Showing posts with label Civil Rights Abuses. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Civil Rights Abuses. Show all posts

September 10, 2011

Establishment Using 10-year Anniversary of 911 to Instill Greater Fear

Will government commandeer private pension plans, 401Ks and IRA’s in return for a government guaranteed annuity; will these retirement plans be traded for US Treasuries; or like one bill says, limit the amounts that can be removed and how many times you can remove funds?...Tax loopholes will be closed, Social Security and Medicare will be capped in the midst of roaring inflation, and tax brackets will be adjusted to increase the tax bite. This exercise is called Cut, Cap and Balance. HR 2560 only perpetuates the status quo. The sad fact is there is no balance in this idea. There is no real attempt to cut anything, except Social Security and Medicare, so the military industrial complex can continue to reap profits and kill off our young in undeclared no-win wars, only designed to plunder countries. Of course, the excuse for this is the global war on terror, which has never and does not exist. Wars are to be endless and perpetual in the search of peace. - Economic Recovery Remains Elusive, International Forecaster Weekly, July 23, 2011

9/11 Hype: False Flag Programming in Full Bloom

By Zen Gardner
September 10, 2011

They're at it again big time, folks, and really cranking it up. Beware. Not of the terrorists....of THEM!.

The "warnings" generated by the Big Brother State are coming at us fast and furious. And following patterns and narratives engrained in our brains for decades now. We've seen this before from Waco to Oklahoma City, from overseas "attacks" on military targets by "extremists" to 9/11, we've been TOLD who the enemy is. Period. And it's bogus.

Here's how the sheeple will be "primed" for the next "attact":

Sources: Authorities Concerned About Possible Dirty Bomb, Times Square Strike

Say Al Qaeda Eager To Hit Where They Failed, Just Like 9/11 Following 1993

NEW YORK (CBSNewYork) — Just two days before the 10th anniversary, New York City is on high alert.

Federal and local authorities have beefed up security after receiving intelligence about a credible threat. The alleged plot by al Qaeda involves detonating car bombs on bridges and in tunnels in New York and Washington D.C. to coincide with the anniversary of 9/11.

"Freak Out, Everyone"

One thing about warning people is you have to be credible. Problem is, when it comes to warnings about your supposed safety, we all tend to err on the safe side. So it's pretty easy for them to corral the populace through fear. After all, they're the "authorities" and have been herding the sheep for ages.

Such manipulation it's infuriating.

The Shifty Face of Fear

But look at the would-be fear generating "pot shots" being taken at us from all sides:

  • Obama says recently look for the lone gunman...(last year he said mini-nukes)

  • Napolitano now says watch for bomb-laden vehicles..including dirty bombs..as if some of them are clean.. (last week it was small planes...)

US Alert Over 'Credible 9/11 Terror Threat'

Officials say manhunt is under way for suspects as New York and Washington raise security ahead of attacks' anniversary.

US officials have said they are investigating a credible but unconfirmed threat of a terror attack, reportedly involving bomb-laden vehicles ahead of this weekend's 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.

"There is specific, credible but unconfirmed threat information," the Department of Homeland Security said in a statement on Thursday.

"We have taken, and will continue to take all steps necessary to mitigate any threats that arise," the department added in a statement.

Law enforcement sources said a manhunt was under way for two or three suspects, the Reuters news agency reported. Source

Credible Threat? What does that mean?

Anyone can say that about anything! Earthquakes? Credible. Nuclear war? Credible. That our government is run by idiotic despots?....VERY credible....

Can anyone can say anything about anything and it gets reported as credible?

No. The catch is that's really only the case, when it's about terrorism.

Getting the picture?

And Now the latest: Whoever it is, THEY'RE AMERICANS!

2 Terror Suspects May Be U.S. Citizens

WASHINGTON (AP) — Al Qaeda may have sent American terrorists or men carrying U.S. travel documents to launch an attack on Washington or New York to coincide with memorials marking the 10th anniversary of 9/11, government officials say.

One U.S. official says al Qaeda dispatched three men, at least two of whom could be U.S. citizens, to detonate a car bomb in one of the cities. Should that mission prove impossible, the attackers have been told to simply cause as much destruction as they can. source

That, My Friends, Will Be The New Mantra - Guaranteed

Whoever "they" are going to be broad-brushed as, they're "one of us". Just as the deliberately middle class white skinned "Christian" massacred so many innocents in Oslo, whatever transpires next will likely be pinned on, involve or implicate someone representing middle class America, the protest and alternative community, or the internet "threat".

Freedom doesn't seem to go well with Orwellian authoritarianism, does it.

And why all this? Because the citizens of the United States are the real enemy and we must be controlled. Period. It'll happen sooner or later if all goes according to their plan.

The Empowering Epilogue

But sharing information and truth and love DOES make a difference, even one hungry soul at a time. Don't let all this big brother idiocy get you down, but do be aware of what they're up to.

And please, make an effort to connect with and talk to others. You'll be surprised and encouraged how many have caught on and are trapped in their personal predicament and will welcome a kindred spirit into their lives.

Stay vigilant. Keep communicating.

Two Terror Suspects May Be U.S. Citizens

The Associated Press
September 10, 2011

Al-Qaida may have sent American terrorists or men carrying U.S. travel documents to launch an attack on Washington or New York to coincide with memorials marking the 10th anniversary of 9/11, government officials say.

One U.S. official says al-Qaida dispatched three men, at least two of whom could be U.S. citizens, to detonate a car bomb in one of the cities. Should that mission prove impossible, the attackers have been told to simply cause as much destruction as they can.

Word that al-Qaida had ordered the mission reached U.S. officials midweek. A CIA informant who has proved reliable in the past approached intelligence officials overseas to say that the men had been ordered by newly minted al-Qaida leader Ayman al Zawahri to mark the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks Sunday by doing harm on U.S. soil.

The tipster says the would-be attackers are of Arab descent and may speak Arabic as well as English. Counterterrorism officials were looking for certain names associated with the threat, but it was unclear whether the names were real or fake.

Counterterrorism officials have been working around the clock to determine whether the threat is accurate, but so far, have been unable to corroborate it, the officials said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss the investigation.

