The Banksters' Plan to Rule the World
There is an evil which I have seen under the sun, and it is common among men: a man to whom God hath given riches, wealth, and honour, so that he wanteth nothing for his soul of all that he desireth, yet God giveth him not power to eat thereof, but a stranger eateth it: this is vanity, and it is an evil disease. - Ecclesiastes 6:1-2Almost every nation has a central bank. The bank does three things: (1) it supplies the government with funds at low interest rates; (2) it limits the expansion of money by the commercial banks; (3) it bails out the largest banks when a banking crisis hits. It officially promotes the first two goals. It does not talk about the third. - Gary North, Taxpayers In Revolt, State Bankster System In Europe Is Collapsing, Next Stop USA, Market Oracle, November 9, 2011
Can America Stop the Coming Oppression?
By J. Hapiak, People for FreedomDecember 1, 2009
Could Climategate Unravel the UN’s Plan to Rule the World?
In a matter of days, President Obama will write a brand new chapter in American history, one that fulfils the promise of change that the Americans asked for, but not necessarily the change that they hoped for. What I am speaking about is the Copenhagen Climate Treaty that President Obama had promised to sign around December 9, 2009, that could forever surrender American sovereignty.
Now with the emergence of Climategate as reported all over the internet, and Senator Inhofe’s calling for an investigation into that matter, which implies that the top UN climate scientists had cooked the science of climate change for profit . . . the signing of this document has been supposedly postponed, but the President still has plans to make the trip to Copenhagen anyhow.
Will President Obama sign this treaty behind closed doors despite the allegations that Climate Change may be a fraud? Will he sign it like President George W. Bush signed the Security and Prosperity Partnership* (SPP) in Ottawa, in secret? No one knows for sure.
The mainstream media isn’t saying much about anything, and they certainly aren’t warning the American people that this treaty is less about the climate and more about establishing an international carbon tax and finalizing the framework for a new layer of government, one that is international in scope and whose “rules of law” will govern the conduct of all UN member nations. What else they aren’t saying is that there will be no pulling back out of this agreement without the unanimous consent of every UN member nation.
This movement has been fueled for many decades, but it went virtually unnoticed until 1991 when George H. W. Bush announced to Congress the coming of a New World Order, the first steps to setting up a global community and changing the way America conducts its business forever. A few months later on February 1, 1992, he made another speech to the United Nations General Assembly, and stated:
“It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance.”Ever since making this declaration, every other elected President has endorsed the same allegiance to the United Nations without the consent of the American people or Congress.
The United Nations
Since its inception, the UN has demonstrated a long train of abuses against all member and non-member nations alike, which suggests that once they are in charge, the possibility is there that they can and will exploit any government they choose by pressuring them to sponsor their cause, not by freedom of choice, but through coercion. With most of the G20 nation heads still promising to sign this climate treaty, the UN and the international banking system, according to some, will be able to finally establish themselves as the supreme authority, second to no other government in the world.
America was born on the principle that promised our nation would always remain free and independent. It was hopeful that all other nations would adopt the same principles. But throughout history, there has always been an underlying desire by a select few to control the world, and some of these individuals have found that if they can control the issuance of fractional currency and lend it out with interest, in time, they can burden whole nations with accumulated debt and could actually get political leaders to wager collateral in exchange for the money they need to keep their nations economy afloat.
Debt and a nation's continuous need for more money gave international bankers an easy way to pressure our government into signing agreements like NAFTA, the WTO, Agenda 21, Codex Alimentarious, Universal Health Care in exchange for a loan. What wasn’t known by the American people then is certainly well known now, that these agreements have forced all nations to incrementally transfer – directly into the hands of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank - control of their:
- Assets like property, rivers, lakes, natural resources; and
- The power over trade, agriculture, manufacturing, cyber security, media communication, healthcare, military, gold reserves, politicians and even the rights of its people.
What is planned next is most likely the consolidation of all central banks in the world and placing them under the control of the UN and the IMF / Bank of the World. According to the draft agenda of London’s G20 Summit held in March 2009, they have already started the process of making these changes. The Copenhagen Climate Treaty could likely be one instrument they need to make that transformation complete and permanent.
