Showing posts with label Lukewarm Church of the Endtimes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lukewarm Church of the Endtimes. Show all posts

November 6, 2012

Antichrist Must Come First and Stand in the Temple, Showing Himself That He is God, Causing a Great Falling Away from the Christian Faith



The Amazing Parallels of End Time Scriptures

By John Aggson Sr.
Liberty To The Captives

Please check out how all these Scriptures fit together so perfectly: like pieces to a great end time puzzle, they go together to form an even greater overall picture (areas to study closely are “CAPITALIZED”):
1 Thessalonians 4:16: For the Lord Himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: AND THE DEAD IN CHRIST SHALL RISE FIRST. 17) THEN WE WHICH ARE ALIVE AND REMAIN SHALL BE CAUGHT UP TOGETHER WITH THEM IN THE CLOUDS, TO MEET THE LORD IN THE AIR: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.”
The “raising of the dead” (verse 16) is known as the “RESURRECTION” — when the Saints rise up into the air to meet the Lord or are “caught up” (verse 17) — this is known as the “RAPTURE.” According to this passage, both of these things happen together, simultaneously, as one big event! The words “caught up” come from the Latin word “Raptio” from which we get our modern word “Rapture.” Well this SAME “RESURRECTION EVENT” is spoken of in verse 5 of Revelation 20:4-6.
Revelation 20:4-6:
4) And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and JUDGMENT was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the Word of God, and which had not worshiped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. 5) But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. THIS IS THE FIRST RESURRECTION. 6) Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the FIRST RESURRECTION: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with Him a thousand years.
Notice that this “FIRST RESURRECTION” (verse 5) comes AFTER these people were beheaded by the antiChrist for refusing to take the “mark of the beast!?” (verse 4). That means that they were obviously still here during this coming horrendous time and were not raptured out beforehand! If the Rapture and Resurrection occur together, simultaneously (1 Thessalonians 4:16 & 17), then they must also occur together, simultaneously, HERE in Revelation 20:4-6 at THIS RESURRECTION! And since Revelation 20:5 says that this is the “FIRST” resurrection, then there could not have been any “pre-tribulational” — one before it, right?! Otherwise it would not be the FIRST!

It ALSO speaks here of a “JUDGMENT OF THE SAINTS” occurring at this Resurrection, in which they are rewarded for remaining “faithful unto death” during the antiChrist’s persecution (verse 4). It appears that they are raised from the dead in the Rapture and then Judged and rewarded by the Lord accordingly! Well THIS VERY SAME “JUDGMENT EVENT” is spoken of in Revelation 11:15-18 as coming at the blowing of the 7th and LAST TRUMPET of the TRIBULATION PERIOD! This, therefore, places the RAPTURE & RESURRECTION at the BLOWING OF THE 7TH and LAST FINAL TRUMPET OF THE TRIBULATION (see verse 18 below).
Revelation 11:15-18:
15) And the SEVENTH ANGEL SOUNDED; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of His Christ; and He shall reign forever and ever. 16) And the four and twenty elders which sat before God on their seats, fell upon their faces, and worshiped God, 17) Saying, We give thee thanks, O Lord God Almighty, which art, and wast, and art to come; because thou hast taken to thee thy great power and hast reigned. 18) And the nations were angry, and thy wrath is come, AND THE TIME OF THE DEAD THAT THEY SHOULD BE JUDGED, AND THAT THOU SHOULDEST GIVE REWARD UNTO THY SERVANTS THE PROPHETS, AND TO THE SAINTS, AND THEM THAT FEAR THY NAME SMALL AND GREAT; and shouldest destroy them which destroy the earth.
So linking these verses all together by the association of the same events involved in each one we see that this “Rapture / Resurrection / Judgement / and Rewarding of the Saints” comes at the blowing of the LAST TRUMPET! This is exactly what Paul said in 1 Corinthians 15: 51 & 52:
“51) Behold, I show you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, 52) In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the LAST TRUMP: for the TRUMPET shall sound, AND THE DEAD SHALL BE RAISED INCORRUPTIBLE, and we shall be changed.”
You will notice that there is also mention of a TRUMPET being blown in 1 Thessalonians 4:16 & 17 above. There is also mention of a TRUMPET being blown at the Second Coming of the Lord in Matthew 24. As a matter of fact, these SAME THREE ELEMENTS that are found in 1 Thessalonians 4:16 & 17 above (The Coming of the Lord - a Trumpet being blown - and the Rapture, or “Raising up of the Saints” to meet the Lord in the air) are ALSO found in Matthew 24:29-31, as well, and describe what is very obviously this SAME EVENT:
Matthew 24:29-31:
29) IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE TRIBULATION OF THOSE DAYS, shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken: 30) AND THEN SHALL APPEAR THE SIGN OF THE SON OF MAN IN HEAVEN, and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, AND THEY SHALL SEE THE SON OF MAN COMING IN THE CLOUDS OF HEAVEN WITH POWER AND GREAT GLORY. 31) And He shall send His angels with a GREAT SOUND OF A TRUMPET, and they shall GATHER TOGETHER HIS ELECT FROM THE FOUR WINDS, FROM ONE END OF HEAVEN TO THE OTHER. (A big “meeting” of the Saints with the Lord IN THE AIR!)
Notice also that in Matthew 24 that this “Rapture” or “Gathering Together” occurs IMMEDIATELY “AFTER” THE TRIBULATION PERIOD, and not “BEFORE” (verse 29). This is all very strong Scriptural evidence AGAINST a “Pre-Tribulational Rapture” of any sort. In fact, it makes this all quite plain, in BLACK & WHITE!

These verses CANNOT be taken any other way than to mean exactly what they are saying! Most of the verses in the Pre-Tribulational teaching, though, CAN be taken another way and interpreted to mean that, instead of being Raptured out prematurely, we are merely, “kept” by the Lord and protected RIGHT HERE ON THIS EARTH until He returns to take us out! This is what Jesus said in John 17:15:
“I pray NOT that Thou shouldest TAKE THEM OUT OF THE WORLD, but that thou shouldest KEEP THEM FROM THE EVIL.”
This event of the “Gathering Together” of the Saints or “Rapture” is even spoken of in the Psalms!
Psalms 50:3-5:
3) Our God shall come, and shall not keep silence: A fire shall devour before Him, and it shall be very tempestuous round about Him.. 4) He shall call to the heavens from above, and to the earth, that HE MAY JUDGE HIS PEOPLE. 5) “GATHER MY SAINTS TOGETHER UNTO ME; those that have made a covenant with Me by sacrifice.”
Notice the “Coming of the Lord” (verse 3) and the “Judgment” of the Saints (verse 4) and the “Gathering Together” of the Saints to meet the Lord?” (verse 5) all are elements in other passages above that occur at this same time. Remember how 1 Thessalonians 4:16 says that the Lord will “descend from heaven with a shout?” Perhaps Psalms 50:4 & 5 tell us WHAT He will “shout” when He returns!? (See this same event also in Daniel 7:9-14.)

This same “Rapture” term, “Gathering Together,” is ALSO used in 2 Thessalonians 2:1; and like Revelation 20:4-6, this chapter states very plainly and clearly that the antiChrist must come FIRST before Jesus comes to “Gather us Together” unto Himself!!! This IS fact, and I hope you will see the whole reason that this chapter was even written in the first place — to make this one point!
2 Thessalonians chapter 2:1-3:

1) “Now we beseech you, brethren, by the COMING OF OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST, and by OUR GATHERING TOGETHER UNTO HIM.” (From this introduction we can see that this chapter is going to deal with that particular “Coming of the Lord” in which we are “gathered together unto Him.”) (That would be “the Rapture!”)

2) “That ye be not soon shaken in mind or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.” (Someone falsely wrote the Thessalonians and told them they had missed the Rapture, and signed Paul’s name to the letter) (So now Paul tells them not to believe any such false reports, because before Jesus returns to “gather” us unto Himself, the ANTICHRIST MUST COME FIRST and sit in the temple showing himself that he is God; causing a great falling away from the Christian Faith:)
3) Let no man deceive you by any means: FOR THAT DAY SHALL NOT COME EXCEPT THERE COME A FALLING AWAY FIRST, AND THAT MAN OF SIN BE REVEALED, THE SON OF PERDITION; 4) WHO OPPOSETH AND EXALTETH HIMSELF ABOVE ALL THAT IS CALLED GOD, OR THAT IS WORSHIPED; SO THAT HE AS GOD SITTETH IN THE TEMPLE OF GOD, SHOWING HIMSELF THAT HE IS GOD.
“THAT DAY,” according to verse 1, is the day of Christ’s coming and our subsequent “gathering together unto Him,” or “Rapture!” And these verses make it very clear that “THAT DAY”… “SHALL NOT COME” until the antiChrist, or “son of perdition,” comes FIRST!!!

Notice also the clear warning here not to listen to men who might try to DECEIVE us into thinking that this can happen some other way!? Jesus said in Matthew 24:3-5 that in the End Time “MANY would come ‘IN HIS NAME,’ DECEIVING many;” SPECIFICALLY CONCERNING what would be “THE SIGN OF HIS COMING” and the “END OF THE WORLD!” Is this happening today? Are there “many” today teaching that Jesus will come FIRST and rapture us out, instead of the antiChrist coming FIRST, like this plainly says? Can this be taken any other way than to mean exactly what it is saying in plain black and white?