In the meantime, extra security was put in place to protect the people in the two cities that took the brunt of the jetliner attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon a decade ago. It was the worst terror assault in the nation's history, and al-Qaida has long dreamed of striking again to mark the anniversary. But it could be weeks before the intelligence community can say whether this particular threat is real.

Undaunted by talk of a new terror threat, New Yorkers and Washingtonians wove among police armed with assault rifles and waited with varying degrees of patience at security checkpoints Friday.

Security worker Eric Martinez wore a pin depicting the twin towers on his lapel as he headed to work in lower Manhattan where he also worked 10 years ago when the towers came down.

"If you're going to be afraid, you're just going to stay home," he said.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg, too, made a point of taking the subway to City Hall.

Briefed on the threat Friday morning, President Barack Obama instructed his security team to take "all necessary precautions," the White House said. Obama still planned to travel to New York on Sunday to mark the 10th anniversary with stops that day at the Pentagon and Shanksville, Pa.

Washington commuters were well aware of the terror talk.

Cheryl Francis, of Chantilly, Va., said she travels over the Roosevelt bridge into Washington every day and doesn't plan to change her habits. Francis, who was in Washington on Sept. 11, 2001, said a decade later the country is more aware and alert.

"It's almost like sleeping with one eye open," she said, but she added that people need to continue living their lives.

The intelligence community regularly receives tips and information of this nature. But the timing of this particular threat had officials especially concerned, because it was the first "active plot" that came to light as the country marked the significant anniversary, a moment that was also significant to al-Qaida, according to information gleaned in May from Osama bin Laden's compound.

The U.S. government has long known that terrorists see the 10th anniversary of 9/11 and other uniquely American dates as opportunities to strike. Officials have also been concerned that some may see this anniversary as an opportunity to avenge bin Laden's death.

Britain, meanwhile, warned its citizens who are traveling to the U.S. that there was a potential for new terror attacks that could include "places frequented by expatriates and foreign travelers."

Acutely aware of these factors, law enforcement around the country had already increased security measures at airports, nuclear plants, train stations and more in the weeks leading up to Sept. 11. The latest threat, potentially targeting New York or Washington, prompted an even greater security surge in those cities. U.S. embassies and consulates abroad had also boosted their vigilance in preparation for the anniversary.

At Penn Station in New York, transit authority police carried assault rifles and wore helmets and bullet proof vests as they watched crowds of commuters. Police searched passengers' bags as they entered the subway, and National Guard troops in camouflage fatigues moved among riders, eyeing packages.

In Washington, Police Chief Cathy Lanier warned that unattended cars parked in suspicious locations or near critical buildings and structures would be towed.

Speaking in New York, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said there was "a specific, credible but unconfirmed report that al-Qaida, again, is seeking to harm Americans and in particular, to target New York and Washington."

NY, DC Police on Alert Following 9/11 Threat

KABC-TV Los Angeles, CA
September 9, 2011

Police in New York and Washington, D.C., are on alert following word of a credible terror threat meant to coincide with the Sept. 11 anniversary.

It's another ominous sounding threat, but one many on the East Coast have gotten used to in the decade since the attacks.

Officials describe the latest threat as credible but unconfirmed.

The information comes from a source in Pakistan indicating al Qaeda's new leader, Ayman al-Zawahiri, wants to strike the U.S. around the anniversary of Sept. 11. The information indicates that three suspects flew from Pakistan to the U.S. in August, and one of them could be a U.S. citizen.

Officials told ABC News the plot involved three individuals, including at least one American citizen who arrived in the U.S. by plane in August. Their apparent targets were the same two cities attacked 10 years ago.

"The new leader, Zawahiri, has said he wants an attack around now to avenge bin Laden and to prove that al Qaeda central, the one in Pakistan and Afghanistan, is still alive," said Richard Clark, ABC security expert.

Officials said the plot could involve a car or truck bomb similar to the failed attack on Times Square last year. Police are now giving vehicles even more attention, and security has been heightened in and around both cities.

Still, local leaders don't want citizens to live in fear.

"I just think that if I take the subway, it sort of puts it in perspective that there's always a threat, but there's not any reason why we should hunker down," said New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg.

So far, Los Angeles has not been mentioned in the intelligence gathered, but the city has been the target of past attacks. Authorities are reminding citizens to stay alert.

"If you see something, as a member of the public, that doesn't make sense to you, particularly on this anniversary of the most terrific attack to occur on American soil, say something," said LAPD Chief Charlie Beck.

There are indications the attack could be aimed at bridges and tunnels. Police in New York and the Washington D.C. area warned residents that cars left unattended near sensitive targets will be towed.

Booga Booga: Fear Ramped Up With Yet Another 9/11 Anniversary Terror Warning

Infowars.com
September 9, 2011

The Department of Homeland Security has issued yet another terror warning today, ordering security to be stepped up owing to a “credible and specific” intelligence report that al Qaeda is planning to blow up bridges or tunnels in New York on the 10th anniversary of 9/11.

The terror warning is just the latest in a series of advisories from Big Sis and the White House, all of which have been lacking in detail and described as “unconfirmed”.

Sky News reports that the latest warning comes from “a reliable source”, but remains “uncorroborated” because it has not been backed up by any other intelligence.

“There is specific, credible but unconfirmed threat information,” said Janice Fedarcyk, the assistant director in charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) New York division.

Details are sketchy, however, with the only specifics linking the threat to Pakistan and to a car or truck bomb.

New York mayor Michael Bloomberg has ordered police to ramp up security at subways, with more random bag inspections, and to deploy radiation monitoring equipment.

The warning comes just days after a previous DHS advisory that al qaeda followers may attack the US with small aircraft on the anniversary of 9/11.

Again, the warning contained no specific information, but was aimed at airports, ordering heightened surveillance.

Another general warning was issued last week by the State Department.

The department said it had not identified any “specific threats” about possible attacks but that al Qaeda and its affiliates had “demonstrated the intent and capability to carry out attacks” against the U.S. and U.S. interests.

Establishment figurehead such as US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta have been out in force, hyping the possibility of another 9/11.

The numerous warnings have come along with a slew of reports from the government expressing fears that homegrown terrorists are growing in number inside the US and that the internet is radicalizing a new wave of jihadis. Again, specific details are lacking.

