions are both crippled by lack of oxygen.
March 2, 2019 -
... the 5G frequency is connected to the 60 GHz millimeter-wave band — 5G applications will require unlocking of new spectrum bands in higher frequency ranges above 6 GHz to 100 GHz and beyond (5G is to start initially with sub-6GHz moving as quickly into 6GHz and above as the network advancement allows). This will allow the utilization of sub-millimeter and millimeter waves to allow ultra-high rates of data to be transmitted in the same amount of time as compared with previous deployments of RF/MW radiation. 5G represents a massive step up from 3G at 1.8-2.5 GHz, and 4G at 2-8 GHz, placing it well within the microwave category. This frequency is miles away from the natural resonance of 8Hz that our bodies are accustomed to, and far, far above current EMF levels (which are already damaging enough).
High-frequency 60GHz 5G has already been shown to interfere with the oxygen molecules we breathe. Joe Imbriano has studied the molecular level of impact 5G will have and made an alarming discovery – 5G’s 60GHz bandwidth was selected for a specific reason. Imbriano thinks this reason may be to negatively affect the oxygen we breathe as part of a population control mechanism: “60GHz is the frequency of oxygen molecule absorption. Oxygen molecules have electrons that they share with each other, oxygen is a diatomic molecule. What we breathe are two oxygen molecules bonded together with the electrons that they share.”
When the oxygen molecule is hit with 60GHz 5G waves, these waves affect the orbital resonance properties of those shared electrons. It is those shared electrons that bind to the hemoglobin in our blood.
In addition to disrupting oxygen absorption, 5G will alter the iron and magnetite function respectively of the hemoglobin and pineal gland. Hemoglobin and the pineal gland have a magnetic compound within them. The magnetic field disruption is already happening, but, with 5G, this disruption will be more seriously amplified. Hemoglobin is a very complex ferromagnetic compound. If we interfere with the orbital spin properties of diatomic oxygen’s (O2) electrons via 5G, our ability to absorb oxygen will be significantly hampered, creating slow suffocation.
Because of this additional factor, with or without 5G, people should avoid 60 GHz WiFi systems in any case. At 60GHz the frequencies also impair the body’s ability to produce vitamin D and melanin.
In this context, 5G and the 60 GHz delivery system is an overt attack on the human body.
What’s the Difference Between Bacterial and Viral Infections?
Bacteria and viruses can cause many common infections.
But what are the differences between these two kinds of infectious organisms?
The biggest difference between viruses and bacteria is that viruses must have a living host - like a plant or animal - to multiply, while most bacteria can grow on non-living surfaces.
Bacteria are tiny microorganisms that are made up of a single cell. They’re very diverse and can have a large variety of shapes and structural features.
Bacteria can live in almost every conceivable environment, including in or on the human body.
Only a handful of bacteria cause infections in humans. These bacteria are referred to as pathogenic bacteria.
Viruses are another type of tiny microorganism, although they’re even smaller than bacteria. Viruses are the smallest and simplest life form known. They are 10 to 100 times smaller than bacteria. Like bacteria, they’re very diverse and have a variety of shapes and features.
Viruses are parasitic. That means they require living cells or tissue in which to grow.
Viruses can invade the cells of your body, using the components of your cells to grow and multiply. Some viruses even kill host cells as part of their life cycle.
How are bacterial infections transmitted?
Many bacterial infections are contagious, meaning that they can be transmitted from person to person. There are many ways this can occur, including:
- close contact with a person who has a bacterial infection, including touching and kissing
- contact with the body fluids of a person who has an infection, particularly after sexual contact or when the person coughs or sneezes
- transmission from mother to child during pregnancy or birth
- coming into contact with surfaces contaminated with the bacteria, such as doorknobs or faucet handles and then touching your face, nose, or mouth
Additionally, consuming contaminated food or water can also lead to an infection.
What are common bacterial infections?
Some examples of bacterial infections include:
urinary tract infection (UTI)
bacterial food poisoning
How are viral infections transmitted?
Like bacterial infections, many viral infections are also contagious.
They can be transmitted from person to person in many of the same ways, including:
- coming into close contact with a person who has a viral infection
- contact with the body fluids of a person with a viral infection
- transmission from mother to child during pregnancy or birth
- coming into contact with contaminated surfaces
What are common viral infections?
Some examples of viral infections include:
human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
West Nile virus
COVID-19 is another illness caused by a virus. This virus commonly causes:
shortness of breath
Call emergency medical services if you experience the following symptoms:
consistent pain or tightness in the chest
Is my cold bacterial or viral?
The common cold is a viral, not a bacterial, infection.
A cold can cause a stuffy or runny nose, sore throat, and low fever, but is a cold bacterial or viral?
The common cold is caused by a number of different viruses, although rhinoviruses are most often the culprit.
There’s not much you can do to treat a cold except wait it out and use over-the-counter (OTC) medications to help relieve your symptoms.
In some cases, a bacterial infection (secondary) may develop during or following a cold.
Common examples of secondary bacterial infections include:
sinus infections (sinusitis)
You may have developed a bacterial infection if:
symptoms last longer than 10 to 14 days
symptoms continue to get worse rather than improving over several days
you have a higher fever than normally observed with a cold
You should avoid using mucus color to determine whether you have a viral or bacterial infection.
There’s a long-held belief that green mucus indicates a bacterial infection that requires antibiotics. In fact, green mucus is actually caused by substances released by your immune cells in response to a foreign invader.
You can have green mucus due to many things, including:
Is my stomach bug bacterial or viral?