Many of today’s preachers and teachers are putting the Church to sleep with “comfortable teachings,” telling them that they will be Raptured out before all these coming troubles, instead of PREPARING God’s people to STAND STRONG through these coming perilous times. This is exactly what happened to the Churches in China right before Mao Tse Tung came through and began slaughtering them by the thousands! The Chinese Church leaders that survived begged Corrie Ten Boom to warn the American churches not to make this same mistake. Her warnings have gone largely unheeded! Corrie Ten Boom said:
“There are some among us teaching there will be no tribulation, that the Christians will be able to escape all this; these are the false teachers Jesus was warning us to expect in the latter days.”
Corrie said to start memorizing your Bible, as the antiChrist will try to stamp out the Bibles and destroy the Word of God, and the only Bible some of us may have in the days ahead is what we have memorized and “hidden away” in our hearts.  

Begin by memorizing key passages that the Holy Spirit makes “stand out” to you. Amos speaks of this coming event, and says that in the end time there will be a “famine” for “hearing the Word of the Lord;” and that people will travel all over the world searching for the Word of the Lord and shall not find it!? (Amos 8: 11 & 12) This is something we should all take quite seriously and begin doing in earnest. On with our chapter…
5) Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things? (Paul had, obviously, already told these folks before that the antiChrist must come FIRST, yet they had forgotten or overlooked this upon receiving this demonic letter telling them they had missed the rapture. So Paul is chiding them: “Don’t you remember I told you the antiChrist must come FIRST?” “You haven’t seen this happen yet, have you?” “Have you seen him sitting in the temple showing himself that he is God?” “How could you have believed this false report?”)
6) And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in His time. (And now you know what has to HAPPEN FIRST, before the Lord is revealed in His time…the antiChrist MUST COME FIRST!!!)

7) For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only He who now letteth will let, until He be taken out of the way.
Out of this entire chapter, verse 7 here is the only verse that is used in the Pre-Tribulational teaching! They blindly ignore the first six verses in this chapter which directly prove they are wrong; instead, they teach that verse 7 means that the Holy Spirit is taken from the earth and, therefore, we must go with it in the Rapture! That is “one heck of a lot” to read into this verse! This just says: “Until He be taken out of the way!?” It doesn’t say to “where!” That could happen right here on this earth!? This verse mentions nothing specific about a “catching up” or a Rapture; and it could simply mean that the Holy Spirit “steps aside” and lets evil come forth to fulfill it’s end time role.

To read all this into this one short verse, while blindly ignoring the first six verses before it which state things totally contrary to this view (in plain black and white) and which cannot be taken any other way than to mean just exactly what they are saying — is, in my opinion, VERY, VERY DANGEROUS! Yet this very view sums up the belief system of the vast majority of God’s Church today!

Some of these doctrines being taught in the modern American Church are rather like buying a car. If you don’t look “too closely,” or pay very close attention to detail, you will buy the first thing that comes along and think you got a good deal till it quickly falls apart! And the car dealers will polish it all up and make even a JUNK HEAP look good, as long as you don’t look too closely! If you go over these verses and read them quickly, not paying much attention to detail, you will easily be deceived by some of the modern teaching on them!

If you examine the Pre-Tribulational position on this subject closely, you will see that in order to believe this teaching, you would have to go back to verse 3 and change it to read: “That day SHALL come first before the man of sin sits in the temple showing himself that he is God,” instead of how it presently reads: “That day SHALL NOT come…” You would have to directly alter it so that it reads “EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE” OF WHAT IT PRESENTLY SAYS!

You would think that folks would see that by doing this they set themselves up as DECEIVERS according to the first part of this verse! This verse should SCARE these people! It should make them REALLY EXAMINE what they are teaching closely and carefully!?  

Folks, it is not a “light thing” to alter the Scriptures in this way! Yet that is exactly what many,  even MOST, are doing!? It really appears that these folks are unknowingly fulfilling Jesus prophecy in Matthew 24:3-5 by “deceiving” people concerning the “sign of His Coming” and “the end of the world.” That is exactly what they are doing by telling them it’s going to come some other way than what He plainly said in black and white!? The “signs of His Coming” are clearly laid out by Him, yetd these people are teaching us that we WILL NOT EVEN BE HERE to witness these very same “signs” He said to look for (see all of Matthew 24).

Some teach that perhaps the “Coming of the Lord” (spoken of here is the “Day of the Lord,” as it is referred to in other areas of Scripture) is a 7 YEAR PERIOD instead of something that just happens in an instant on one certain day — and that perhaps He comes and raptures us out at the BEGINNING of this period, and then the antiChrist comes and rules for seven years, after we are raptured out, and then Jesus returns once again at the end of this 7 year period!? (The “key” word in this belief is “perhaps!?”; that makes it a THEORY, yet it is taught and accepted as FACT!)  

But even if you take this view, according to verse 3, the antiChrist would STILL HAVE TO COME “FIRST” BEFORE THE “VERY FIRST DAY” OF THIS 7 YEAR PERIOD; or, once again, you would have to ALTER verse 3 to read “that day SHALL come… before the antiChrist sits in the temple showing himself that he is God,” rather than as it presently reads: “That day SHALL NOT COME...”

Does this seem like a “small thing” to be harping on to you? Not worth arguing about or even discussing? Well God turns the wheels of His great Omnipotence on just such “very small things!” Because of the loss of a “nail” in his hoof, a rider’s horse can lose a shoe, stumble, fall and kill the rider! This one small “oversight” by the Church may well cause this VERY THING to happen to it in the end!?

Why is it that people can never see the blindness and sin in their OWN GENERATION? Why can we look back to the past, and see the sins of others in the Bible down through time, but do not even suspect that, today, we are doing the same thing the Pharisees of old did? Why can we not see the “blindness” and “callousness” in our own hearts?



Many folks have gotten fed up over “arguing” over this subject, and they say that “they refuse to even discuss it anymore!” I have seen brethren almost come to blows and scream and yell at each other over this topic! The devil gets really angry when it is brought up because it is exposing one of his GREATEST DECEITS THAT HE IS FOISTING UPON GOD’S UNSUSPECTING CHURCH IN THE END TIME!

It is certainly wrong to get ANGRY over anything and get mad at each other, but it is not wrong to discuss such a serious and important matter as this! Satan just loves that feint! That “cop out!” He knows that then everyone will be afraid to bring up the subject for fear of starting a “hullabullo,” and so they just will not talk about it. And then folks go on teaching their perverted and distorted view to the flock of God’s Church! He is so clever! First of all, it is NOT a light thing, and it will have very dramatic negative effects on God’s Church when things do not transpire as folks have been taught they will!

Most folks teaching this “pre-trib” view are doing it in ignorance, just “parroting” what they have been taught since they got saved, without having ever taken the time to study it all out carefully and prayerfully. The Lord is very merciful and understanding and patient. He is trying to get folks to “see the light” on this, but it is very difficult. “As the branch bends, so grows the tree!” And once a person is grounded deeply in this false belief system, it seems to be very hard to convince them otherwise, or to even get them to LOOK AT THE FACTS surrounding all this and read Scriptures like the ones in this study.

Most will “stubbornly” cling to this false view, until it becomes apparent that it is wrong, and then they will say: “Oh WHY, didn’t we see this plain and simple truth laid out in the Scriptures?” “WHY couldn’t we see what Jesus warned SO CLEARLY of concerning all this?” Suddenly the “blinders” will be “ripped off” and they will clearly see, but it will be too late to alter the effects of what it will cause on “the Body!” Those who are “strong” in the Lord will survive but, sadly, it will not go so well for those who “follow afar off, for those who will begin to question their FAITH and the LORD, and for those who become very confused!” Many may just “give up.”

This is something that should be brought out into the open and discussed above almost all else, after Salvation and other basics of the Faith! People say that it is just “causing division.” The TRUTH always causes division among those who resent hearing it! Jesus’ Words caused division. Paul’s words caused division, and Paul ARGUED with the Pharisees and “contended” and “disputed” with them for three years in the Book of Acts before getting fed up with them and telling them he’d had it with them and was now going to the Gentiles! So it is not wrong to “contend” for the Truth!

When Satan has successfully deceived a group of people and you come along preaching the truth, THERE ARE GOING TO BE FIRE WORKS! THE DEVIL HATES BEING EXPOSED AND HIS WORK RUINED!
People get MAD! WE should not argue in anger, but discuss important topics like this with love and patience and prayer. This should not be swept under the rug! Let’s go on…
8) And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of His mouth, and SHALL DESTROY WITH THE BRIGHTNESS OF HIS COMING:

9) Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,
As you can see by verse 8, the antiChrist is DESTROYED by the “brightness” of this same “Coming of the Lord” in which He “gathers us together” unto Himself, according to verse 1. So if this is the case, then how can the antiChrist rule or reign for another 3 ½ or 7 years, as is taught by so many, today, in the Christian world?

Perhaps it’s time to prayerfully rethink all of these teachings and put aside devotion to a particular Church’s beliefs out of blind obedience alone, and start studying the Scriptures deeply and praying for God’s guidance, and preaching the truth! “He who has ears to hear, let him hear!?” 

If the Church doesn’t get straightened out on this, this one false teaching could wreak more havoc on God’s Church, more than any of the calamities that have befallen it before down through time! It may even help facilitate the “great falling away” from the Christian Faith spoken of here.