In addition, television networks have begun broadcasting an onslaught of 9/11 tenth anniversary specials as the establishment desperately tries to reinforce the myth that terrorists pose any more threat to Americans than intestinal illnesses or allergic reactions to peanuts.

As the major networks saturate our screens with documentary after documentary about how ‘the world changed on 9/11′, it’s important to point out that the only genuine change has been the growth of a gigantic and oppressive Homeland Security surveillance state that feeds on fear and ignorance of the facts.

We have previously documented how such terror alerts have been routinely hyped purely for political purposes.

Never forget that the media and the government have been totally discredited over and over again by their complicity in issuing phony terror alerts designed to manipulate elections and frighten the public into slavish acquiescence.

Just as former Homeland Security chief Tom Ridge admitted that DHS would issue fake terror alerts shortly before elections in a bid to influence the outcome during the Bush era, the Obama administration is mimicking the same tactic.

Ridge said he “was pushed to raise the security alert on the eve of President Bush’s re-election, something he saw as politically motivated and worth resigning over.”

Fast forward seven years and you find exactly the same tactics being employed.

Warnings in October last year of a supposed al-Qaeda attack on targets in Europe were exaggerated by the Obama administration for political purposes, senior Pakistani diplomats and European intelligence officials told the London Guardian.

No terror event occurred.

“It was nothing specific, nothing very new,” said Swedish Justice Minister Beatrice Ask after the official warning. “We agree that there is no indication of concrete targets, concrete dates and concrete terror groups,” added German Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere.

British intelligence officials admitted that there was no evidence whatsoever to suggest that a significant terror plot was imminent, describing the suggestions as “irritating”.

The furor surrounding the non-existant terror plot generated headlines such as“Britain gripped by Al Qaeda terror plot fear” with graphics depicting possible targets and warnings that “a Mumbai-type plot would ‘outmatch’ the police and turn London into a war zone” with people being brutally “murdered one by one” – all based on nothing but media hype:

Earlier this year, when the freedom stripping PATRIOT ACT was up for renewal, DHS head Janet Napolitano officially notified a congressional panel that the US was facing the greatest possibility of a major terror attack since 9/11.

Big Sis noted that there was “an increased emphasis on recruiting Americans and Westerners to carry out small scale attacks.”

Three of the PATRIOT Act’s most draconian provisions were duly extended for a further year by House Republicans.

Every other “terror plot” since 9/11 that has materialized into anything beyond a vague and non specific warning has been exposed as either artificially engineered or seized upon and used by the federal government, with the enthusiastic support of the corporate media, to provide justification for more funding, more power, and more authority to continue the “war on terror” and a gross clampdown on freedom.

Just a brief reprisal of such instances gives a telling insight.

On January 27, 2010, the Detroit News reported how the State Department refused to revoke Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab’s visa despite the fact that he was on a terror watch list and allowed him to board the plane, allegedly in order to avoid tipping off a wider investigation.

After weeks of stonewalling, authorities quietly reversed the official story behind the aborted attack and acknowledged that an accomplice was involved, despite weeks of denial and derision of eyewitness Kurt Haskell’s description of a sharp-dressed man who helped Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab board Flight 253 in Amsterdam.

Detroit lawyer Kurt Haskell maintained from the beginning that he saw a well-dressed Indian man aid the accused bomber to board the plane despite the fact that he had no passport and was on a terror watch list.

“While Mutallab was poorly dressed, his friend was dressed in an expensive suit, Haskell said. He says the suited man asked ticket agents whether Mutallab could board without a passport. “The guy said, ‘He’s from Sudan and we do this all the time,’” reported the Michigan Live news website.

FBI agents interviewed Haskell and he told them about the sharp-dressed man but officials refused to admit that a wider conspiracy was at hand, stoically maintaining the official story that Abdulmutallab had acted alone. Authorities claimed that videotapes did not show a second man accompanying Abdulmutallab and yet they refused to release any footage of the alleged bomber.

There seems little doubt that Abdulmutallab had at least one accomplice if not more. Authorities have remained silent on other eyewitness reports which described a man intently filming the alleged terrorist throughout the whole flight, a connection that strongly suggests the attempted bomber was involved in some kind of drill and that his strings were being pulled by people in more senior positions.

The Delta 253 incident was just one of the dozens of terror busts and stings since 9/11 to have been orchestrated by handlers aiding the accused terrorists at every turn. We have never come across a major case where the terrorists involved in a plot were not being prodded by the FBI and federal informants, or where clear prior knowledge and forewarning was not evident.

Take the case of Fort Hood shooter Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, who repeatedly communicated with alleged Al-Qaeda leaders for nearly a year before his rampage. The FBI knew Hasan was sending emails to terrorists, but they did nothing, allowed him to remain on a U.S. Army base, and even invited him to participate in Homeland Security exercises.

Hasan, “Sent 10 to 20 e-mails to several terror-related Islamic figures, including Anwar Aulaqi, a radical imam from Virginia who has been openly propagandizing for al Qaeda in Yemen and who had ties to several of the 9/11 hijackers,” reported the New York Post.

As Webster Tarpley reported, Aulaqi is “an intelligence agency operative and patsy-minder” and “one of the premier terror impresarios of the age operating under Islamic fundamentalist cover” whose job it is to “motivate and encourage groups of mentally impaired and suggestible young dupes who were entrapped into “terrorist plots” by busy FBI and Canadian RCMP agents during recent years.”

Tarpley points to Aulaqi’s role in the Toronto and Fort Dix, New Jersey, terror plots, which were both contrived by the feds, as proof of Aulaqi’s usefulness to the authorities in radicalizing terrorist patsies.

Lawyers in a case relating to the much vaunted 2007 terror plot to attack Fort Dix and kill “as many soldiers as possible” concluded that FBI informants were the key figures behind the operation and that the accused, six foreign-born Muslims, were merely bungling patsies.

Similarly, the “Toronto” terrorists turned out to be “a bunch of incompetent guys who were primarily misled by a delusional megalomaniac”. The explosive fertilizer material the terrorist cell apparently planned to use was in fact purchased by an informant working for the RCMP who had radicalized the group.

Hasan’s direct relationship with FBI operative and ace patsy-minder Aulaqi provides strong evidence that the Fort Hood shooter was being watched very carefully long before he went on his tragic rampage.

