Conspiracy Theory With Jesse Ventura: Global Warming
Premiered on truTV, Wednesday, December 16, 2009
"Whether global warming is real or not, it's believed some people are using the issue to make billions of dollars, start a one-world government and control our lives, from the cars we drive to the foods we eat. Jesse Ventura starts with Al Gore and goes far beyond as he uncovers the evidence that leads to one man thought to be behind the global warming conspiracy."
December 10, 2009
After an annual meeting of the Bilderberg Club in May 2009, the establishment of the global management system of institutions seemed to have been given a boost, repeating the plots of American apocalypitc blockbusters.
As soon as the financial top had opted for a lingering crisis, global managers were instructed to work in two major ways:
- Invent a myth about the danger of swine flu pandemic in order to take control of the national healthcare systems and reorganize the World Health Organization (WHO) into a global healthcare ministry; and
- Impose a threat of global warming to gain control of world natural resources and introduce a unified 'green' tax [alongside with creation of a new sub-national managing body -- an international ministry of ecology].
The implementation of the first scenario suggested by the Bilderberg Club is currently underway.
After the WHO announced the A/H1N1 pandemic on July 11, 2009, a real hysteria was launched in mass media worldwide, and people were told to get prepared for the pandemic in November and undergo vaccination [in 2005 the WHO added an amendment to its Charter, which says that during a pandemic the organization does not recommend but gives instructions and orders, and the number of vaccines should be no less than 4.6 billion].Now we are witnessing another show titled “The UN Copenhagen climate change conference,” currently held in the Danish capital [it will run through December 18] and aiming to work out a document to limit global emissions and replace the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012. Thirty thousand participants, including 60 heads of states and prime ministers, have arrived there on December 7.
The operation reached its peak when in late September Barack Obama signed a decree to impose 'a flu pandemic sanitary emergency,' which means that the citizens could be vaccinated against their will and kept in special quarantine zones. Amid panic, Americans and West Europeans were involved in mass immunization, which unveiled that the pandemic had been paid in order to let pharmaceutical companies thrive on it, and also as a weapon against 'unwanted' population (and now we all know what a swine flu vaccine is). It was also used as a so-called 'innovative' mechanism of handling political processes -- which was so actively used in Ukraine.
In view of this, the WHO gained extra powers and strengthened its status.
The EU, being one of the major organizers of the summit, had elected its first President, who was immediately described in the media as a creature of the Bilderberg club: On November, 15, a few days before his appointment, Herman Van Rompuy met with the club's top managers at Val Duchesse castle outside Brussels, where he spoke about the need to revise the mechanism of the EU's financing and suggested a unified 'green' tax which would go directly to Brussels. The fact that the issue was covered in the media proves that members of the Bilderberg Club are no longer going to conceal that they are the real bosses in Europe.
Such confidence annoyed some of the European Parliament members. One of them, an Italian Mario Borghezio, said:
“All three candidates (for the role of the EU president) often attended meetings at the Bilderberg club, and I think that they should explain whether they are honest candidates representing their native country or just members of secret groups which had been organized to discuss pressing social and other kinds of issues.”Another MP, an Englishman Nigel Farage, criticized Rompuy's appointment and called him a 'puppet-leader' in the hands of Barroso. He even dared to say that the EU is an authoritarian dictatorship ruled by bureaucracy which is not elected by anybody. Commenting on the Lisbon Treaty, Farage told the delegates:
“It took you 8.5 years of intimidation, lying and disrespect towards democratic referendums to lobby this deal!”Immediately after his appointment as the EU President, Van Rompuy [known in Europe as 'master of compromising'] assured his patrons that he perfectly understood all the tasks he was facing. Speaking at a press-conference, Herman Van Rompuy said that 2009 has become the 'first year of global management' [he meant the G20], while the Climate Summit in Copenhagen is a next step in this direction.'
The Danish government carried out a reshuffle and appointed Lykke Friis, pro-dean at the Copenhagen University, as Climate Minister to replace Connie Hedegaard, a member of the Bilderberg Club. The latter swapped her title to First Commissioner on the EU Climate, which was introduced in October 2009 especially in order to control the reduction of CO2 emissions 20 per cent by the year 2020. Hedegaard is a member of numerous committees and organizations, including the Danish Atlantic Treaty Association led by Robert Gunther.
What goals are being pursued in Copenhagen this time?
Lord Christopher Monckton, former adviser to Margaret Thatcher, explained:
“When I read this treaty I see that the authors are talking about the establishment of 'one world Marxist government.' The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to third world countries, in satisfaction of what is called, coyly, ‘climate debt’ -- because we’ve been burning CO2 and they haven’t. We’ve been screwing up the climate and they haven’t. And the third purpose of this new entity, this government, is enforcement,” Monckton warned.He then noted that the new treaty would be supported by most of the third world countries 'as they think they will receive money for it.' And the US President will sign it without expecting two thirds of the Senate and the Congress to ratify it.