Who Controls the Money Controls Everything
Thomas Jefferson warned the Congress about this very problem and, in one quote, he implied that the lenders are more menacing to our freedoms than a standing army. And that’s why our founding fathers were adamant that the United States issue their own “interest free” currency, and the reason is clear - so America would never become a slave to debt or to the lenders. Yet that all changed in 1913, when the Senate ratified, with minimal debate or opposition, the creation of the privately owned Federal Reserve System, with a 2/3 majority vote during the Christmas vacation, and after the Senate had already broke for the Holiday.
Many opponents felt that the New York bankers Morgan and Rockefeller and also Paul Warburg, who was directly connected to the Bank of England, duped the United States. Soon after the Federal Reserve System was formed, officials from the Bank of England were quick to establish the League of Nations, which in 1945 became the United Nations. They were also connected to forming the International Money Fund (IMF) in 1944.
Chartered in 1694, the privately-owned Bank of England happens to be the same banking cartel that pressured King George III to pay back his European war debt. By 1742, the Parliament passed the British Resumption Act that required all taxes and debts be paid in gold. In order for the King to pay just the interest on his debt to the Bank of England, he imposed huge taxes on the American colonies and required them to pay in gold as well.
With shortages of gold in the colonies, this change caused a long term depression, so the colonies began experimenting with different types of currencies and eventually settled on a fiat currency, called Colonial Scrip, which brought about a new age of prosperity. When officials from the Bank of England learned about their newfound wealth, they questioned Benjamin Franklin and discovered that the colonies learned the benefits of issuing their own currency and how currency works. As a result, the Currency Act of 1764 was quickly passed, thus prohibiting the Colonial officials from issuing their own currency. This made Colonial Scrip worthless and again drove the colonies back into a depression.
The oppressive laws of the King along with the depression that was caused by the Bank of England . . . eventually led the Colonialists to declare independence from England and their European bankers. Soon afterwards, England attacked the Colonies and the Revolutionary War began . . . But it didn’t end there. That battle for power still goes on today.
In March of 2009, President Obama attended the G20 summit meeting in London. According to the G20 draft agenda, they discussed the Coordination of International Regulation which, in effect, places the control of the Federal Reserve System, Securities and Exchange Commission, the collateral that the institution controls, and the entire American economy under the control of Europe’s IMF / Bank of the World. The IMF is rooted directly to the same group of lenders that the Colonies fought off 250 years before.
How the UN Retains Control of the Nations
The UN/IMF has accomplished many tasks that they set forth by using agreements and treaties like the WTO and Agenda 21 to control all manufacturing and agricultural output throughout the world. The treaties and agreements encourage international trade instead of supporting local trade, thus profiting no one except for the corporate leaders and also the banking elite who control the financial institutions and lend money to the large corporations and governments at interest.
The UN/IMF seeks dominion by controlling the elements of power that naturally propel a nation forward. Don’t be fooled, the ideology of the World Trade Organization is not about creating an environment that encourages new competition and business growth locally, but rather it is an engineered plan to stop small business growth and to create international duopolies and monopolies formed from business mergers and consolidation that can be easily controlled by the international bankers.
Instead of new competition growing out of invention, the international treaties and agreements are inhibiting this growth by distancing the very supply lines that are needed locally by the entrepreneurs who possess the new ideas and can build the new companies. As a result, today’s entrepreneurs cannot easily obtain access to the raw materials, supplies, engineers, skilled trades people, or the machines that they need to develop new products without traveling abroad to foreign lands and making huge investments that often involve banks and foreign partnerships. This means new competition can never grow like it once did in America from the kitchen table to a garage, shop or factory without a huge input of borrowed cash, thus slowing down the invention process and stopping manufacturing growth forever.
For over 200 years the strong and powerful American market was protected by tariffs and quotas. When the American economy slowed, tariffs were artificially raised by the government in order to increase the price of foreign imports. This helped to keep American manufacturing competitive locally, while stimulating manufacturing and protecting jobs at the same time. Foreign countries that wanted to sell their products in the huge American market had two choices:
- Either pay the tariffs to America, or
- Pay the workers in their country more money so they could afford to buy the American-made products.
The Change of Ideology
The progressive NAFTA and the WTO agreements turned the old protectionist way that America traded, inside out. Under this new international rule of law, the UN is now in control of American trade and enforces it by penalizing the United States with trade sanctions, fines and other deterrents every single time that America tries to collect tariffs or set quotas on imports, or tries to pre-qualify our trading partners with certain rules. The UN/WTO agreement allows most UN member nations to flood the American market with cheap imports, which only undermines American manufacturing and the middle class at its core.
No comments:
Post a Comment