When you experience symptoms such as nausea, diarrhea, or abdominal cramps, you likely have a stomach bug. But is it due to a viral or bacterial infection?
Stomach bugs generally fall into two categories based on how they’re acquired:
1. Gastroenteritis is an infection of the digestive tract. It’s caused by coming into contact with stool or vomit from a person with the infection.
2. Food poisoning is an infection of the digestive tract caused by consuming contaminated food or liquids.
Gastroenteritis and food poisoning can be caused by both viruses and bacteria. Regardless of the cause, many times your symptoms will go away in a day or two with good home care.
However, symptoms that last longer than 3 days, cause bloody diarrhea, or lead to severe dehydration may indicate a more severe infection that requires prompt medical treatment.
How are infections diagnosed?
Sometimes your doctor may be able to diagnose your condition based on your medical history and your symptoms.
For example, conditions like measles or chickenpox have very characteristic symptoms that can be diagnosed with a simple physical examination.
Additionally, if there’s a current epidemic of a particular disease, your doctor will factor that into their diagnosis. An example is influenza, which causes seasonal epidemics in the cold months of every year.
If your doctor wants to know what type of organism may be causing your condition, they may take a sample to culture.
Samples that can be used for culture vary by the suspected condition, but they can include:
mucus or sputum
cerebral spinal fluid (CSF)
When a microorganism is cultured, it allows your doctor to identify what’s causing your condition. In the case of a bacterial infection, it can also help them determine which antibiotic may be helpful in treating your condition.
Which infections are treated with antibiotics?
Antibiotics are medications used to treat bacterial infections. There are many types of antibiotics, but they all work to keep bacteria from effectively growing and dividing.
Antibiotics are not effective against viral infections.
Despite the fact that you should only take antibiotics for a bacterial infection, antibiotics are often requested for viral infections; this is dangerous because over-prescribing antibiotics can lead to antibiotic resistance.
Antibiotic resistance occurs when bacteria adapt to be able to resist certain antibiotics. It can make many bacterial infections more difficult to treat.
If you’re prescribed antibiotics for a bacterial infection, take your entire course of antibiotics — even if you begin to feel better after a couple of days. Skipping doses can prevent killing all of the pathogenic bacteria.
How are viral infections treated?
There’s no specific treatment for many viral infections. Treatment is typically focused on relieving symptoms, while your body works to clear the infection.
This can include things like:
- drinking fluids to prevent dehydration
- getting plenty of rest
- using OTC pain medications, such as acetaminophen (Tylenol) or ibuprofen (Motrin, Advil) to relieve aches, pains, and fever
- taking OTC decongestants to help with a runny or stuffy nose
- sucking on a throat lozenge to help ease a sore throat
In some cases, your doctor may prescribe an antiviral medication to help treat your condition.
Antiviral medications inhibit the viral life cycle in some way.
Some examples include medications like oseltamivir (Tamiflu) for influenza or valacyclovir (Valtrex) for herpes simplex or herpes zoster (shingles) viral infections.
How to prevent infections
You can follow the tips below to help prevent becoming ill with a bacterial or viral infection:
Practice good hygiene
Be sure to wash your hands before eating, after using the bathroom, and before and after handling food.
Avoid touching your face, mouth, or nose if your hands aren’t clean.
Don’t share personal items such as:
Many vaccines are available to help prevent various viral and bacterial illnesses. Examples of vaccine-preventable diseases include:
Talk to your doctor about the vaccines that are available to you.
Don’t go out if you’re sick
Stay home if you’re ill to help prevent transmitting your infection to other people.
If you must go out, wash your hands frequently and sneeze or cough into the crook of your elbow or into a tissue. Be sure to properly dispose of any used tissues.
Practice safe sex
Using condoms or other barrier methods can help prevent getting sexually transmitted diseases (STDs).
Limiting your number of sexual partners has also been shown to reduce your riskTrusted Source of getting an STD.
Make sure food is cooked thoroughly
Make sure all meats are cooked to the proper temperature. Be sure to thoroughly wash any raw fruits or vegetables before eating.
Don’t let leftover food items sit at room temperature. Instead, refrigerate them promptly.
Protect against bug bites
Be sure to use insect repellent containing ingredients such as DEET or picaridin if you’re going to be outside where insects, such as mosquitoes and ticks, are prevalent.
Wear long pants and long-sleeved shirts, if possible.
Bacteria and viruses cause many common infections, and these infections can be transmitted in many of the same ways.
Sometimes your doctor can diagnose your condition by a simple physical examination. Other times, they may need to take a sample to culture to determine if a bacterial or viral infection is causing your illness.
1. Antibiotics are used to treat bacterial infections.
2. Treatment of viral infections focuses on treating symptoms while the infection runs its course. Although in some cases, antiviral medications may be used.
You can help prevent getting sick with or transmitting bacterial and viral infections by:
practicing good hygiene
staying home when you’re sick
The following summarizes the main features of each disease and actual and/or proposed treatment.
The common cold is a viral infection of the upper respiratory system (nose, throat, sinuses, Eustachian tubes, trachea, larynx, and bronchial tubes).
Rhinoviruses cause about 30%-50% of colds. However, more than 200 different viruses may cause the common cold.
Colds are contagious, can spread from person to person, and have an incubation period of about 1-7 days. A cold's duration (how long it lasts) is about 7-10 days. However, depending upon the viral strain, a cold can last up to 2 weeks.
Colds are a mild upper respiratory illness with a runny, stuffy nose without fever.