Many Christians will even support the antiChrist when he comes, thinking that he couldn’t possibly be the antiChrist or they would have been raptured out already!? He’s not coming with “horns and hoofs” and a “pitchfork!” He will appear as “AN ANGEL OF LIGHT!” He will appear to be a very righteous and Godly man, a great man of peace, who will be championing the cause of Israel in the world courts, demanding that they be given the right to rebuild their temple (which he plans to sit in and rule from), and that they should be given the right to re-start their animal sacrifices once again.

Folks will think he’s the greatest man of peace and friend of Israel to ever come along! He’s going to fool nearly EVERYONE! BUT DON’T YOU BE DECEIVED!

Read these Scriptures again and pray over them, asking the Lord if these things are really the truth!  

Satan is setting the entire church system up for the greatest “sucker punch” he’s ever given them he will knock out their faith out by total surprise and shock when things do not turn out the way folks have been taught!  

Satan has lulled almost the entire church to sleep. Wake up and see what’s coming! He just LOVES this method of catching folks off guard by total surprise and causing the greatest amount of fear possible in an instant! It causes such great confusion, and he is the “author of confusion.” He wants to totally KNOCK OUT THE CHURCH IN ONE PUNCH!!!

Like a great commanding general who studies out his war strategies long in advance, Satan sat back and looked over this “end time” scenario centuries ago. He knew he would have to put the Church to sleep to be able to catch them by surprise in this fashion. He began to enter the Church with false “sleepy” doctrines.

Some have traced this “pre-tribulational” teaching back to around 1830 when a young Scottish girl named Margaret MacDonald received a prophecy which began to lead others this way in their thinking. Immediately influenced were John Darby of the Plymouth Brethren and Edward Irving of the Church of the Irvingites. Then C.I. Scofield, author of the Scofield Bible, picked it up and brought it to America where it swept the religious world like wildfire; even Moody Bible Institute and Dallas Theological Seminary! Undoubtedly, this is a fulfilling of the prophecy that “the time will come when they will not endure SOUND DOCTRINE, but will heap to themselves teachers having “itching ears,” and their ears shall be turned from the truth to hearing “fables!?” (2 Timothy 4: 3 & 4)

Author and researcher Dave Macpherson went back and studied the sermons of these two men, Irving and Darby, and found that up until the time of Margaret’s prophecy, they both preached what the Church had believed for the first 1800 years — what we now call “Post-Tribulation” / “Pre-Wrath” rapture. Then suddenly they both began to preach this new “altered” view and to vie with each other over who was the first to come out with it. Now it has become such a part of standard Church dogma, that if you speak against it, people think you are a false prophet coming along speaking against the Lord and the Bible!

What people grow up hearing for many years, over and over, is what they usually believe very strongly in; and it forms a “stronghold” in their mind, which, in this case, is a strong hold of Satan, even though they don’t know it! When you come along preaching the truth on this, many folks think you are teaching some “new doctrine” which is against the “old teaching” that has been around since the beginning!? Most are totally unaware that the “post-trib” / “pre-wrath” view is what the Church believed FIRST for nearly 1800 years!!! This “pre-trib” teaching is the “JOHNNY-COME-LATELY,” a mere 170 - 200 years old!

Other researchers have traced this “pre-trib” teaching to a Jesuit priest named Father Immanuel Lacunza, who wrote similar things in 1790. Who ever came out with it, it is part of Satan’s long term strategy to get the Church right where he wants us so he can wreak the most havoc and cause the greatest amount of confusion and damage possible when his man, the “beast” or “antiChrist,” comes to power!? 

From what I’ve read of Church history, no one believed or taught any doctrine like this from the time of the Church Fathers, clear up to the time of the Reform-Era Fathers, like Luther! THEY ALL believed that we would go through the tribulation, just like Jesus said, and be “gathered together” unto Him at the end  although there are a “host” of Churchy, “pre-trib” teachers and “apologists” right now who are trying very hard to trace it clear back to the early Church!? I think they are “making it all up as the go along” because, from all I’ve studied, I’ve seen it NOWHERE! They are trying to fit a modern belief into a past where it never existed!

The “Reform Era Fathers,” like Luther, believed in “post-trib” rapture; they just had the “lengths of time” for end time events off. Because, before in the Book of Ezekiel, God had told the Prophet to lie on his side for “so many days” and that the nation of Israel would suffer for an equal time in “years” — these reform-era fathers all thought that the 3 ½ years of tribulation that were coming were also according to this same “day / year” principle.

Three and one-half years, or 1,260 days, were to be considered 1,260 YEARS that the church would be in “tribulation” under the wicked Pope’s of Rome!?— this is what they all thought — and that the Pope’s were the antiChrist!? But none of them believed that we would be raptured out before the tribulation. One would think that since the first 69 weeks of Daniel’s “70 weeks” prophecy of the end (Daniel 9: 24-27) were NOT according to the “day / year” principle — that, therefore, the “LAST” and “FINAL” week would NOT BE EITHER but would be actual days and years in real time, just as the first 69!? But sadly this was not the case — another of Satan’s tricks! They thought He meant a day for a year during this era in Church history.

One by one, all their theories on the year Jesus would return turned out to be wrong; the final one being the most dramatic, in the fall of 1844; where William Miller’s followers (the Adventists) all got up on their housetops dressed in white sheets awaiting the Lord’s return on a specific day Miller thought he got by calculating this time period from one Pope, whom Miller considered to be the most wicked!? Well it obviously came and went and the movement fell into disorder, and out of it came the 7th Day Adventists and the Church of God 7th Day.  

THEN the “pre-tribulational” view came on the scene in the mainstream Church world, and over the course of the next 100 or so years, swept the religious world like wild fire! Like I said, NOW everybody thinks it is the “old standard” believed by everyone since the very beginning, and they don’t realize that it is a relative “newcomer” in the Bible Eschatology or “End Time Bible Prophecy” field!

That was a tragic day for much of the church in 1844, when Miller was proved wrong, but not nearly as tragic as what’s coming when the lie of “pre-tribulational” rapture comes to “full fruit” and has it’s full effect on the Lord’s Church!!? As I said before, many may support the antiChrist, thinking he’s a good man, and not suspecting him at all because they have been taught they will be “raptured out” first before he comes!? Then many will have their faith destroyed when he takes off the “halo” and puts on the “horns!” The entire Church will be in disarray, and many who have been taught that the “good” Christians will be raptured out, and the “bad” ones “LEFT BEHIND,” may give up in total discouragement. There may be many suicides and many in great depression, disillusionment and discouragement! To think that you’ve “failed the Lord” and that “He’s LEFT YOU BEHIND TO SUFFER!?” So many people are going to be hurt by this unScriptural teaching!  

The Church will “rock and reel” under the fiery darts of the one who will “speak great words against the Most High,” and “wear out the Saints of the Most High” — who will “make war with the Saints and PREVAIL against them!?” And when the “guillotines begin to fall,” and people begin to lose their heads for refusing to deny their Faith in Jesus Christ, many may begin to “jump off the boat” like “scared men fleeing a sinking ship!”

Instead of a “pre-tribulation rapture,” many are going to be “yanked” out of their beds in the middle of the night, by complete surprise — by “jackbooted” storm troopers brandishing sub-machine guns and dressed in black S.W.A.T. gear — and hauled off to PRISON CAMPS, which have already been set up all over America, under a program called REX 84!, first designed by Lt. Colonel Oliver North, in the days of President Ronald Reagan. This was even exposed in Congress by Congressman Jack Brooks, who publicly challenged Oliver North about it and was told to “shut up” as it was a matter of national security!  

Although originally designed to “house” American gun-owners and patriots who refuse to go along with a “new world order” takeover — complete with a massive “gun confiscation program, as well as other “dissidents”— the REX 84 program in the hands of a future administration may be used to lock up even other “Christian dissidents” who, although “peaceful” and non-violent, do not “believe” the way they are supposed to (i.e.: folks who dare to expose America and Israel’s sins!).

If you wish to know more about this “REX 84 program,” contact Evangelist David J. Smith of the Church of God Evangelistic: P.O.Box 36, Waxahachie, Texas 75168. Or call 972-937-2227. He has “proof” of this event! Smith is a good man to listen to if you want to keep up on all that is going on behind the scenes, that we are not being told about in the standard media, and especially how it relates to Bible prophecy; although I don’t personally hold to his doctrinal Church teachings. He does teach “post-trib” rapture correctly though! If you live in Kansas, Texas, Oklahoma, Missouri, Arkansas, or Louisiana, you can listen to Smith nightly, Mon - Fri, from 10:30 till Midnight on 870 AM radio. It comes in great on most car radios! Tune in and find out things your church probably isn’t telling you! As I said, I do not adhere to all his beliefs in the Church of God 7th Day, but at least he’s telling it like it is on coming events  99 % of the other pastors across this land are putting people to sleep so that this all comes upon them UNAWARES!!!

In Matthew 24:9 & 10, Jesus spoke of this terrible “end time persecution” that would occur in every nation of the world against His followers, near the time of His return:
“9)Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted and shall KILL you: and ye shall be hated of ALL NATIONS for My Names sake.” 10) “And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another.”
Notice that this great “end time” persecution the Lord speaks of here comes BEFORE the RAPTURE of verses 29-31. GREAT PERSECUTION COMES FIRST!!!