Hundreds of terror suspects (read: patsies and mental deficients) have been convicted in civilian federal courts, including convicted shoe bomber Richard Reid who attended the Finsbury Park Mosque in North London. The Finsbury imam at the time was Abu Hamza al-Masri who began working with British Security Services in 1997. A large number of the supposed terrorists convicted in American courts were entrapped by the FBI in classic COINTELPRO fashion and did not have links to the CIA-created al-Qaeda. The entrapped were often fuzzy on al-Qaeda or what it represents.

In the media-lauded Miami terror case in 2007, the supposed ringleader Narseal “Prince Marina” Batiste “had heard of Al-Qaeda, but wasn’t sure what it stood for. The FBI instigators made Batiste swear loyalty to al-Qaida; then had him call on his local buddies to form an ‘Islamic army’ in Miami. None had military training. Some could barely read. But Batiste assured the group in the midst of its collective marijuana buzz of greatness ahead,”wrote Saul Landau.

These were the men who comedian John Stewart referred to as “seven dipshits in a warehouse” after Attorney General Alberto Gonzales had ludicrously told the press that the group of semi-retarded gang-bangers had planned to “wage a ground war against America”.

One of the more recent examples was the case of the so-called Muslim terrorists busted in New York, who supposedly wanted to blow up synagogues in the Bronx and shoot down military airplanes flying out of the New York Air National Guard base. The men were provided with fake explosives and inactive missiles by an FBI informant, reported the Christian Science Monitor. Two of the ringleaders of the “deadly” plot which was endlessly hyped by the media turned out to be semi-retarded potheads, exactly as we had predicted would be the case due to the innumerable past cases with the exact same modus operandi.

The federal authorities seem none too concerned about stopping any real terrorists and are instead obsessed with manufacturing patsies, bankrolling, radicalizing and prodding rag-tag groups to attempt attacks so that the massive slush fund that is the “war on terror” can be prolonged, while the corporate media relishes each opportunity to politicize such events to demonize peaceful resistance to big government as “violent extremism”.

With this insidious partnership now colluding to produce a constant supply of Abdul Mutallabs on an almost monthly basis, we can expect to see many more domestic terror alerts and “attacks”, be they genuine, provocateured, or outright staged, and with each one the calls to crush free speech and censor the right to express dissent on the Internet will build to a crescendo, with little or no investigation on behalf of the mainstream media as to how such attacks came about in the first place, and who was really behind them.

These and countless other over hyped and completely manufactured threats have led directly to programs such as the “See Something, Say Something” campaign – a literal citizen spy operation overseen by the DHS, that is creating more paranoia and hysteria, if anything serving to make any real terror threat more likely to go undiscovered.

The endless terror alerts, whether real or phony, are now being issued via the mainstream media and beamed directly to mobile phones and home computers over social networking sites, and even via Emergency Alert broadcasts.

In addition to the invasion of traditional and new social media, The Federal Communications Commission announced recently that it has approved a presidential alert system.

Commissioners voted in February to require television and radio stations, cable systems and satellite TV providers to participate in a test that would have them receive and transmit a live code that includes an alert message issued by the president. No date has been set for the test, according to the Washington Post, which described it as being like something out of Orwell’s1984.

Soon enough the creepy and invasive broadcasts that are already being played on giant telescreens in Walmarts across the nation may be playing in your front room.

The DHS is slowly creeping into the lives of every American to the point where it can no longer be sidestepped. Fattened federal agencies are using the over hyped threat of terrorism as an excuse to normalize the notion that the people are servants of the government, rather than the government acting as servant to the people.

The September 11 anniversary provides a unique opportunity for the establishment to reanimate their flagging war on terror with a new round of fear-mongering propaganda. The event will allow them to exploit decade old footage of the attacks in order to insist that there remains a threat large enough to require Gestapo goons at airports, a high-tech surveillance grid, and the point by point dismantlement of the Bill of Rights.

U.S. Ups Security in NYC and D.C. in Face of ‘Credible’ 9/11 Threat (Video)

CarbonatedTV.com
September 9, 2011

The U.S. has beefed up security in NYC and Washington D.C. in response to a ‘credible’ but not ‘corroborated’ 9/11 threat that officials believe is planned Sunday on the 10th anniversary of the September 11 terrorist attacks on the Twin Towers and Washington. In the video below, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg addresses the public about the threat, the strengthened security and what residents should do in the face of the threat.

"The best thing that we can do to fight terror is to refuse to be intimidated by it," NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg says in the video from Thursday night, promising to take the subway to and from work Friday. He says that while officials have received "credible" information that an attack may be planned for September 11 2011, this Sunday, that citizens of New York cannot live in fear. "For 10 years we have not allowed terrorists to intimidate us. We have lived our lives without fear, and we will continue to do so."

Intelligence officials say the potential September 11 threat is centered around three individuals with al Qaeda ties, whom they learned about through tips, intercepted conversations and intel found in Osama bin Laden’s former compound in Pakistan. They believe one of the individuals is a U.S. citizen, but have not confirmed whether or not any of the individuals are within U.S. borders.

U.S. officials believe the operatives came out of the tribal Pakistan-Afghanistan border region and that they are part of al Qaeda "central," but that there is also a possibility that Pakistan-based groups like LET or TTP are involved.

While there has been concern over the introduction of a radioactive isotope, or "dirty bomb," officials say they believe the direct threat is a vehicle laden with explosives, but add that "the intelligence picture is not completely formed," according to a senior official.

The heightened security was visible in NYC and Washington Friday, in the form of several police checkpoints following reports of the potential vehicle-borne strike. This is causing a number of traffic delays throughout NYC, with especially troublesome traffic near the George Washington Bridge, which links New Jersey with New York City, as well as the Queens Midtown Tunnel, the Holland Tunnel and the Verrazano Bridge, which links Staten Island and Brooklyn.

The NYPD is also sweeping garages for explosives, using digital license plate readers to check for stolen vehicles. More on the effect this has to NYC, in particular, and more information about the 9/11 threat itself, can be seen in the video below.

March 25, 2009

Pitting 'We the People' Against Each Other

It Should Be 'We the People' Against the Financial Elite:
"The Rulers of the Darkness of This World,
Spiritual Wickedness in High Places (Ephesians 6:12)."