Doctors mainly diagnose colds using clinical observation and medical history. No tests are necessary.
Influenza (commonly termed the flu) is a viral infection of the upper respiratory and/or lower respiratory system. Influenza viruses cause the flu.
These viruses usually cause more serious symptoms in the respiratory system than cold-causing viruses.
The flu is contagious, can spread from person to person, and has an incubation period of about 1-4 days. The flu's duration varies from about 5 days to 2 weeks depending upon the severity of the infection.
The flu can become an intense and potentially fatal illness (pneumonia) in some individuals. Hallmarks of the flu include mild to high fever, moderate to severe headache, cough, fatigue, and body aches/pains. Severe flu may have symptoms that develop rapidly and require supportive care.
Doctors diagnose the flu based on clinical symptoms and by readily available lab tests.
COVID-19 (2019 novel coronavirus)
COVID-19 (also termed the Wuhan coronavirus, 2019 novel coronavirus, 2019-nCoV, and others) is a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA coronavirus. It is a new strain of coronavirus (the term corona means crown) responsible for causing a pandemic of serious respiratory problems that started in Wuhan, China.
Researchers believe it originated from infected animals and jumped over to infecting people in a large open seafood/animal market. Also, it has been able to spread from person to person and is rapidly spreading worldwide.
It is related to the SARS and MERS coronaviruses. It has an incubation period ranging from 2-14 days. Person-to-person spread may happen even if the infected person has no symptoms during the incubation period. Infected people may also not be aware they have the virus and may not show symptoms.
The main symptoms of COVID-19 are fever (usually high), moderate to severe coughing, and shortness of breath.
Other symptoms and signs may include a sore throat, diarrhea, body aches and pains, and a stuffy or runny nose.
At first, it seemed to target people over 60 years old and have severe underlying health conditions like heart disease, lung disease, and diabetes, but recent data from Italy suggests that people 20-60 years of age may get the disease at about the same rate.
About 80% recover without specific treatment, while about 20% may require some respiratory support (oxygen and/or ventilator support).
Many coronavirus types infect species of animals that occasionally (or rarely) are able to infect humans.
MERS coronavirus is an example where the virus that usually only infected camels became able to infect humans.
Wuhan coronavirus is similar as the initially infected people frequented an open-air food market that sold fish and animals, including wild animals. Medical researchers currently do not know the animal species infected, but wild animals are a suspected source. However, the rapid spread of the virus was due to person-to-person contact that has been responsible for the wide outbreak of this infection.
Close contact with someone who is infected or with their secretions (for example, cough-generated droplets) or feces is how the virus spreads. Although this virus is contagious, the contagious period of time remains to be determined. Recent findings suggest it may be contagious even in the incubation period when the patient shows no symptoms.
Treatments for COVID-19, flu, and the common cold
Colds: Doctors recommend rest, fluids, and over-the-counter (OTC) medications like ibuprofen (Advil) and acetaminophen (Tylenol). No vaccine is available for the common cold.
Flu: Early treatment with an antiviral drug like oseltamivir (Tamiflu), rest, fluids, and acetaminophen and respiratory support can help if flu symptoms become severe. Vaccines are available to reduce symptoms or prevent the flu.
COVID-19: Medical professionals recommend rest, fluids, acetaminophen, and respiratory support if COVID-19 symptoms become severe. Antiviral drug and vaccine research is very active but none are currently available.
Antibiotics are not indicated for these three viral diseases. However, they may be useful if secondary bacterial infections.
Original version of this video at:
Experts say: "Other viruses that can cause colds include coronavirus, respiratory syncytial virus, influenza and parainfluenza."
Experts say: "Flu is caused by the influenza virus, while the common cold generally is not."
Experts say: "While the common cold may be caused by over 200 distinct and continually evolving viral pathogens; rhinoviruses, coronaviruses and respiratory syncytial viruses appear to be some of the most common."
Experts say: "In individuals with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the common cold can sometimes trigger an exacerbation of their illness, leading to shortness of breath and increased wheezing. Though uncommon, pneumonia can sometimes develop as a secondary infection in individuals with the common cold. For example, coronaviruses, rhinoviruses, and several other cold-causing viruses can cause bronchitis and pneumonia in people with very weakened immune systems."
So, experts say that rhinovirus, influenza virus, and coronavirus can cause the common cold.
How can the influenza virus cause both the flu and common cold? Or is the common cold mostly bacteria, and is the flu is a viral detoxification or a cleansing, as asserted by Tom Barnett at the 40:35 mark in the video link below?
Experts say: "While some of the symptoms of the common cold and flu may be similar, patients with the common cold typically have a milder illness than patients with the flu. Cold viruses target mainly the upper respiratory tract (nose, sinuses, and throat). Patients with flu viruses usually appear more ill and have a more abrupt onset of illness with fever, chills, headache, substantial muscle and body aches, dry cough, and extreme weakness."
Experts say: "The common cold and influenza are self-limiting illnesses that will resolve spontaneously with time and expectant management. Home remedies and medical treatments are directed at alleviating the symptoms associated with the common cold while the body fights off the infection. The common cold needs to run its natural course, and most people with the common cold will recover within seven to 10 days. However, certain viruses may take up to three weeks to completely resolve."
Experts say: "The flu and the common cold are both respiratory illnesses but they are caused by different viruses."
Experts say: "More severe symptoms, such as fever or muscle aches, may be a sign that you have the flu rather than a cold."
Experts say: "In general, the flu is worse than the common cold, and symptoms are more common and intense. Colds are usually milder than the flu. People with colds are more likely to have a runny or stuffy nose."