Daniel the Prophet also spoke of this same event over and over: of a GREAT PERSECUTION of God’s Saints in the END TIME TRIBULATION PERIOD under the TERRIFYING REIGN OF THE ANTICHRIST:
Daniel 7: 21,22,25-27:
“21) I beheld, and the same horn MADE WAR WITH THE SAINTS, and PREVAILED AGAINST THEM: 22) until the Ancient of Days came, and judgement was given to the Saints of the Most High, and the time came that the Saints possessed the Kingdom.” 25) And he shall SPEAK GREAT WORDS AGAINST THE MOST HIGH, AND SHALL WEAR OUT THE SAINTS OF THE MOST HIGH, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a TIME and TIMES and the DIVIDING OF TIME. (3 1/2 years) 26) But the JUDGMENT shall sit, and they shall take away his dominion, to consume and to destroy it unto the end. 27) And the kingdom and dominion, and the greatness of the kingdom under the whole heaven, shall be given to the people of the Saints of the Most High, whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey Him.”
Daniel 8:23-25;
23) “And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, and king of fierce countenance and understanding dark sentences shall stand up. 24) and his power shall be mighty, but not by his own power: and he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practice, AND SHALL DESTROY THE MIGHTY AND THE HOLY PEOPLE. (Wake up America! YOU ARE the “MIGHTY AND THE HOLY PEOPLE!” The American Churches are going to feel the main brunt of this persecution, along with the tiny nation of Israel! It’s not just the Jews, folks, who are going to suffer during this time as many also falsely teach today!)
Jesus said in Matthew 24:15, to pay special attention to the “abomination of desolation” being placed in the temple and to FLEE at this time to places of refuge! Matthew 24:15 - 21:
“15) When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:) 16) then let them which be in Judea FLEE into the mountains: 17) Let him which is on the housetop not come down to take anything out of his house, 18) Neither let him which is in the field return back to take his clothes. 19) And woe to them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days! 20) But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day: 21) FOR THEN SHALL BE GREAT TRIBULATION SUCH AS WAS NOT SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THE WORLD TO THIS TIME, NO, NOR EVER SHALL BE.”
Again, there is no mention of a “rapture” before this time anywhere in Matthew 24. It comes LATER in verses 29-31. If you follow pre-tribulaional teaching, it truly must be a “secret rapture!?” It’s SO SECRET that it’s NOT EVEN MENTIONED IN THE SCRIPTURES!!! Ha! People should be “truly leary” of such a teaching! There should certainly be a lot more HARD EVIDENCE for it, if it were true! But there is not! All the HARD EVIDENCE falls on the side of “post-tribulational,” “pre-wrath rapture!”

Apparently, this placing of the “abomination of desolation” heralds the BEGINNING of the GREAT TRIBULATION PERIOD!? Let’s go to Daniel and read what happens at this time, as the Lord suggested above:
Daniel 11: 31-36:
“31) And arms shall stand on his part, and they shall pollute the sanctuary of strength, and shall take away the daily sacrifice, AND THEY SHALL PLACE THE ABOMINATION THAT MAKETH DESOLATE. 32) And such as do wickedly against the covenant shall he corrupt by flatteries: BUT THE PEOPLE THAT DO KNOW THEIR GOD SHALL BE STRONG, AND DO EXPLOITS. 33) And they that understand among the people shall INSTRUCT MANY: YET THEY FALL BY THE SWORD, AND BY FLAME, BY CAPTIVITY, AND BY SPOIL MANY DAYS. 34) Now when they shall fall, they shall be helped with a little help: but many shall cleave to them with flatteries. 35) AND SOME OF THEM OF UNDERSTANDING SHALL FALL, TO TRY THEM, AND TO PURGE, AND TO MAKE THEM WHITE, EVEN TO THE TIME OF THE END: because it is yet for a time appointed. 36) And the king shall do according to his will; and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above EVERY GOD, AND SHALL SPEAK MARVELOUS THINGS AGAINST THE GOD OF GODS, and shall PROSPER till the indignation be accomplished: for that that is determined shall be done.
The “indignation” spoken of here is “God’s indignation” against the nation of Israel for “trying to take their kingdom back in the flesh” without going through the proper “doorway” of JESUS CHRIST, His Son (as per John 10); and winning the world through His love, instead of considering themselves better than everyone else (God is no respecter of persons); and mowing them down with machine guns, bombs and bullets to take back what they consider “rightfully theirs” — but is NOT since the Lord drove them out 2,000 years ago. And also because they are willing to accept “one who comes in his own name” to get this great advantage and blessing, instead of having accepted Him who came “in the name of His Father,” Jesus Christ! This “indignation of God” is also against the duped American church system for “aiding and abbetting” them in this great end time “fiasco!”

Both the American church system and the modern nation of so-called “Israel” are going to be PURGED AND PURIFIED AND MADE WHITE HERE to get them straightened out on this issue! When they finally realize all this — under the antiChrist’s relentless attacks and his actual “winning” against them and subduing and destroying them — AND THEY REPENT (as per Zechariah 13), then the “Lord will come and fight against those nations that have come against them, and He will return in all His glory to fight for His people and deliver them from their STRONG OPPRESSOR!” (as per Zechariah 14).

This is another “great lie” that has entered the “corrupt and compromised American church system” that the Lord is going to expose before all, before the great day of His Coming! Jesus said in John chapters 8 & 10, to the Pharisees, that they were not going to be saved and blessed by God merely because they were “flesh sons of Abraham,” and that they had to go through “HIM, the ‘DOOR’, to get into the kingdom!?” Now, 2,000 years later, the same bunch with the same mindset have returned to foist this same belief on the followers of Christ; and most have warmly received it with open arms, no questions asked, and would support them to the death, fighting to get their land back for themthinking that they are “doing God service!” But don’t worry! God is going to “straighten everyone out on this” before the Lord returns! It will be made very plain!

As both America and Israel “rock and reel” under the antiChrist’s future attacks and coming terrorist attacks — and natural disasters like famines, earthquakes, weather related disasters, disease, and ill health — many will TURN HARD to the Lord and begin questioning, “Why is all this coming upon us?” And the Lord will begin to show them the reasons for these things. But many of the new, coming, end time Prophets, who will show people this and will expose these things, will be killed in great anger (just like Jesus, His followers, and all the Prophets of old) by these same people or, possibly, even by infuriated “fundamentalist-evangelicals” with their .30-30’s in the back of their pick-up windows, “thinking that they are doing God service!?” (John 16:1 & 2).

The majority of American Churches have become SPIRITUALLY BLIND and DECEIVED on almost EVERYTHING THAT THEY BELIEVE!!! The only thing most have right is the foundation of receiving the Lord Jesus Christ as their Savior! From there on it goes downhill quite rapidly, and even most of them are confused on that, and get folks SAVED going in one door, and then UNSAVED going out the other! Folks leave totally confused about their salvation and deluded on most every other teaching!

From “RICHES AND PROSPERITY” to “PRE-TRIBULATIONAL RAPTURE,” and “FALSE HOLINESS” or more properly, “SELF RIGHTEOUSNESS” (the sin of the Pharisees), they compass “land and sea” to make “one convert;” and when they have found him, they make him two-fold more the “child of hell,” as Jesus said, than they are themselves!?  

Most Churches are turning their people into “MODERN PHARISEES” instead of loving followers of Christ, like the early disciples were. Concerning the totally serious and sometimes “horrifying” end time events that are coming, they build on false foundation these modern “comfortable” teachings that put them TOTALLY TO SLEEP  and make them into “self-righteous judges” of today’s “wicked sinners,” and “publicans and harlots,” who condemn folks to hell with their tongues, instead of loving them into the kingdom. God bless you if your Church is NOT doing this and is trying to do it right the way Jesus intended. This message is not to all here, but to the “blind majority!” There are a few that are really trying to do it right and follow the Lord!

Most Churches are being taught that they are the “Church of Philadelphia” spoken of in the Book of Revelation; and that they are going to be “kept from that hour” (the great tribulation) by being “raptured out beforehand!” But if you will read on in your Bible to the very next church in that chapter, you will find a little more accurate description of today's modern Church system as a whole; the “Church of Laodicea!”
Revelation 3:14-20:
“14) And unto the Angel of the Church of the Laodiceians write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God; 15) I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot. 16) So then because thou art lukewarm, I will spew thee out of my mouth. 17) Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing: (The modern “riches and prosperity doctrine of many?”) and knowest not that thou are wretched, and miserable, and poor, and BLIND, and naked:

(SPIRITUAL BLINDNESS!!! When you try to show folks about pre-trib rapture, or riches and prosperity, or any of these other false teachings, they just cannot seem to “see” it, no matter how hard or long you try to patiently explain it and show Scriptures!? They read over and over them and just cannot seem to see what they are saying, they have been so programmed! It’s quite discouraging, but that is exactly what this verse is addressing here!)

18) I counsel thee to BUY OF ME GOLD TRIED IN THE FIRE, THAT THOU MAYEST BE RICH; and white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakedness do not appear; (In one place in the Gospels, Jesus said that you get “RICHES IN HEAVEN” when you give of the money and blessings you have on this earth! You get RICHES THERE, by GIVING HERE! Of your time, your love, your material blessings, and your ALL!)
(Instead of the Gospel being perverted to mean that it’s “okay” to seek to be rich and have lots of money, prestige, and power — as the modern, mainly “Dallas based” televangelists teach — we are NOT to seek these things, but to give our lives as a “living sacrifice” and to give our all for Jesus in every way we can. We are to seek to GIVE OF OURSELVES, NOT TO GET!!! …and to anoint thine eyes with eye salve, that thou mayest see... Once again, to pray hard against the SPIRITUAL BLINDNESS of the teachings of the vast majority of today’s modern Churches and their inability to see messages such as this one, which is preaching the “unpopular truth!”)