The Radical Polarization of Law Enforcement

By Patrick Wood, Editor, The August Review
March 18, 2009

Patriots, Christians and concerned citizens are increasingly in the cross hairs of the U.S. intelligence community, and battle lines are being quietly drawn that could soon pit our own law enforcement and military forces against us.

A February 20 report entitled "The Modern Militia Movement" was issued by the Missouri Information Analysis Center (MIAC) that paints mainstream patriotic Americans as dangerous threats to law enforcement and to the country. Operating under the Missouri State Highway Patrol, the MIAC is listed as a Fusion Center that was established in cooperation with the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice.

Because authenticity of the report was questioned by some, this writer contacted Missouri state Representative Jim Guest (R-King City) who had personally verified that the report had indeed been issued. Rep. Guest is chairman of the Personal Privacy Committee and is a prominent leader in the national blowback against the Real ID Act of 2005, which requires states to issue uniform driver's licenses containing personal biometric data. (See Guest Warns Against Big Brother, Real ID)

Rep. Guest stated that he was "shocked and outraged" at the report, which clearly paints him and many other elected state leaders, as a potential threats to law enforcement.

Instead of focusing on actual criminal incidents of "home-grown" terrorism, the MIAC report instead lists issues that it believes are common to the threats it perceives. Thus, Americans involved with the following issues are highly suspect:
  • "Ammunition Accountability Act" - Requiring each bullet to to be serialized and registered to the purchaser.
  • "Anticipation of the economic collapse of the U.S. Government" - Prominent scholars and economists are openly debating the bankruptcy and insolvency of the United States government.

  • "Possible Constitutional Convention (Con Con)" - 32 states have called for a Constitutional Convention to force Congress and the Executive Branch into a balanced budget, but many are concerned that, if called, Con Con would be taken over by hostile interests who would introduce Amendments that are harmful to national sovereignty.
  • "North American Union" - MIAC states that "Conspiracy theorists claim that this union would link Canada, the United States, and Mexico. The NAU would unify its monetary system and trade the dollar for the AMERO. Associated with this theory is concern over a NAFTA Superhighway, which would fast-track trade between the three nations. There is additional concern that the NAU would open up the border, causing security risks and free movement for immigrants."
  • "Universal Service Program" - Statements made by President-Elect Obama and his chief of staff have led extremists to fear the creation of a Civilian Defense Force. This theory requires all citizens between the ages of 18 and 25 to be forced to attend three months of mandatory training." (This is exactly what Obama and Rahm Emmanuel have repeatedly stated on national TV, and thus is hardly a theory.)
  • "Radio Frequency Identification (RFID)" - This includes human implantation, but the larger concern is universal ID cards and personal property identification that can be read electronically without the bearer's knowledge.
Citizens who are concerned about the above issues are then lumped into radical ideologies such as Christian Identity, White Nationalists (e.g., neo-Nazi, Skinheads, etc.) and anti-Semites. Tax Resisters and Anti-Immigration Advocates are thrown into the same category.

The MIAC report then sternly warns law enforcement personnel: "You are the Enemy: the militia subscribes to an anti-government and NWO mind set, which creates a threat to law enforcement officers. They view the military, National Guard, and law enforcement as a force that will confiscate their firearms and place them in FEMA concentration camps."

On the last page of the MIAC report, a section listing Political Paraphernalia (flags and symbols) states:
"Militia members most commonly associate with 3rd party political groups. It is not uncommon for militia members to display Constitutional Party, Campaign for Liberty, or Libertarian material. These members are usually supporters of former Presidential Candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr.

Militia members commonly display picture, cartoons, and bumper stickers that contain anti-government rhetoric. Most of this material will depict the FRS, IRS, FBI, ATF, CIA, UN, Law Enforcement, and the 'New World Order' in a derogatory manor (sic). Additionally, racial, anti-immigration, and anti-abortion material may be displayed by militia members."
What was the ostensible genesis of all these "threats" to law enforcement? The report explains it this way:
"Academics contend that female and minority empowerment in the 1970s and 1960s caused a blow to white male's sense of empowerment. This, combined with a sense of defeat from the Vietnam War, increased levels of immigration and unemployment, and spawned a paramilitary culture. This caught on in the 1980s with injects such as Tom Clancy novels, Solder of Fortune Magazine, and movies such as Rambo that glorified combat. This culture glorified white males and portrayed them as morally upright heroes who were mentally and physically tough."

"It was during this timeframe that many individuals and organizations began to concoct conspiracy theories to explain their misfortunes. These theories varied but almost always involved a globalist dictatorship the 'New World Order' (NWO), which conspired to exploit the working class citizens."
In other words, these "ridiculous NWO theories" were created by psychological deviants who were trying to justify their own self-induced misfortunes.

Fear Ye, All Troopers

For unsuspecting law enforcement personnel, this MIAC training document polarizes unsuspecting officers to fear peaceful, law-abiding citizens, and it greatly increases the risk of armed confrontation. For instance, a routine traffic stop would be escalated if the officer observes a Ron Paul or Chuck Baldwin bumper sticker on the rear bumper of the car. The mere possession of printed material, such as the U.S. Constitution or Bill of Rights, would be viewed as subversive, even though most officers are required to take an oath to "defend and uphold the Constitution of the United States" as a condition of their employment.

Additionally, troopers are indoctrinated that all such topics are pure fantasy and without any factual basis. Even if they had their own concerns, they would be ridiculed into accepting the position that all criticism of the New World Order is dangerous to their well being.

The Columbia Daily Tribune (Columbia, Missouri) reports this concern from local resident Tim Neal, who apparently fits the MIAC's "Modern Militia" profile:

“If a police officer is pulling me over with my family in the car, and he sees a bumper sticker on my vehicle that has been specifically identified as one that an extremist would have in their vehicle, the guy is probably going to be pretty apprehensive and not thinking in a rational manner, and this guy’s walking up to my vehicle with a gun.” [see 'Fusion Center' draws fire over assertions]
MIAC is a Fusion Center

As mentioned above, the Missouri Information Analysis Center is one of a network of over 50 Fusion Centers around the country.

According to the National Criminal Intelligence Resource Center (NCIRC), a Fusion Center is "a collaborative effort of two or more agencies that provide resources, expertise, and/or information to the center with the goal of maximizing the ability to detect, prevent, apprehend and respond to criminal and terrorist activity."