Experts say: "Some people do not suffer any symptoms when infected with the cold virus, perhaps because their immune system reacts differently to the virus. Sometimes, bacteria can infect the ears or sinuses during this viral infection — this is known as a secondary bacterial infection — and can be treated with antibiotics."
How can you to tell when you need antibiotics to treat a bacterial infection, such as with the ear, nose or throat, or simply take a wait-and-see approach as your body works to clear a viral infection?
Experts say: "There is laboratory testing available to confirm the diagnoses of influenza, but health care professionals make a diagnosis of flu primarily based on classic flu symptoms rather than laboratory tests."
At the 40:35 mark in the video below, Tom Barnett says, "As far as viral infections are concerned, you can catch a cold but not a virus."
https://open.lbry.com/@Antwniaco:1/Social-Distancing-1:f?t=2632 (transcript below)
You cannot catch a virus. Why can't you catch a virus? A virus is not a living thing. You can't catch something that isn't alive.
What is a virus, anyway?
A virus is nothing more than a solvent. And this solvent is created within the cells of the body. This is why you cannot catch a virus. Viruses are created cellulary.
The body can create hundreds of thousands of different viruses at any time.
Why does a cell need to create a virus or solvent?
It's created in response to the build-up of toxicity that we have in our bodies.
How does a cell become toxic?
A lot of people think it's totally fine to eat supermarket food, and microwave it; and to get flu shots injected into you very year; and to drink tap water...
What is the flu?
A flu is a viral detoxification or a cleansing; a cold, on the other hand, is mostly bacteria.
And, for the most part, what needs cleaning out of the cells are environmental toxins such as heavy metals, plastics, any type of environmental or industrial pollutants, the chemicals that you use in your home to clean things with, the things you put in your body, and so on and so forth.
Now, a virus does not attack cell tissue. What happens is that a virus, which is a solvent, breaks down the toxic residue within a cell that creates essentially a toxic waste. So that's why you feel ill if you've got a viral infection.
And, what can happen if there's a lot of toxins in your cells? You're going to create a lot of toxic waste that viruses break down. So what happens is, if there's too much of it, it can actually cause cell damage. And, in extreme cases, it can cause cell death.
You can't catch a bat flu off a counter by being around your friends. Viruses are specific to specific cells in the body. Hepatitis, for example, effects the liver. Does that effect the heart? Do they have lung problems, do they have brain or gonad problems?
Likewise, a virus that attacks the lungs will not effect the kidneys. Because the virus is specific to specific cells in the body.
Because a virus is not transmissible within your own body, it should make sense that a virus is not transmissible between people. And it's especially impossible for a virus to make the jump between species. This is why you can't get an avian flu, a swine flu, a bat flu, a monkey flu, or any other flu that affects an animal except for one way, and we will get to that.
So, how is it that a number of people get a virus at the same time? If it is created within the cells of your body, how is it that a lot of people can get it at the same time? If somebody at home, work, sporting club, etc. has a cold, does everybody in that place get a cold? The answer is "no" despite the fact that a bacterial infection can be contagious.
And why can a bacterial or fungal infection be contagious? Because they are living things.
A virus, remember, is not a living thing.
So, how is it that a number of people can get a virus at the same time?
There's an intelligence that runs through all of life. It why seeds know when to germinate. It's why animals know when to mate or to hibernate or to come out of hibernation.
So, the body knows when it's a good time to undergo a cleansing. And it knows when it's a good time from the environment and climatic conditions.
This is why a number of people in the same area can undergo a viral detoxification.
But, then again, does everybody get a viral detoxification at the same time? You already know that the answer is "no". So why is that? Well, they may have already undergone a recent cleansing. They may just be very healthy people, and they're always watching the way they eat, the way they think, the way they move, the way they sleep.
The intelligence that runs through all of life means that the body knows that it does not have to undergo a viral detoxification at that point in time.
Additionally, our bodies all talk to each other, particularly, our immune systems.
This is one of the ways that we're attracted to the opposite sex: we can sense their immune system. It's how we know that we can create a genetically diverse offspring and that we'll have the greatest chance of survival. We sense another person's immune system partly by scent, and this has been taken away quite a lot in modern life: things like perfumes and colognes, and especially when a woman goes on the pill (it affects her ability to sense a man's immune system).
So, what is this coronavirus really about?
Not everybody buys into what they hear from the media.
There is actually one way that you can catch a virus: by having it injected into your bloodstream.
So, remembering a virus is created cellularly as a response to your internal environment, which means, yes, taking responsibility for your thoughts, actions and beliefs (all beliefs being a form of ignorance).
So, how can a human get a virus from a pig or a bat or a bird or a monkey? Remembering that viruses used to be blamed on other races, and remembering that viruses cannot cross species, and remember that you can't even catch it from within the same species, means it has be be created within animal tissue.
We are human animals. So, the way you can create a virus is this: you can get sick and unhealthy animal tissue and put it in a petri dish, and it will create a virus; and you can incubate that virus, and the only reason it can stay "alive" (even though it's not alive)—the only reason a virus can be there and be in play—is because it is taking care of toxicity within cells in animal tissue.
So, what happens with that incubated virus is this: it's sterilized and put into a vaccine. So, straight away you don't want that because that's bad news. Then when it's added to 70-80 chemicals—you definitely don't want that in your body.
So, when these viruses are loaded into vaccines, and people are getting their flu shots and all their other vaccines, that's the only way you can get animal tissue into your own bloodstream.