19) As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent.
Getting back to the subject of the rapture, one thing that might be causing confusion over this issue is this: the “pre-trib” view confuses two separate time periods in the Book of Revelation, the TRIBULATION and the WRATH, as being one and the same! They are not the same event. 

1 Thessalonians 5:9 says that, “we are not appointed to God’s wrath, but to obtain salvation;” therefore, “pre-tribbers” assume that we are not HERE on this earth for almost the ENTIRE BOOK OF REVELATION!? Folks! That is a lot of paper for God to “waste!?” There are a lot of very intricately detailed prophecies in there to just be discarded if the main body of the Church isn’t even going to be around for them!?

In the Book of Revelation, the TRIBULATION PERIOD is heralded by the BLOWING OF 7 TRUMPETS and, as shown before here, we are raptured out at the LAST ONE (Revelation chapters 8-11). This is then FOLLOWED by the WRATH PERIOD, which is heralded by the POURING OUT OF 7 VIALS, AFTER we are gone! (Revelation chapter 16). Therefore, we are NOT HERE for that event, but in heaven with the Lord at the Marriage Supper of the Lamb, so we “are not appointed unto wrath.” Most churches are taught that “the wrath” covers the ENTIRE BOOK OF REVELATION!? As you can see if you will look up Revelation and read this, this simply is NOT TRUE!

The TRIBULATION is the time period in which the antiChrist tries to stamp out all other religions, and mainly Christianity, and to foist upon the world the worship of himself as God. The WRATH is the time period which DIRECTLY FOLLOWS THE TRIBULATION, in which the Lord returns to rescue His people from the antiChrist’s wicked and cruel clutches in the rapture, and then pours out His WRATH on him and his followers AFTER we are gone!

During the tribulation, one-third of everything is destroyed by the Lord’s “selective judgments,” while we are protected miraculously by the Lord right here on the earth (1/3rd of the sky is darkened, 1/3rd of the oceans turn blood red, etc.). This is a bit like how the U.S. uses “smart bombs” so as not to hit the innocent civilians in warfare. (I’m sure the Lord’s a lot more accurate though!) An example of the Lord doing this in the Old Testament is found during the plagues in Egypt of old: the judgments of the Lord fell only on the Egyptians and not on the Hebrews who lived right next door to them. During the wrath period, EVERYTHING is judged by the Lord. (i.e.: the WHOLE sky darkened, ALL the oceans turn blood red, etc…) (Read Revelation chapters 8-11 and 16 to see this.)

It is my earnest prayer that Christians will begin to wake up and see all these things that are coming and to prepare accordingly. This study is not written to make people mad or to cause division. Please don’t take anything that is said here in that way. PLEASE pray hard about this message, and ask the Lord if it’s the truth. Ask Him to remove any “spiritual blindness” from former teachings that might be hindering (and not allowing you to see these things, if you are having trouble understanding them)! PLEASE don’t let these things come upon you unawares!

Please begin an active Bible Memory Program and begin to prayerfully study the Bible as never before. Pray and learn to hear the “voice of the Lord” in your heart (Jeremiah 29:13, 33:3, John 16:13,14). These are three things that we will all need to be accomplished in to go through what lies ahead victoriously! We are indeed going to enter shortly into “times that will try men’s souls!” Let’s prepare now by getting as close to Jesus as we can, and by preparing in every way we can as we are led by His Spirit. 

Thank you for your time.



Related:

July 29, 2011

The Catholic Church’s Secret Gay Cabal

He said, "Religion is not necessarily bad. A lot of people seem to need religion, with its mysteries and rituals — so they will have religion. But the major religions of today have to be changed because they are not compatible with the changes to come. The old religions will have to go, especially Christianity. Once the Roman Catholic Church is brought down, the rest of Christianity will follow easily. Then a new religion can be accepted for use all over the world. It will incorporate something from all of the old ones to make it more easy for people to accept and feel at home. Most people won't be too concerned with religion. They will realise that they don't need it." The Bible will be changed. It will be rewritten to fit the new religion. Gradually, key words will be replaced with new words having various shades of meaning. Then the meaning attached to the new word can be close to the old word — and as time goes on, other shades of meaning of that word can be emphasised, and then gradually that word replaced with another word. I don't know if I'm making that clear, but the idea is that everything in Scripture need not be rewritten, just key words replaced by other words. The variability in meaning attached to any word can be used as a tool to change the entire meaning of Scripture and, therefore, make it acceptable to this new religion. Most people won't know the difference; and this was another one of the times where he said, "The few who do notice the difference won't be enough to matter." - Dr. Lawrence Dunegan, The New Order of the Barbarians: Changing the Bible Through Revisions of Key Words (the Churches Will Help Us), March 1988

The Irish report finished me. Because it wasn't just about sexual abuse; it was about the physical and emotional abuse people with power in the Church thought they could get away with. And if you think about it, there's no way it will ever end. The structure of the religion, where the priestly class gets to talk directly to God and therefore always has some power over you, is the source of all corruption. In many cases, the corruption played out in sexual terms, in other cases in monetary terms, and in yet others both. Of course, there are good clergy -- many people do manage to resist the temptation to skim the funds, diddle the kids, etc. But many fewer manage to avoid lording it over the people in the pews -- always trying to preserve the satrapy. You can't hand people power over another human's very soul and then expect them not to abuse it. The religion is based on a flawed principal, and as a result I can't go back, and I won't support them with my dollars, even though I know some of that gift is going to causes I support. -
Wannabeer@theballgirl

The Catholic Church’s Secret Gay Cabal

By Brandon K. Thorp, Gawker.com
July 28, 2011

John C. Favalora is a sallow old man who looks like the corpse of Dom DeLuise. He likes attractive young men to sit on his lap and allegedly treats them to trips in the Florida Keys. He was, until recently, part owner of a company that makes "all natural" boner-inducing beverages. He's also the Archbishop Emeritus of Miami.

Favalora, who was the most powerful Catholic official in Southern Florida from 1994 until last year, stands accused of cultivating what one group of pissed-off Catholics describes as a corrupt "homosexual superculture" in the 195 churches, schools, missions, seminaries, and universities that constitute the Miami Archdiocese.

If their allegations are to be believed, for sixteen years Favalora ran his organization like the don of a lavender mob, rewarding his favorite homosexual sons and forgiving their many indiscretions—rampant sex, hedonism, embezzlement, alcoholism, and the railroading of chaste priests among them—while punishing those with the temerity to complain. Wanton hedonistic gay sex is of course unobjectionable—even encouraged!—among those not in thrall to the idea that God hates your penis. But for the 500-or-so priests and deacons charged by The Holy Father Pope Benedict XVI with ensuring the spiritual integrity of 1.3 million of God's children in Southern Florida, it's…unorthodox.

The Catholic Church's Secret Gay Cabal
John Favalora, the Archbishop Emeritus of Miami. (Photo via AP)

Favalora's accusers are loosely organized under the name "Christifidelis," and in 2005 they undertook an extensive investigation of priestly misbehavior in the Archdiocese. They now believe their findings resulted in Archbishop Favalora's sacking last year, and his replacement by a manly, conservative workaholic named Thomas Wenski. The leader of Christifidelis, an attorney named Sharon Bourassa, declined to comment for this story. But it hardly matters.

Christifidelis's exertions on behalf of Mother Church are recorded in an enormous, binder-bound document entitled "Miami Vice: A Preliminary Report on the Financial, Spiritual, and Sexual Improprieties of the Clergy of the Miami Archdiocese." Today, for the first time, Gawker is releasing portions of it to the public.

A Kind of Gay Hogwarts With Palm Trees

Here are just some of the un-Catholic behaviors that "Miami Vice" accuses Favalora of engaging in: He partially owned a company that manufactured Yohimbe, an aphrodisiac beverage marketed to horny club-kids with the promise of "the hands-down best sex of your life." He allegedly took frequent trips to fabulous Key West with his gay associates. He was over-familiar toward his seminarians. (One ex-employee of the diocese recalls him telling a young seminarian at a gathering to "Come to papa and sit on my lap.") Favalora's second- and third-in-command, Monsignor William Hennessey and Monsignor Michael Souckar, are both accused by Christefidelis of being active homosexuals—and if they are, that counts among the least of their difficulties with Catholic orthodoxy.

In fact, the Archdiocese was a hotbed of sodomy long before Favalora set foot in Florida. Two unrelated sources, both priests, speak of a flamboyantly gay bishop in Arecibo, Puerto Rico, named Miguel Rodriguez Rodriguez, who was known to his pupils as "Lili." These sources claim that during the 1970s and 80's, Lili treated Arecibo like his own personal harem, urging cute young men into the priesthood and plying them with gifts and money in exchange for sexual favors. Rome allegedly interceded in 1990 and banished Lili to a secluded monastery, where he remained until his death 20 years later. Several of Lili's erstwhile pupils landed in Miami in the 80's and 90's. Naturally, they were disinclined to take their celibacy oaths too seriously.