As of 2006, the NCIRC listed 50 Fusion Centers in various states.

Most importantly, the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security are the driving forces behind Fusion Centers, having published "Fusion Center Guidelines: Developing and Sharing Information and Intelligence in a New World." This report headlines "Fusion" as "Turning Information and Intelligence Into Actionable Knowledge."

Fusion Centers are one of five areas of information sharing under the Information Sharing Environment (ISE) that was established by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004.

ISE membership includes the Department of Commerce, CIA, Department of Defense, Director of National Intelligence, Department of Energy, FBI, Health and Human Services, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Department of Homeland Security, National Counter-Terrorism Center, Department of Interior, Office of Management and Budget, Department of Justice, Department of State, Department of Transportation, and the Department of Treasury.

According to one white paper (on the ISE web site) entitled The Intelligence Fusion Process for State, Local and Tribal Law Enforcement: "The most important output of the intelligence Fusion Center is actionable intelligence. This means that the intelligence produced by the center will drive operational responses and strategic awareness of threats." Accordingly, "the heart of good intelligence analysis is to have a diverse array of valid and reliable raw information for analysis. The more robust the raw information, the more accurate the analytic output (i.e., intelligence) will be."

The above mentioned MIAC report, issued by an official Fusion Center, is apparently part of this "diverse array of valid and reliable raw information."

However, ISE's understanding of intelligence is foolish. Any intelligence analyst knows that so-called raw information is treated as garbage until verified from multiple sources to validate accuracy, completeness and freedom from bias. Secondly, analytic output depends upon trained and experienced human reasoning and judgment, not on the "robustness" of the raw information itself.

Where Do Fusion Centers Get Inputs?

According to their own documents, Fusion Centers are "seeded" with ideas for analysis by the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security. Although this is problematic in itself, attention is better directed to the left-wing nonprofit organization, Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC).

Upon careful word and theme comparison between the MIAC report and SPLC literature, it is apparent that there is a significant link between the two. Either MIAC received training or training material from SPLC or some of its personnel had some previous exposure to it.

The SPLC aggressively offers training to local, state and federal law enforcement agencies. According to the SPLC web site, "We focus on the history, background, leaders and activities of far-right extremists in the U.S." and states that it "is internationally known for its tolerance education programs, its legal victories against white supremacists, and its tracking of hate groups."

Hate crimes are essentially acts of vilification of a victim because of his or her membership in a certain social group, such as racial, religious, sexual orientation, nationality, gender, etc. While hate crimes are wrong under any circumstance, the SPLC sees no conflict in profiling conservative whites, Christians, Constitutionalists, and Patriots as being associated with, if not responsible for, hate crimes in America. This is the pot calling the kettle black.

For instance, consider the SPLC statement: "...a basic fact about all three movements - Patriots, white supremacists and anti-abortion militants - are all fueled by interpretations of religion."

Aside from the fact that this sweeping generalization is plainly not true, it is mud-slinging at its best: Patriots are lumped in with white supremacists and anti-abortionists are militants, and all are driven by an obviously irrational and fanatical application of religion.

In another SPLC article about a tragic killing in South Carolina entitled "The Abbeville Horror," the writer goes well beyond just the facts of the story and is careful to sprinkle in words and phrases such as patriots, tax protestors, sovereign citizens, anti-government extremists, New World Order paranoia, disarming U.S. citizens, hard-line Christian Right, constitutional rights, anti-government "patriot" literature, anti-Semitic conspiracy, "Live Free or Die," Ruby Ridge and Waco, Second Amendment, extremist organizing, "closet extremists," paranoid beliefs, "Give me liberty or give me death." [quotes appear in original text]

These are the same kinds of words and themes that are seen in The Modern Militia Movement article, where distinctions between good and bad people are blurred and confused: all are guilty by association, if nothing else.

Should a private organization like SPLC be allowed to provide official training to public-entrusted law enforcement agencies? Most would say, "No." Even if the training were free, the agency should reject influence from the public sector, and even more so if it presents biased and one-sided information that is claimed to be factual.

Conclusion

It is critical to understand that the legitimate law enforcement agencies of cities, counties and states are not adversaries of the people. They are greatly needed for protection against crime and for keeping order in our communities.

They are, however, being methodically seeded with very wrongheaded and dangerous information, the specific intent of which is to polarize law enforcement against peaceful citizens who simply care about the downfall of their country.

This writer interviewed Chuck Baldwin and asked about how he felt when he first saw his good name associated with those who would threaten bodily harm to law enforcement agencies. "Personally, I was stunned," he said, "but my family has taken this very personally as well. This is more than disturbing."

When asked about the possible affect of the report on the Constitution Party, of which he was the 2008 presidential candidate, he replied, "I think it will galvanize people and help them to understand the nature of the battle we are in. Freedom must be defended."

In fact, the MIAC report has created a firestorm all over America. Tens of thousands of protests are being called, written, emailed and faxed to authorities and legislators in Missouri. It would not be surprising to see the report rescinded and an apology given.

Even so, behind-the-scene groups like the SPLC will continue unabated and undeterred in their effort to misinform and disrupt healthy community relations with worthy law enforcement agencies and personnel.

The message to every jurisdiction: Don't let it happen!

Final Thought

Locate the Fusion Center in your state and keep a close eye on the information they are releasing. Stay close to as many law enforcement personnel as you can, asking them to keep their eyes open for reports similar to the Missouri report. Petition your state legislators to ban law enforcement training by private organizations such as the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Missouri State Police Orders Halt to MIAC Report Distribution
Complete List of Other MIAC Reports
'Modern Militia Movement' Report Written with ADL Assistance
Stimulus Funds Go to Build North Carolina Fusion Center
15 More Cities on Homeland Security Terror-Risk List
Britain to Train 60,000 Service Industry Staff to Recognize Terrorist Threats
DHS Video - Targeting Partiotic Americans as Terrorists
Self Righteous Neocon Republicans Complain about DHS Report
DHS “Rightwing Extremism” Document Created During Bush Administration
Operation Vigilant Eagle: Targeting 'White Supremacists' and 'Militia/Sovereign-Citizen Extremists'
Homeland Security Report Upsets Veterans
House Demands Full Disclosure On DHS "Right-wing Extremism" Report
Military Police Document Reveals Integration with Local Law Enforcement
Panel Votes to Investigate ‘Extremism’ Report
Murdoch CEO Labels Bloggers “Political Extremists”
You’re (Probably) a Federal Criminal
N.C. terror arrests spark fears of U.S.-bred extremists
Pentagon's War Against the American People
U.S. enlists citizens in anti-terrorism strategy for 'homegrown' terrorism
$1 Billion in “Stimulus” Money to Hire More Cops
Population “Relocation” Section of FEMA Document Missing
Illinois Army National Guard Puts Military War Machines on the Streets
Obama Considers "Military-civilian" Prison System for Suspected Terrorists
Alleged North Carolina Jihadists to be Tried with Secret Evidence
Operation Overwatch: Palm Beach County, Florida, Holds Mock Terror Drills