Scientist Dr. Judy Mikovits PhD. in an interview with Patrick Bet-David, EXPOSES Fauci’s medical CORRUPTION (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgnBldI7KPY), said:
Force everybody to get the vaccines so they can say you had it all along. You're going to kill the people with these viruses and you're going to bury us and call it COVID.
One hundred million are carrying infection now because we ramped up the vaccine program. The motive is to cover up. Kill the victims and make sure nobody ever exhumes them and sees that there really was no evidence of this infection, COVID, in their deaths, but look what else was here.
Make them wear masks. If you wear a mask you will die because it activates your latent viruses and drives the pathology in yourself. These people are most at risk: the last thing they can do is wear a mask and stay out of the sunshine. Doing these things is going to activate internally, and you're going to suppress your immune system and you're going to cause that fire to go out of control because you woke up all those sleeping viruses. That's what the clinical data supports.
Most of our patients will use the term "air hunger". So, using the ventilators is killing people because you have to paralyze them with fentanyl and other drugs in order to put that ventilator down their throat.
When they're desaturating their oxygen, and their iron is leaving and going into the blood, that adds to the flame, that adds to the signature disease of chronic fatigue syndrome, which is called XMRV.
That paper we published in the spring of 2011 is exactly the one the're calling COVID signature of disease.
So, what are we really looking at? It's the biggest cover-up. They've got to do something.
We got all the data, folks. They didn't succeed at getting the data and samples. So, every one of them goes to jail.
And the point about 2014: I forgot the dead man's trigger on the book because that would mean Dr Frank and I would be killed. What's the dead man's trigger on the book?
When Frank was forced into retirement in May 2014, in the big recycling bin, he brought all of the samples and all of the paper to my house and my apartment in Carlsbad. They told him to throw it away. He threw it in the recycling bin, and he was watched by an armed guard at Fort Detrick when he was leaving there. And the armed guard left at 5 o'clock, and Frank never left at 5 o'clock. And he simply just put it in the wrong place.
So, Frank knocked on my door in May 2014 and said, "I don't know how this shit got into my moving van." I took one look at that recycle bin and I could see every paper because investigators have to keep a copy of the records of everybody on the project.
They took all of my work, and told Frank to "William Thompson-style" destroy the data. But Frank knew it was a federal offense.
So, I spent the next three days scanning every bit of it into hard drives. And them I made an appointment with my attorney, and we called the FBI, and then handed them that hard drive (I have the receipt for it). Frank and I taped every word of the conversation.
In 2014 I had a lawsuit that was under seal until October 2019, when I gave exactly this talk in 20 quick slides, showing the association with Tony Fauci and everything I just told you [Patrick] today (the government hadn't decided whether they were going to pick up this whistleblower key tamriko racketeering and conspiracy case).
The Monday after I gave that Friday talk, the case was dismissed with prejudice, meaning I can't come back again—"you made it all up for the glory of whatever it is in your books." That was the explosive talk that really changed everything, because people saw it.
Valuetainment (Patrick Bet-David), May 8, 2020 - My response to Dr Judy Mikovits Video Banned by YouTube:
Read the article, MIT Technology Review:
Still want to watch the interview? Visit his site:It is far beyond the realm of possibility to get animal tissue into your bloodstream by the way of being around people or from surfaces or from the air or from any other way other than injection.
So, you really want to question all this advice that's being given out and that this virus is killed upon impact with heat or anything else, because a virus isn't "alive" in the first place; therefore, how can you kill something that is never alive?
So, there's only two things you need to do: (1) don't get a flu shot; actually, don't get any shots, and (2) don't stay in your house.
You ought to be outside getting sunlight and fresh air if you want your body to run optionally and not need to go into a viral detoxification.
There is something else you can do, actually, and that is turn off your TV and social media to alleviate some of that fear and stress. Whose verifying these deaths from a "worldwide" pandemic", that they're not from any flu? Which, by the way, flu viruses kills half a million to a million people every year.
The flu is not a natural virus within your own body for beneficial purposes: the only way you can get it is to have an injection.
You're not actually helping anything by self-isolating and telling other people what they should be doing with their lives.
Most people don't have any real idea about how the mind and body work. If this goes down the way people are letting it go down, you can say goodbye to what you have left of your rights and freedoms in this world.
Get outside, do normal things. Watch what's going on out there. If you sit in your house, counting days in self-isolation, counting death tolls on the TV, you are literally paving the way to losing your rights and freedoms, and you're going to come out of your house with less than what you had when you went in.
If you don't use your own mind, someone else is going to use it for you, and it's not going to be to your benefit.
On the youtube video "The second wave-the planned 60GHz millimeter wave attack in schools" by The Fullerton Informer, Perry Pierce wrote:
Germ THEORY has been debunked since 1918, when the Boston Health Department failed to infect a single one of the 300 healthy subjects they contaminated with the bodily fluids of "Spanish Flu" carriers.
Viruses do not exist the way most have been taught to believe.
That is two centuries old medical/corporate (Rockefeller, Carnegie, Gates, Morgan, etc.) propaganda at work.
Viruses are Exosomes - solvents for toxic cells.
Allopathic medical doctors are trained in Rockefeller funded medical schools without any real nutritional knowledge, taking about two weeks of classes in all their years of study.
Abraham Flexner was hired to write up the Rockefeller/Carnegie/Ford/AMA inspired and funded 1910 FLEXNER REPORT, which was used as an excuse to defund, defame and eventually eliminate the holistic medical service and culture.
Louis Pasteur was another scientist in league with the Rockefellers, and he pushed the Germ Theory, which is still pushed as fact by the medical schools.