Priests speak, too, about the culture of "sex-driven favoritism" at St. John Vianney College Seminary—a kind of gay Hogwarts with palm trees, located out in the flat suburban wastes of southwest Dade County. Seminaries are traditionally gay places—Papist wits refer to Notre Dame seminary as "Notre Flame," Theological College as "Theological Closet," Mundelein as "Pink Palace," and so on. But St. John Vianney was special. One seminarian who dropped out in disgust in the 1980s recalls a miserable year being bullied by gay faculty, and the rector, Robert Lynch, fawning over his favorite seminarian: an attractive upper-classman named Steven O'Hala. The dropout also recalls Lynch installing a camera in the seminary's weight room to capture images of pumped, sweaty seminarians. (He is now a minister in a liberal Christian denomination, and says he has no beef with gay people.)

"He grabbed my crotch. Then he apologized, and we became friends."

A similar story is told by Peter P. Fuchs, an ex-seminarian who was at St. John Vianney during the last two years of Lynch's tenure.

"Steve O'Hala was definitely his boy. He was very buff—[Lynch] used to take pictures of him in the weight room." Asked whether Lynch actually installed a camera there, Fuchs laughs. "No. I think that would have been a little overt."

Robert Lynch departed St. John Vianney in the mid-80's. Twenty years later, as the bishop of the St. Petersburg diocese on Florida's west coast, he was accused of sexually harassing Bill Urbanski, the diocese's spokesman and the father of Lynch's godson. Funnily enough, one of Urbanski's more mild complaints was that Lynch liked to photograph him with his shirt off. The diocese settled out of court for $100,000.

Lynch's replacement at St. John Vianney was a priest named Bernard Kirlin, whom a former pupil describes as an openly gay alcoholic. In 1983, Kirlin began an intense relationship with Peter P. Fuchs, then a young seminarian.

"I probably entered [the seminary] partially because I was attracted to the idea of being in a gay environment," says Fuchs, an erudite gay man who now lives with his husband in Washington, D.C. "But I was also very interested in theology, in the big questions."

Fuchs was in his third year at St. John Vianney when Kirlin arrived. He was "urbane" and "brilliant," Fuchs says.

"Of course his attention flattered me."
Kirlin gravitated to Fuchs immediately, and invited him to dinner a few weeks into the academic year along with a few other seminarians.
"I think he probably just invited the boys he thought were hot," says Fuchs.

 The two men hit it off, and afterward Kirlin invited Fuchs back to the faculty building, where the pair sat and talked in the lounge. "He came on to me," Fuchs says. "Very, very sloppily. He grabbed my crotch. Then he apologized, and we became friends."

A Sick Culture

Kirlin and Fuchs were together "all the time" that year, relaxing, talking, and especially eating.

"We ate out almost every night," says Fuchs. "Nice restaurants. Remember Charade, in Coral Gables? That was a really, really expensive restaurant."
Eventually it occurred to Fuchs to ask where the money for these excursions came from.
"[Kirlin] told me, 'I work really hard, and they hardly pay me anything. So I take money out of the slush fund.'"

Fuchs says he loved Bernie Kirlin for his mind. He was "a profound mind, a deep mind, and incredibly fun and funny." Bernie Kirlin seems to have loved Fuchs in a very different way, with the kind of keening, desperate, altogether embarrassing love that stunted sexual beings occasionally develop for objects of unrequited romantic feeling. During the pair's trip to Rome, Fuchs says Bernie Kirlin would drunkenly enter his room in the small hours of the morning, wake him, and profess his undying devotion.

"It was obnoxious. We fought a lot on that trip," says Fuchs. "I can't even remember what about. But the relationship was, at that time, becoming a little cloying."

In an effort to save it, Fuchs says he decided to sleep with Kirlin, just once.

"I can't believe I was so stupid," he says. "I guess I thought, you know, if I give him what he wants this one time, maybe he'll be satisfied. What did I know? I was nineteen."
It didn't work. Fuchs says that in the weeks after their one night stand, Kirlin's ardor intensified.

After graduating from St. John Vianney, Fuchs was slated to continue his studies at St. Vincent de Paul in Boynton Beach, Fla. But this was too close to Miami, says Fuchs; an Archdiocesan official who had grown alarmed by Kirlin's unhealthy fixation on Fuchs intervened. Fuchs was sent instead to Washington, D.C., where he met his future husband the following year. "

And I got out," he says. "I'm immensely glad. It's a sick culture. The worst of religion and the worst of malformed human sexuality, jammed together in one place. The people who make it through to the priesthood have had to sublimate so much of themselves, have ignored so much. And then they're supposed to minister to people? Please."

Kirlin continued ministering to people, even after he was fired from the seminary.

"I'll never forget it," says a former pupil. "They found [Kirlin] wasted in the bed of a seminarian. They dragged him out by his feet and his hands—dragged him all the way to the priest's quarters. He was removed over that Christmas break."
Kirlin went to rehab. After stints in the Florida Keys and a Haitian neighborhood in Miami, Favalora rewarded him a beautiful parish in Coral Gables; a lush, moneyed municipality two miles south of downtown Miami.

Father Morales' Live-in Boyfriend

Christifidelis formed in 2005 after the sacking of Father Andrew Dowgiert from All Saints Church, in Sunrise, FL, where Dowgiert served as an associate pastor. Officially, he was sacked because of his bad attitude and fondness for alcohol. Not so, says Christifidelis.

Dowgiert was a Polish priest who spent much of the 90's ministering in Zimbabwe, where he contracted malaria. He was assigned to the Archdiocese of Miami in 1999, and became an associate pastor at St. Justin Martyr, in Key Largo, under Father Edward Olszewski. Shortly after Dowgiert's arrival, Olszewski was charged with having raped a boy decades earlier in Michigan. (Olszewski was convicted, and sentenced to four years' probation.) With Olszewski indisposed, Dowgiert took leadership of St. Justin Martyr for three years until a permanent pastor was installed. Dowgiert then moved to Good Shepherd parish in Miami, where he served as associate pastor under Father Michael Greer. Later, in a lawsuit Dowgiert filed against the Archdiocese, he alleged that Greer tried to seduce him.

Dowgiert served at Good Shepherd for a year. When Favalora announced that Dowgiert was to move again, Good Shepherd's parishioners petitioned the Archdiocese to reconsider. According to the lawsuit, "the parishioners complained to Monsignor Michael Souckar … that Father Greer was not available to them and that Father [Dowgiert] was a stable priest." The transfer proceeded anyway, and Dowgiert was assigned to serve under Father Anibal Morales at All Saints' Church.

Perhaps you can imagine Dowgiert's state of mind as he undertook his new assignment. He had, in the last decade, witnessed soul-crushing poverty in Zimbabwean villages, contended with a life-threatening illness, and been repeatedly forced to consider the implications of the Mother Church's inability to pair him with a celibate priest, or even a non-celibate priest who got his rocks off in ways that didn't involve coercive sodomy. And there he was, walking into Morales's All Saints rectory, and already he'd heard the rumors.

"Morales has a light touch with the parish funds," and "Morales has a boyfriend."

The Catholic Church's Secret Gay Cabal
Father Anibal Morales (Right, photo via Archdiocese of Miami)

Morales may or may not have had a light touch with parish funds—if he did, he's hardly unusual—but he was almost certainly a homosexual. Morales first attended seminary in Puerto Rico, where, incidentally, he is alleged to have been the pupil of the aforementioned Bishop Miguel "Lili" Rodriguez Rodriguez. Despite his august patronage, he was allegedly expelled for "sexual misconduct" with fellow students. He re-enrolled at St. John Vianney Seminary College in Miami, and was ejected from there, too. According to Dowgiert's lawsuit, Favalora interceded on Morales's behalf, and placed him under the tutelage of Father Gary Wiseman. (Allegedly, Wiseman himself was subsequently exiled to Mandeville, Jamaica, after accusations of sexual misconduct.) Morales received holy orders shortly thereafter.

Between his ordination and star-crossed meeting with Dowgiert, Morales scooted from church to church, pissing off parishioners wherever he went. According to Dowgiert's lawsuit, Morales's tenure at St. Francis de Sales was marked by rumors of missing parish funds. At St. John, Morales earned his parishioners' wrath by parading his boyfriend in front of a youth group. (This resulted in a formal letter of complaint to the Archdiocese.) By the time Dowgiert arrived at All Saints, Morales's reputation was tanking there, too.

Ejection from the Rectory

Upon Dowgiert's arrival, Morales departed for a six-week vacation with his alleged live-in boyfriend, Carlos Insignares, leaving the parish in Dowgiert's care. Dowgiert was soon approached by a deacon who expressed concern about Morales's handling of church money. As Dowgiert was responsible for signing church checks during Morales's absence, he began carefully questioning Morales's secretary about the checks' purposes. According to the lawsuit, the secretary was greatly discomfited, and interrupted Morales's vacation to tell him about Dowgiert's snooping. And so Dowgiert and Morales's relationship was strained before it had rightly begun.

The Catholic Church's Secret Gay Cabal
Among the records assembled in "Miami Vice" is this mortgage document showing that Father Anibal Morales co-owns a condo with his alleged boyfriend, Carlos Insignares.