Updated 8/3/09 (Newest Additions at End of List)

March 5, 2009

Preparing the U.S. Military for Civil Unrest

Urban Warfare Drills Linked to Coming Economic Rage

By Paul Joseph Watson, Prison Planet
February 23, 2009

Urban warfare training drills are taking place across the country as top analysts, as well as officials, predict a potential “summer of rage” across Europe and America as civil unrest from the economic fallout builds.
Earlier this month, 150 U.S. troops from the U.S. Special Operations Command whizzed around the streets of New Orleans in military helicopters and even dropped bombs in what officials described as a “training event.”

An Iowa National Guard training exercise in Arcadia, Iowa, scheduled for April, was originally billed as an “invasion” before public opposition caused the drill to be scaled back. The exercise included Guard troops patrolling streets, searching houses, and confiscating firearms.

No less than 2,200 U.S. Marines were also involved in urban operations training in Richmond, Virginia, throughout January, drills that involved landing troops in populated areas, allowing military pilots to “familiarize themselves with the area.” Military choppers hovered precariously low over parking lots as citizens were acclimated to seeing active duty military assets engaged in law enforcement style activities.
Are such drills really for the purpose of preparing troops for foreign combat zones? Undoubtedly, but other factors indicate that the drills may very well also be aimed at preparing troops for dealing with mass civil unrest as the economic crisis worsens.

There’s no question that U.S. authorities have been closely observing riots that have toppled governments in Iceland and Latvia and also have threatened to do so in several other European countries. The fact that they have contingency plans in place to deal with such scenarios should they unfold in America cannot be disputed.

Indeed, before a media exposé forced them into a denial, Northcom revealed that one of the duties of at least 20,000 active duty troops that are being placed inside the United States would be dealing with “civil unrest and crowd control.”

Meanwhile, millions of dollars that were set aside as part of the so-called bailout have in fact been handed over to local police departments and spent on military tools like armored vehicles, unmanned aerial surveillance drones, and high-powered firearms for SWAT teams.

In addition, with many predicting that Mexico is on the verge of collapse as a result of the economic crisis and the out-of-control drug war, Texas officials have already established contingency plans to deal with an influx of immigrants, a program that would only address “law enforcement concerns” and not humanitarian needs.

HR 645, otherwise known as the National Emergency Centers Establishment Act, would mandate the expansion of FEMA detention camps which would likely to be used to detain illegal immigrants as well as rioting American citizens.

The prospect of widespread rioting at some stage this year is a scenario feared by many.

Police in the UK are preparing for a “summer of rage” and mass protests against the mishandling of the economic crisis by the government.

The U.S. Army War College in November released a white paper called Known Unknowns: Unconventional ‘Strategic Shocks’ in Defense Strategy Development. The report warned that the military must be prepared for a “violent, strategic dislocation inside the United States,” which could be provoked by “unforeseen economic collapse,” “purposeful domestic resistance,” “pervasive public health emergencies,” or “loss of functioning political and legal order.” The “widespread civil violence,” the document said, “would force the defense establishment to reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic domestic order and human security.”

Numerous other public figures, including Senator Christopher Dodd, leading economist Nouriel Roubini, top trend researcher Gerald Celente, the head of the International Monetary Fund, the head of the World Trade Organization, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, former national security director Zbigniew Brzezinski, and Director of National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair have all warned of coming civil unrest and global instability.

Considering the expectancy for riots, it would be naive to dismiss the notion that the increasing amount of urban warfare drills taking place across the U.S. are not at least partially to prepare troops to undertake law enforcement duties should civil unrest as a consequence of the economic fallout threaten a collapse in social order.

U.S. Army to Buy $6 Million of Riot Equipment
Obama Calls for Mandatory Community Service
Lawmaker Warns of 'Forced Servitude' Under Obama
Democrats Introduce Public National Service Bills
The Future: Military Escalation Abroad and at Home?
Australian Police Will Have Power to Secretly Search Homes
Military May Patrol Bar Zone in Canada
Only 6-12 Months Until Full-Fledged Facsist Martial Law
Blueprints for a Police State
Mexico Sending Extra Troops to Violent Border City
Gates Says U.S. Military Can Help Mexico in Drug War
100,000 Foot Soldiers in Mexican Cartels
Chaos in Mexico: U.S. Military May Help Mexico Fight Drug Cartels
Mexican Crackdown on Cartels Causes Violence in Canada
National Guard Training in Door-to-Door Gun Searches
Canadian Military Prepares for Apocalyptic Hollywood Scenarios
Bodies Stack Up in Mexico's Border Cities from Drug Violence
Popular Rage Grows as Global Crisis Worsens
Canadian Military Readies Reservists for Threats to ‘Domestic Front’
Mock Terrorism Response Exercises in Arizona
Obama Discusses U.S. Military Assistance to Mexico for Drug War
U.S. Army Puts Soldiers on the Street in Alabama in Response to Shootings
Coincidence? German School Gunman Kills 17 After Alabama Shooting
After Attacks, Europe Hurries to Tighten Gun Laws
Washington State Cops Start “Liaison Program” with U.S. Army
Feds, Arizona State Officials to Conduct “Major Disaster Drill” on ASU Campus
Terrorist Watch List Hits 1 Million
Who Benefits from the Destabilization of Mexico?
America's Next Catastrophe is Brewing Just South of Its Borders
Canadian Tories Want to Revive Anti-terror Police Powers
SPP: Updating the Militarization and Annexation of North America
Destabilizing Mexico
AIG Bonuses Add to Potential for Public Revolt against Wall Street, Federal Reserve
Army Reviewing Legality of Sending Troops in to Alabama Town After Gunman Killed 10
Taliban Chief Vows ‘Amazing’ Attack on Washington ‘Soon’
Billings Police Department Gets Military Vehicle to “Fight Crime”
Virginia Military Police Stage Mock Demonstration to Train Soldiers for Protests

Updated 9/4/09 (Newest Additions at End of List)

March 2, 2009

Sidestepping Our Civil Rights

On January 18, 2007, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales was invited to speak to the Senate Judiciary Committee, where he shocked the committee’s ranking member, Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, by stating that there was no guarantee to the right of habeas corpus in the Constitution.