Terrain Theory, put into play by Pasteur's rival, Henry Bechamp, says our bodies express bacteria and viruses as cleaning and alarm-messenger agents to other cells.
To sell drugs and vaccines, pharmaceutical-backed companies, doctors and schools ran with Pasteur's Germ Theory and tried to blamed every disease possible on it.
Scurvy, for example, was blamed on infection, yet proven to be caused by a lack of vitamin C. When kids ate asbestos-laden wall chips, doctors and scientists blamed their parents for being stupid, rather than themselves for blanketing the planet with harmful drugs, toxins and chemicals.
The "progress" driven by the big money in the last couple centuries saw a lot of toxins from lead, arsenic, DDT, asbestos and many pesticides be splayed upon the public.
When people got sick their corrupt scientists blamed it on an "infectious" agent that is present during the very toxicity caused by their employers.
This industry causes 440,000 deaths a year in America alone due to "medical errors" (partially defined as an unintended outcome even under correctly administered care) and over 100,000 annual deaths due to legal drugs. This is only from the reports we know about.
Taking into account hackeneyed "studies", unreported medical errors and overdoses, and unreported adverse vaccine effects that cause all sorts of chronic diseases, neurological disorders and death, it's abundantly clear that the pharmaceutical-backed medical industry is not aimed at healing the population, but rather, at reducing their prolificity, health and power through deceptions of the highest degree.
Take Polio: As farmers and communities began to spray the first arsenic-based "Paris Green" in the late 1800s to control insects, and then lead-arsenate, more cases of paralysis and poisoning appeared, but with no detectable source of "infection."
When the public began to question possible toxicity from pesticides, they were shouted down and mocked - but not challenged with actual scientific data.
"Reports of children killed by arsenic poisoning began to surface, and authorities who had worked tirelessly to enforce the mandatory application of pesticides blamed the deaths on improper spraying techniques by reckless farmers." - The Moth and the Iron Lung
DDT was invented in Germany in 1873.
The first recorded case of paralytic polio was in Sweden around 1886. And back then, all types of paralysis were diagnosed as polio. According to the World Health Organization, a vaccine strain of polio is running uncontrolled across Africa right now.
DDT was in widespread use across America for years and is still in widespread use in many "third world" countries. At the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research (now Rockefeller University) it was Abraham’s older brother Simon Flexner who was frantically poking around in the bone marrows of lab animals to find/create/pass on the polio virus.
Scientists would go on to drill holes into the brains of monkeys and pour toxic spinal gunk into it until achieving the desired results: One monkey died and another got paralyzed and then some. This was heralded as the polio "vaccine".
So in stark contrast to the claim that vaccines save lives, it's the vaccines themselves that are a big problem.
So, how was polio "eradicated"? The corporate elite simply stopped spraying everyone with pesticides, rolled out a toxic vaccine, and then took credit for helping people, while getting rich from the misery they caused in the first place!
At the Health And Human Rights Summit in Tucson, Arizona, on March 12, 2020, doctor and anthroposophist Thomas Cowan says every time a fundamentally new electrical technology is introduced, we see a pandemic.
The following is part of his presentation.
After the Spanish flu pandemic in 1918, Rudolf Steiner was asked, "What was this all about?"
And he said, "Viruses are simply excretions of a toxic cell."
Viruses are pieces of DNA or RNA, a few other proteins. Viruses happen when the cell is poisoned. They're not the cause of anything. When the cells get poisoned, they try to purify themselves by excreting debris, which we call viruses.
If you go to the current theory of viruses, you will see that it is the current thinking of what the virus really is.
In every pandemic in the last 100 years there was a quantum leap in the electrification of the earth.
In late fall 1917, there was the introduction of radio waves around the world. So, what happened in 1918? The Spanish flu pandemic.
Whenever you expose any biological system to a new electromagnetic field, you poison it, and you kill some people, and the rest go into a kind of suspended animation--they live a little bit longer and sicker.
The next pandemic started in WWII with the introduction of radar equipment all over the earth, blanketing the entire earth in radar fields--the first time humans have ever been exposed to that.
In 1968 there was the Hong Kong flu--we put satellites emitting radioactive frequencies in the Van Allen belt, and within six months we had a new viral pandemic.
Why viral? Because when the people are poisoned, they excrete toxins--it look like a virus and people think it's a flu epidemic. They were not able to demonstrate contagion.
You can read about this in a book called "The Invisible Rainbow" by Arthur Firstenberg, who chronicles all the steps in the electrification of the earth and how, within six months, there was a new flu pandemic all over the world.
How did it go from Kansas to South Africa in two weeks, so that the entire world got the symptoms at the same time in spite of the fact that the mode of transportation was horseback and boats? There's no explanation for it; they just say, "We don't know how that happened."
But, when you think about it, with these radio waves and other frequencies that some of you have in your pocket and on your wrist, you can send a signal to Japan and it arrives instantaneously.
So any of you who don't beleive there is an electromagnetic field that communicates globally within seconds, is not paying attention to this.
There has been a dramatic and quantum leap in the last six months with the electrification of the earth. And I'm sure a lot of you know what that is. It's called 5G, where they now have 20,000 radiation-emitting satellites, just like the radiation-emitting thing in your pocket and on your wrist and that you use all the time.
That is not compatible with health. That is a water-destructuring device.
And for any of you who say, "We're not electrical beings, we're just physical matter, then don't bother doing an EKG or an EEG or a nerve conduction test.