Not long after, Dowgiert claims he received a visit from Monsignor William Hennessey, Archbishop Favalora's hatchet man, who asked that Dowgiert cease spending his off-days in the church rectory. This was an unusual request, as Dowgiert lived in the rectory. Dowgiert protested; he had nowhere else to go. Hennessey told him to get a hotel room. According to the lawsuit, "[Dowgiert] understood this to mean that Morales wanted to be alone with his homosexual lover."

Dowgiert's relationship with Morales suffered after his ejection from the rectory, and allegedly ceased to exist after Morales's boyfriend came to the church to conduct a "training exercise" and insulted Dowgiert in front of other parish employees. In 2004, Morales sent a letter to Favalora accusing Dowgiert of alcoholism, cruelty, and crudity; his letter was substantiated by several accompanying notes from parish staff, all of whom reported Dowgiert's strange words from his first week at All Saints as evidence of his bitter, un-Catholic outlook:

"Don't remind me of my ordination."
Hennessey summoned Dowgiert to discuss the charges, and informed Dowgiert he was to be sent away for treatment. According to the lawsuit, Dowgiert asked to speak to a lawyer, at which point Hennessey verbally terminated Dowgiert's employment.

The Catholic Church's Secret Gay Cabal
Hennessey (inset) and Favalora. (Photos via Getty, Miami Archdiocese)

Andrew Dowgiert was, most claim, a good priest; a priest who had never been in trouble, who saved St. Justin Martyr when its pastor was nabbed for boy-rape. A great many of All Saints most devout senior parishioners liked and admired him. They wondered: Why was the Archdiocese defending a non-celibate homosexual with a history of unpriestly behavior, and casting aside a devout, heroic priest who'd single-handedly rescued one of its parishes?

First they wondered privately. Then they wondered aloud. When a lay minister at All Saints named Gloria Luca was fired for wondering too loudly, they sought answers. Christifidelis was born.

Miami Vice

Sharon Bourassa, Christifidelis' founder, is an attorney who works entirely pro-bono, providing lawyerly aid to the poor. She represented Dowgiert in his lawsuit. The suit was unsuccessful (the judge decided the Catholic church has the right to be as skeazy as it wants), but yielded interesting things.

During a pre-trial investigation, for example, it emerged that Anibal Morales and his alleged boyfriend, Carlos Insignares, bought a house together on SW 13th Street, in Miami, where they cohabitated on Morales's days off; that Morales had granted Insignares power of attorney; that Insignares made extensive use of a gay hookup site called Bear411; and that Insignares was (and presumably still is) uncircumsized.

This photodocumentary evidence, along with filings from Dowgiert's lawsuit, make up a large portion of the document called "Miami Vice," the introduction to which reads, in part:

In accordance with the rights and duties guaranteed them by the Catholic tradition, the faithful of the Archdiocese of Miami wish to make known to their pastors at Rome the spiritual condition which they find themselves in in the aforementioned Archdiocese. To the point, it has come to their attention that there exists among the clergy of the Archdiocese a 'gay' superculture which fosters active homosexual activity, the misspending and misdirecting of parish funds, and the persecution of those (clergy and laity) who question this type of activity...

What follows are hundreds of pages of documentation divided into nine chapters and four appendices, consisting mostly of anonymous testimony accusing various diocesan priests of wanton promiscuity and financial misdeeds over the course of Favalora's reign. These testimonies were compiled with the help of concerned Floridian Catholics, priests and laity alike, with a great deal to lose if their involvement with Christifidelis became public. Which is why the accusations are generally accompanied by statements like this one:

"The primary source for this information is the above-mentioned priest-brother, whose name and contact information will be made available upon request."

That is, "upon request" from a Catholic official of the appropriate rank. The intended audience for "Miami Vice" was never the press. It was the Vatican.

"We're defending the Church," says Eric Giunta, an ex-seminarian and contributor to "Miami Vice." "It's essential to remember—the last thing we wanted was to hurt her."

Christifidelis was initially hopeful. In 2006, Bourassa received a visit from a Vatican official she cannot name. (She told Giunta the visitor was a Cardinal, but that's all.) The visitor listened sympathetically, and promised to investigate. Bourassa heard no more. Giunta says he convinced Bourassa to unleash "Miami Vice" upon the press at the end of 2008, when, at the far extremity of pious desperation, he decided only a public scandal might spur the Church to action. Neither Giunta nor Bourassa had any way of knowing that even as they hounded reporters, Favalora was packing his bags. When Favalora announced his retirement, they realized their mistake. After February, 2010, the world's journalists would hear no more from Christifidelis. They weren't about to make Wenski's life any harder by siccing some gutter-brained reporter on the Archdiocese at the most fragile stage of its recovery. Which is why, of all the members of Christifidelis, only Eric Giunta is now willing to go on record, and only reluctantly.

The Catholic Church's Secret Gay Cabal
Thomas Wenski, Miami's current Archbishop. (Photo via AP)

Why? "Because Wenski's not moving fast enough," he says. "He's walking a fine line." Giunta suggests that Wenski, though "a very good Bishop" who probably "wants to do the right thing," is hemmed in by political considerations.

"If you walk into the Archdiocese and fire everybody," he says, "there's going to be a scandal." Giunta is willing to talk, he says, because scandal might "allow [Wenski] more freedom to act."

Though it's easy to imagine Giunta wants the Archdiocese to squirm for more personal reasons, too.

"They're still there."

The bulk of Eric Giunta's contribution to "Miami Vice" takes the form of a letter addressed to "His Eminence Zenon Cardinal Grocholewski, Prefect, Congregation for Catholic Education and Seminaries" in Vatican City. When he wrote it, Giunta was a 22-year-old at a tragic impasse.

He had embraced conservative Catholicism in his teens, and in 2004 felt a calling to the priesthood. Giunta applied to Saint John Vianney at the beginning of 2005. In March, he began the standard battery of interviews to which prospective seminarians are subjected.

Giunta should have aced the interviews. At the time, he attended mass up to three times a week. His bedtime reading consisted of Thomas Aquinas, Thomas More, the aging then-Cardinal Ratzinger, and Augustine. You'd think such enthusiasms would excite the headhunters of a religion facing a demographic crisis, but no. One of his interviewers, Father Juan Sosa, spent his interview chatting to Giunta about Broadway musicals and the Oscar-night parties in his rectory. Another interviewer, Father Thomas O'Dwyer, wanted to talk about sodomy.

He asked Giunta if he would feel comfortable sharing a bedroom with a homosexual seminarian. Giunta allowed that he might not feel comfortable, but that he would cope. "[O'Dwyer] pressed this issue," says Giunta, "and I remember my exact words:

'In this as in all things, I submit to the prudential judgment of my superiors, insofar as they act in accord with the law and teaching of the Church.'"
Asked how he'd feel sharing a rectory with a gay pastor, Giunta says he repeated that answer verbatim.
"I told him the truth. I said: 'Father, I've known people who attended St. John Vienney, and I've heard rumors that until very recently there were certain behaviors there that might not be conducive to the living out of the evangelical counsels.'

Father O'Dwyer said: 'They're still there.'"

He told O'Dwyer that he wasn't worried. The new Pope would soon initiate an "apostolic visitation" (that's when the Vatican sends out a heavy to make sure the global Church is behaving), and Giunta was confident any egregious lapses of orthodoxy would be addressed.

"And then [O'Dwyer] chuckled," says Giunta, "and said something like, 'Don't get your hopes up.'

And then he said: 'Eric my boy, if the Holy Father were to get rid of every gay priest, this Archdiocese could run—' and then he paused, and said, 'ten parishes.'"
There are 118 parishes in the Archdiocese of Miami.

Eric Giunta never made it to to the rest of his interviews. In April, Giunta was rejected via email. A follow-up letter explained he'd been disqualified by a faulty "understanding of priestly ministry and Church life in general."

In his letter, Giunta wrote:

I do not know with absolute certainty that my rejection by the Miami Archdiocese was motivated by malice. Out of charity, I am giving all parties the benefit of the doubt. However, given what was revealed to me during the process about the prevalence of homosexuality in the Archdiocese of Miami …. along with the ambiguous reasons for my rejection, I thought I'd make my experience known to you and to those others in the hierarchy under whose jurisdiction these ecclesiastical institutions fall.

Not long after his rejection from St. John Vianney, a mutual acquaintance introduced Eric Giunta to Sharon Bourassa.

The Archdiocese, In Brief

When told about Giunta's interview with O'Dwyer, most of the sources consulted for this story were skeptical, suspecting either hyperbole on O'Dwyer's part or total fabrication on Giunta's.

"I have a hard time believing O'Dwyer would say something like that," says Peter Fuchs, who was at St. John Vianney with O'Dwyer. "These things aren't discussed in the open. In a formal interview? For someone to say that? No way."

But Fuchs and almost everyone else agrees that the information allegedly revealed by O'Dwyer is basically sound.

"You certainly couldn't run the Archdiocese without gay clergy," says a former diocesan priest. "Not the Archdiocese of Miami or any other one."

How gay is the Archdiocese of Miami? And, in particular, how gay was it under Archbishop Favalora? "Miami Vice" goes into great detail on the subject. It would probably be wrong to name names without Sharon Bourassa's sources around to offer corroboration, but even an overview shorn of identifying information paints a vivid picture.