GONZALES: There is no express grant of habeas in the Constitution. There is a prohibition against taking it away.

SPECTER: Now, wait a minute. The Constitution says you can’t take it away, except in the case of rebellion or invasion. Doesn’t that mean you have the right of habeas corpus, unless there is an invasion or rebellion?

Senator Specter was referring to Article One of the Constitution which reads: “The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public safety may require it.” This passage has been historically interpreted to mean that the right of habeas corpus is inherently established.

Blueprints for a Police State

By Marjorie Cohn, Counterpunch
March 4, 2009

Seven newly released memos from the Bush Justice Department reveal a concerted strategy to cloak the President with power to override the Constitution. The memos provide “legal” rationales for the President to:
  • Suspend freedom of speech and press;
  • Order warrantless searches and seizures, including wiretaps of U.S. citizens;
  • Lock up U.S. citizens indefinitely in the United States without criminal charges;
  • Send suspected terrorists to other countries where they will likely be tortured; and
  • Unilaterally abrogate treaties.
According to the reasoning in the memos, Congress has no role to check and balance the executive.

That is the definition of a police state.

Who wrote these memos? All but one were crafted in whole or in part by the infamous John Yoo and Jay Bybee, authors of the so-called “torture memos” that redefined torture much more narrowly than the U.S. definition of torture, and counseled the President how to torture and get away with it. In one memo, Yoo said the Justice Department would not enforce U.S. laws against torture, assault, maiming and stalking, in the detention and interrogation of enemy combatants...

Bush Lawyers Approved Constitution-Free Domestic Military Ops, Docs Say

By Ryan Singel, Wired
March 2, 2009

The Justice Department secretly authorized President George Bush to use the military inside the United States to snoop on, raid and even kill citizens in order to fight terrorism without regard to the Fourth or Fifth Amendment, according to a October 23, 2001 memo released by the Obama Administration Monday.

“We do not think a military commander carrying out a raid on a terrorist cell would be required to demonstrate probable cause or to obtain a warrant,” the Office of Legal Counsel memo (.pdf) said. “We think that the better view is that the Fourth Amendment does not apply to domestic military operations designed to deter and prevent future terrorist attacks.”

Department of Justice special counsel Robert Delahunty and John Yoo, a deputy assistant attorney general best known for penning a memo authorizing government agents to torture suspected terrorists, issued the memo after the administration asked whether it could use the military inside the United States.

Government employees rely on the Office of Legal Counsel’s memos for binding advice as to what activities are and are not legal.

UPDATE: This memo was not officially withdrawn or repudiated until October 6, 2008 — nearly seven years later. In that repudiation memo (.pdf) also made public Monday, Yoo’s replacement Steven Bradbury said the memo should not be “treated as authoritative for any purpose” and that “the Fourth Amendment is fully applicable to domestic military operations.”

American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) attorney Melissa Goodman says that’s why the memos are so disturbing. “The fact we had the OLC in the business of stretching the law to create an outcome and create legal cover for illegal activities is a dangerous thing,” Goodman said. “There is no serious question that the Fourth Amendment applies to U.S. government officials acting on U.S. soil.”

The memo was sent to then White House counsel Alberto Gonzales and the top lawyer for the military William Haynes II.

The memo found that the military could be deployed widely within the United States without being subject to the limits of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Those actions include using the National Security Agency to spy on communications inside the United States without getting court approval — as the Bush Administration admitted it did for years.

“Military action might encompass making arrests, seizing documents or other property, searching persons or places or keeping them under surveillance, intercepting electronic or wireless communications, setting up roadblocks, interviewing witnesses and searching for suspects,” the duo wrote.

The memo is just one of nine previously unreleased memos that outside groups like the ACLU have been trying to make public. The most recent, dated January 15, 2009 — one of the last days of the Bush Administration — anticipates the release of the memo and attempts to distance the last inhabitants of the OLC from the earlier ones (.pdf). The other memos largely focus on the legality of torture.

Administration Asserts No Fourth Amendment for Domestic Military Operations
Secret DOJ Memo Says Fourth Amendment Has “No Application” After 9/11
AG Office of Legal Counsel Authorized Pentagon to Ignore Bill of Rights
Yoo Torture Memo Says Fourth Amendment Doesn't Apply in War on Terror
White House Asked DOJ How Bush Could Sidestep Fourth Amendment
Bush and Lincoln Both Suspended Habeas Corpus
Smart Grid: Government Spying Targets Rural America
Gingrich: Not All Speech is Permitted Under the Constitution
YouTube’s Parent Google is a Corporate Member of the Council on Foreign Relations
Obama seeks to overturn right to counsel before questioning
Government Critics to be Sent to Mental Asylums?
‘They stole my little girl,’ says mother judged too stupid to care for her baby
Mother of Tasered man wants Poland to probe son’s death
Lawmakers Back Broader Use of Full-Body Scanning Equipment
Would YOU be happy to take the ‘naked’ body scan?
New US Airport Security Measures Include "Thorough" Pat-Down Searches
Vast 20,000-strong snooper army of town hall bureaucrats get power to enter your home without a warrant
Another false flag terror attack as justification for war and trampling on our freedoms
Calls for Full-Body Screening Devices Grow After Terror Attempt
New York Governor Orders National Guard to Airports
Get Naked to Defeat Terrorists
Body scanners break child porn laws
The Next Stage: Global Naked Body Scanners
Newborn taken by CPS for his political affiliation with the Oath Keepers

Updated 10/11/10 (Newest Additions at End of List)

Go to The Lamb Slain Home Page