We are electrical beings, and the chemicals are only the byproducts of those electrical impulses.
The first completely blanketed 5G city in the world: Wuhan, China.
So, when you start thinking about this, we are in existential crisis here, folks, the likes of which human-kind has never seen.
And I don't want to go all Old-Testament prophet on you, but this is something that is unprecedented: the putting of 100,000 satellites in the very blanket of the earth.
This actually has something to do with the vaccine question. I had a patient that came in who was totally fine, a surfer, who works as an electrician, putting in WIFI systems for very wealthy people. Electricians have a very high mortality rate, but he was fine. Then he breaks his arm and gets a metal plate put in his arm. Three months later he couldn't get out of bed, with heart irregularities, just total collapse.
The susceptibility has to do with how much metal you have in your body as well as the quality of water in your cells. So, if you start injecting aluminum in people, they become receptors for absorbing increased electromagnetic fields, and that is a perfect storm for the kind of deterioration of the species, which is what we're now experiencing.
Here's a quote from Rudolph Steiner--and, by the way, this was around 1917, so it was a different time--“In times when there were no electrical currents, when the air was not swarming with electrical influences, it was easier to be human. For this reason, in order to be human at all today, it is necessary to expend much stronger spiritual capacities than was necessary a century ago."
Whatever you can do to increase your spiritual capacity... because it's really hard being human beings these days.
Documentary Acute Encephalitis Lethargica (1925), Wellcome Library
“Please get up.” He had asked her. Following a brief pause, she complied; her movements were slow and depressed; her gait tilted. She often paused, holding a position as if frozen in time. Soon, without further probing, she fell back into a stupor. All the while, she was aware of her surroundings.
In stark contrast, the doctor recalled solemnly, was that 15-year-old boy with paranoia. His mother took him in due to sleep complaints – his sleep pattern had completely inverted. Three days later, his gaze became permanently slanted; his tongue and limbs contorted into uncomfortable positions. An equally macabre shift occurred in his mind: he became increasingly paranoid and anxious, mixed with bouts of agitation. He developed a vocal tick and an obsession with compulsively touching his body. Eight months later, he showed no signs of remission.
The two patients share one thing in common, Von Economo thought, as he wrote down the title of his manuscript, "Die Encephalitis lethargica": An infection by an unidentified virus, transmitting in an unknown manner across continental Europe.
Little did he know that, by the end of the epidemic in 1927, the virus would had spread across the globe, taking the lives of at least half a million people.
Those spared from death were left in broken bodies, trapped in their shattered minds.
The disease stages of a “sleepy” brain
Encephalitis lethargica (EL) literally translates to “brain inflammation with lethargy”.
Reports of the virus can be dated back to the age of Aristotle; however, the virus’ most ferocious rampage occurred between 1917-1926.
The disease is commonly known as “sleepy sickness”. Don’t be fooled by the innocent sounding name: one-thirds of those infected die, another third develop Parkinson’s-like symptoms that haunt them for life, and only one third may recover relatively unscarred.
The initial stages of EL infection seem like that of any other nasty bug: fever, sour throat, headache and general lethargy. The infected, unaware of the pathogen’s true nature, battles flu symptoms with bed rest and water, thus giving EL virus ample time to spread across the brain.
Autopsies have confirmed that the virus first and foremost causes infection in the hypothalamus, a small region at the base of the brain. This region controls our vital functions, including breathing, body temperature, hunger and sleep.
Viral multiplication causes severe inflammation in the hypothalamus leading to its dysfunction. The EL virus then jumps to other areas of the brain, including the thalamus, cortex, and midbrain (striatum and substantia nigra), which play a role in reward, addiction and movement.
Infected adults quickly develop extreme daytime lethargy, unwilling to move for even basic bodily needs such as bathroom runs. To the observer, they seem either completely asleep or caught in the “twilight” zone between sleep and wakefulness. The chilling truth is that they’re completely aware of their surroundings – it just takes them incredible effort to talk or to move, perhaps due to the destruction of their basal ganglia. Most never survive this stage of acute infection – when the hypothalamus shuts down, so do basic survival functions. Unable to breathe, victims suffocate in a mockery of “peaceful sleep”.
Those who survive the initial attack are changed for life. Victims often seem like a shadow of their former selves, unable to concentrate and uninterested in life. Then, years or even decades later, they're barraged by an onslaught of motor problems. Patients are unable to freely initiate movement; when they do its painfully slow. They’re plagued by tremors, speech and vision problems and abnormal limb movements. The most unfortunate victims managed to retain their hearing, cognition and reasoning but are left in a state of constant stupor.
This untreatable, irreversible parkinsonism condemned younger survivors to decades of disability.
Forty years after the discovery of post-encephalitic parkinsonism, neurologist Dr. Oliver Sacks famously tried to treat these motor symptoms with L-dopa (used for Parkinson’s Disease). At first it worked, but tolerance grew fast and soon the required dosage exceeded what the body could process. When drug treatment stopped due to toxicity, most patients soon slipped back into a catatonic state. Only a lucky few remained awake.
Infected young children fared even worse. Following a brief stint of lethargy, the virus quickly took over the developing brain, causing rapid changes in personality. At first the child may seem irritable or anxious, often unable to concentrate.
As they grew, approximately one third become explosively violent; they “annoy strangers on the street… abuse them; they tramp, beg, lie, steal… indulge in sexual misbehaviour of every kind (at a young age) and make other dangerous acts.”
In extreme cases, children self-mutilate to the point of extracting their own teeth; some display malicious cruelty toward others, coupled with feigned friendliness in a psychopathic manner.