As of 2005:

  • A priest who's been previously mentioned in this story was known to plan regular "sleepovers" with seminarians at his rectory in southwest Miami, and owned a "luxury" property.
  • A homosexual priest in Coral Gables owned "luxury" property and regularly used illicit drugs.
  • A homosexual priest who served as principal at one of the Archdiocese's high schools poached sexual partners from among the seminarians at St. John Vianney.
  • A homosexual priest in far, far south Miami kept attractive young men living in his rectory.
  • A homosexual priest in the town of Miramar was co-habitating with his lover, who's also a parishioner.
  • A homosexual priest in Miami had a lover who was also a priest in the Florida Keys. They co-owned a condominium at a Yacht Club.
  • A member of the Archdiocesan Tribunal owned a condominium on ritzy Bayshore Drive, in Miami, with his male lover.
  • An Archdiocesan official, previously mentioned in this article, sought out "young boys from third-world countries, from unprivileged backgrounds, and recruited them for the Archdiocese's seminaries. These men [were] groomed to engage in sexual relationships with the older homosexual priests of the Archdiocese." Until 1998, this official owned a home with a male lover in northern Miami.
  • Two homosexual priests, each with his own Miami parish, co-habitated in Miami Shores.
  • Two homosexual priests, each with his own parish, were lovers; one liked to go shopping "with the girls" on Lincoln Road for feminine cosmetics; the other used to date one of the Archdiocese's male IT personnel.
  • A homosexual priest in Sunny Isles liked to jog nude on the gay-dominated, clothing-optional beach at nearby Haulover Park.
  • A monsignor liked to flash his willy at young men.
  • A monsignor slept with his female (!) parishioners.
  • A priest got busted attempting to buy sex from an undercover male cop.
  • A homosexual priest pissed off parishioners by using a banana to demonstrate proper condom usage to young children, contrary to the birth-control method prescribed by the Church (abstinence).
  • More recently, an associate pastor had received full pastorship at a church in the Florida Keys after being caught en flagrante delecto with his male lover—while the person who caught him, a Philippino priest, was booted from the Archdiocese.

And these are just the priests about whom something unusual has been said. It excludes the many who were merely non-celibate homosexuals, or who have been accused only of embezzling money. And it excludes the 33 Miami priests (and one nun) accused of criminal sexual abuse. (Of course, there is some overlap.)

It's unlikely that all of these allegations are true, and of the ones that are, it's unlikely that all are symptomatic of corruption or moral depravity. But some must be. Perhaps the most difficult allegations to explain away are those which have attached themselves to two particular individuals, whose names were repeated again and again in interviews and in the pages of "Miami Vice": Monsignor William Hennessey and the erstwhile mentor of Peter P. Fuchs, Father Bernie Kirlin.

Monsignor Hennesey's Bondage Gear

"He's a sweet man, very kind," says a diocesan priest of Bill Hennessey, which is what just about everyone says of the man.
Nicest guy in the diocese, and maybe the most corrupt.

The Catholic Church's Secret Gay Cabal
A passage from an interview transcript included in "Miami Vice" in which an Archdiocese worker claims that Monsignor William Hennessey kept a photo of a male security guard employed by the Archdiocese "dressed like he was a stripper club."

Bill Hennessey spent much of the 70's and 80's as the principal of Monsignor Pace Senior High School, in Miami Gardens, where one of his employees was a young Bill O'Reilly—the shouty Fox News talking head was a history teacher there before he got his start. Hennessey allegedly stole a great deal of money from Pace in a variety of canny ways—for instance, by siphoning money from a trust fund set up for a quadriplegic student. (The student eventually brought charges against Hennessey, some of which stuck.)

When Favalora arrived in the Archdiocese, "the finances were a mess" at Pace High, according to the former diocesan priest, and Hennessey was quietly removed from his position and replaced with his good friend Dr. Richard Perhla. Hennessey was installed as Favalora's "Vicar General"—a kind of Archdiocesan enforcer, who wields the Archbishop's power and acts in his stead.

Meanwhile, Hennessey lived in a condominium in Quayside Towers, in Miami Beach, with a man who was almost certainly his lover. (They had mutual rights of survivorship.) He maintained a friendship with Perhla—himself a gay man with a live-in-lover—and remained on the high school's board of directors. He was joined there by another friend, a physician named Dr. Jerome Waters, who handled physical examinations for Pace students trying out for sports teams. Waters was gay too. In the mid-90's, one of his young lovers apparently shot one of his ex-lovers to death on his lawn.

For years, two rumors about Bill Hennessey circulated endlessly through the Archdiocese. The first was of his passion for bondage gear. The other involved his funky financial relationship with the local high schools, and in particular with the brand-new Archbishop McCarthy High, of which his close friend Dr. Richard Perhla was the first-ever principle.

"There was some kind of stink there, with Hennessey acting as a 'consultant,'" says a diocesan priest. "They'd talk on the phone, Hennessey and Perhla—and remember, these guys are great friends—and then Hennessey would bill Perhla for his time."
Money for nothing.

When Archbishop Wenski assumed control of the Miami Archdiocese, he immediately initiated an audit of the local high schools. The results of the audit have not been published, but they mustn't have been good: Just before the beginning of the recent school year, Perhla was sacked from Archbishop McCarthy High, and was allegedly escorted from the premises by security. Monsignor Hennessey announced his retirement a month later.

A Late-Night Shredding Party

Like Bill Hennessey, Bernie Kirlin's career has been dogged by rumors of financial ill deeds. After he was ejected from a seminarian's bed at St. John Vianney, Kirlin served as a pastor in the Keys, and then in a Miami ghetto. In 1999, Favalora appointed him to lead the congregation at St. Augustine, in Coral Gables, where he replaced Father Terrence Hogan, himself a former employee of St. John Vianney and alleged non-celibate homosexual.

Hogan was much beloved of his congregation, not least of all because of his rigid fiscal discipline. Every month in the parish bulletin, Hogan published a list of the church's expenses and a summary of its balance sheet. When he departed St. Augustine, the parish was more than $2 million in the black. Good thing, too: the physical church had fallen into considerable disrepair.

"We did very little to help the church building," says Maria Diaz, a former member of St. Augustine's Pastoral Council. "We never believed in spending money on brick and mortar. We wanted to help people."


Kirlin's first act upon assuming leadership of the parish was to cease publicizing the church's finances. When Kirlin left eleven years later, his replacement was shocked to discover St. Augustine was $1 million in the red.

No one knows for sure how St. Augustine came to this sad impasse, but speculation must take into account a number of awkward facts, including Kirlin's purchase, in 2002, of a condominium on Brickell Avenue, a glittering stretch of road a few hundred yards from Biscayne Bay. The condo cost $307,000. (In 2002, the average American diocesan priest made $30,000 per year.)

Three years later, an employee of Kirlin's accused him of embezzling church moneys, thereby initiating an internal audit—which was supervised, in part, by Kirlin's long-time friend and alleged boyfriend Monsignor Michael Souckar, whom Kirlin had first met on that long-ago night when he treated Souckar, Peter P. Fuchs, and another "hot" St. John Vianney student to dinner. During the audit, Kirlin allegedly threw a late-night paper shredding party in the rectory. Then he fired his accuser, who in turn sued the Archdiocese for violating whistle-blower protection laws. The Archdiocese settled out of court, and the plaintiff was compelled to sign a non-disparagement agreement. She would not comment for this story.

Wenski's Clean-up

Favalora resigned eight months before attaining the age of 75—the age at which Archbishops customarily tender their resignations. A friend of his replacement says she knows why.

"For ages [the Vatican] had been begging [Bishop Thomas] Wenski to come and clean up Favalora's mess, but Wenski wouldn't work with the man. He said 'Favalora's got to go before I come down there.'"
So Favalora went.

The September after Favalora's ouster (if it was indeed an ouster), the Miami Herald ran a brief item detailing some of the changes instituted in the Archdiocese during the first few months of Wenski's reign. Mostly, it was a matter of priest-shuffling; moving clerics from one parish to another.

The priests named in "Miami Vice" were disproportionately well-represented in the Herald's account of the shuffle. Of the 35 priests accused by name in the binder, seven had retired already. Of those remaining, most have been reassigned.

Wenski shuffled personnel at all levels of the diocese. Souckar was sent to Rome to pursue "advanced studies." Morales, the All Saints pastor who clashed with Dowgiert, was demoted to "parochial vicar." So was another priest accused of keeping a boyfriend in the rectory. According to canon law, such demotions are very grave. According to custom, they are very rare.

Dowgiert has disappeared. A background check suggests he may have spent some time in Washington state before dropping off the map. Maybe he's in Poland.

Big questions remain in the Archdiocese. Arguably the worst pedophile priest ever arrested in the United States, Neil Doherty, is a St. John Vianney alum who spent most of his career in Florida. He served as the seminary's vocational director under Robert Lynch. For thirty years, Doherty raped child after child, drugging them with alcohol and Qualudes and sodomizing them until they bled. He was one of Kirlin's closest friends, and enjoyed sleepovers in his condo. How much did Kirlin know? Souckar? Favalora?

The Church isn't talking, but it may be acting. Apart from priest-shuffling, there is a rumor circulating among South Floridian clerics that Archbishop Wenski has hired private investigators to monitor Miami's priests. Christifidelis lays low, hoping it's true; that the Archdiocese's long orgy of sodomy and illicit cash is finished. If not, we'll be hearing from them again.

Go to The Lamb Slain Home Page