Their memory and intelligence remained intact; the virus just ate away any sense of morality.
Not much could be done. Many children were arrested or placed into mental institutions; some were subjected to frontal leucotomy. The procedure did not alleviate their destructiveness.
How did EL cause these changes in personality and behaviour?
- Some doctors propose it stems from direct lesions to the cortex and striatum, resulting in lowered cortical inhibition and skewed motivation.
- Others believe that dysfunction in the sensorimotor system in turn disrupted the thalamus and emotion-related circuits, increasing a child’s mental and physical sensitivity to any external stimuli.
- A few doctors opted for a psychoanalytic explanation, in which delinquent behaviours “represented a deep wounding of the ego.”
The face of an enigmatic killer virus
What is the true identity of Encephalitis lethargica? Von Economo famously proposed the cause to be a virus, much to the chagrin of Freudian scholars who preferred a psychoanalytical explanation.
Early on, scientists noticed something peculiar: EL almost always trailed behind flu outbreaks.
The 1920 epidemic, for example, partially overlapped with the Spanish Flu pandemic, which took more than 20 million lives. This overlap in time has led to scientists to speculate that the flu virus may directly be responsible for EL. Although some clinicians and epidemiologists rejected the idea from the get-go, they could not directly study the virus due to its rapid disappearance in the late 1920s.
Almost a century later, in 2001, scientists reopened the case.
They obtained brain samples collected from victims of the epidemic and meticulously analyzed them with modern molecular biology techniques. The samples were well preserved, yet scientists could not find any traces of the flu’s genetic material.
This may indicate that the flu operated in a “hit-and-run” manner, lingering in the body just long enough to lower its immune defences, allowing EL to “swoop in”.
On the contrary, the flu may have triggered the body to produce autoantibodies, which viciously attacked the brain during subsequent EL infection.
Or it could mean the two viruses were completely unrelated; a horrendous coincidence.
A study from 2012 further unmasked the EL virus.
Scientists obtained brain samples of EL victims from both the epidemic age and from several modern cases. Studies using electron microscopy found virus-like particles in brain cells of EL victims (below).
Surprisingly, these particles also appeared in the cell nucleus, where genomic DNA is stored. Hunkering down in the nucleus is a trait of the Enterovirus – the most notorious of which causes polio – leading scientists to suspect that EL may belong to the genus.
Using fluorescent-tagged protein probes specific for poliovirus protein, researchers found proteins similar to that of poliovirus; genetic studies also found ~93% similarity in the genes of EL virus and various Enteroviruses.
Unless samples were contaminated, these data strongly suggest that EL is a type of Enterovirus.
As quickly as it came, the EL virus vanished in 1927, leaving behind hundreds of thousands with broken bodies and shattered minds.
Why are scientists interested in a seemingly obsolete virus, quarantined between the pages of history long gone?
The truth is that EL is far from eradicated. Like the boogyman, the virus occasionally rears its ugly head, infecting both adults and children alike.
Modern case studies show that EL virus often shadows common “sore throat” bacterium* like Strep or Diplococcus, taking a second, brutal swing at already-infected patients.
We still don’t know where it comes from, how it transmits or who is most vulnerable.
Scattered outbreaks are occurring to this day. As of now there is no cure.
* Edit: Thanks @aetiolgy for pointing out that I called Strep a "virus". It's a bacterium.
Case descriptions at the beginning of the article are based on Von Economo's description of patients - nothing made up.
Final word: So...research is "non-essential", huh?
Vilensky JA, Foley P, & Gilman S (2007). Children and encephalitis lethargica: a historical review. Pediatric neurology, 37 (2), 79-84 PMID: 17675021
Dourmashkin RR, Dunn G, Castano V, & McCall SA (2012). Evidence for an enterovirus as the cause of encephalitis lethargica. BMC infectious diseases, 12 PMID: 22715890
Dale RC, Church AJ, Surtees RA, Lees AJ, Adcock JE, Harding B, Neville BG, & Giovannoni G (2004). Encephalitis lethargica syndrome: 20 new cases and evidence of basal ganglia autoimmunity. Brain : a journal of neurology, 127 (Pt 1), 21-33 PMID: 14570817
One thing this fake pandemic did was send me back down the virology rabbit hole, and I have learned many amazing things.
My biggest take from all of it is that when it comes to the subject of virology, it is based in theory, guesses, half-ass studies, half truths, and flat out lies...viruses may not even exist.
The term virus was being used to describe diseases that they could not determine to be bacterial or fungal, since those pathogens can be seen under a regular microscope, where a virus cannot.
The term virus is just Latin for poison, and the first 'virus" was discovered in a tobacco plant, not in a human.
They use the "Spanish Flu" as a scare tactic when it was just as much a hoax as COVID.
WWI was the first time all military men were forced to take vaccines, so all the ones that were sickened and died from that were said to have the Spanish Flu. They also blamed any other deaths on it as well to cover the truth.
The Spanish Flu was neither a virus nor was it from Spain: it was just used to blame all the deaths that were caused by the vaccines.
Vaccines are late 1800's science that should have been done away.
Cizik School of Nursing has created a REMI Platinum Award-winning documentary film that tells the grim cautionary tale of nurses who participated in the Holocaust and abandoned their professional ethics during the Nazi era. The 56-minute film, Caring Corrupted: the Killing Nurses of the Third Reich, casts a harsh light on nurses who used their professional skills to murder the handicapped, mentally ill and infirm at the behest of the Third Reich, and directly participated in genocide.