And the 'world government' would be empowered to interfere in other countries' economic and ecological policies, and the 'enforcement' -- these all are just mechanisms to 'transfer resources,' which actually means reforming economies of the non-western countries with the use of progressive technologies in order to gain control of these resources [within that level of consumption permitted in the West] that would guarantee a drop in the planet's population.
It is no secret that the 1992 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change was adopted after the idea of global warming, resulting from anthropogenic factors, had been promoted among scientists.
In 1997 the Kyoto Protocol was presented as an international agreement linked to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The Protocol sets binding targets for 37 industrialized countries and the European community for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. These amount to an average of five per cent against 1990 levels over the five-year period 2008-2012. The US, being the world's biggest emitter of greenhouse gases, has not ratified the Protocol. The EU (now comprising the Baltic States and the countries of Eastern Europe) took the burden of the responsibility to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 8%, Japan and Canada by 6%. The Protocol limits emission in Russia and Ukraine to a percentage increase or decrease from their 1990 levels. The developing countries, including China and India were not included in numerical limitation of the Kyoto Protocol.
However, the implementation of the Kyoto deal failed to help in resolving environmental problems but added a new commodity to the international market: quota on GHG. It turned into a pure speculation and let the financial capital grasp onto a vital energy sector in the developing countries. Due to their imperfect industrial policies, the developed states could not succeed in modernization and GHG reducing. That is why they found another means to fulfill their obligations: a developed state helps a developing one to reduce emissions and then counts the limited tons of GHG as if those were reduce on its territory.
Very soon hundreds of companies and foundations joined this 'green' quota games hoping to thrive on it.
In the long run, the international environmental market received the strongest expansion ever, and originally there were only three purchasers: the World Bank, the governments of the Netherlands and Japan. Now their number has increased sharply, and professional speculators now make up to 40% of the participants in hydrocarbon exchanges.
Having accepted the conditions, Russia later faced an ambiguous situation: the country has large stocks of free greenhouse gases, but this is because in the 1990s its industry was in severe crisis, and all emissions then even fell below 30%.
The international community plans to introduce new emission quotas to restrict industrial development and impose western environmental standards that require implementation of very costly projects [and these expenses will never be compensated by the sums earned on 'green' quotas trading]. And taking into consideration that climate in Russia requires constant expenditures on energy, the country will hardly be able to restore its industrial power.
A group of developed nations have prepared a brand new document especially for the Copenhagen summit. The document says that the divison into developed and developing nations has long become outdated, while today all the states should be obliged to cut GHG emissions and provide assistance to the poorest countries. The treaty is expected to be legally binding as well so that the states approved new rules at the governmental level. But the differences between the participants were so great that they only managed to agree on a road map plan without discussing the figures.
However, high promises of financial and investment assisstance proved to be more effective than legal mechanisms, and ahead of the summit the leading developing nations followed in the West's footsteps and pledged GHG emissions cuts by 2020. The EU announced a 20% reduction from the 1990 level, while the US said it will reduce its emissions by 17% from the 2005 level [in accordance with a draft law approved by the House of Representatives]. India claimed it wil reduce 20-25%, whiel South Korea and China announced the figures of 30% and 40-45% respectively.
Russian WWF, Greenpeace and Ecoprotection activists said:
“Russia should play the leading role at the talks. We can and should remain at the 1990 level of 30%. And then we shoud proceed with further reduction.”At the Russa-EU summit in November, Dmitry Medvedev said the country would try to reduce its GHG emissions up to 25% by 2020 and added that, by 2050, Russia will be ready to cut emission by no less than 50% in comparison to the 1990 level.
This kind of unanimity hides the real differences between the participants of the summit and the gravity of environmental problems, and it adds fuel to the fire caused by the idea of 'catastrophic global warming.' Recently, the Prince of Wales Charles delivered a report in which he said:
“Nations have less than 100 months to act to save the planet from irreversible damage due to climate change.”Global management does everything to hide the real state of affairs. It ignores information and scientific research from alternative sources, especially if the threat of global warming and its anthropogenic factors are being argued [mind the recent leakage of e-mails from the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research, the so-called 'climategate'].
In the past 20 years, a powerful system of ecological 'brainwashing' has been created, which serves the participants in 'green' business who can thus control the Earth's natural resources. But in their attempts to keep the world's population deluded, global speculators and their servants among politicians have long surpassed reasonable limits.
I remember an old Russian proverb: the devil is scary when you cannot see him, but when you do, he makes you laugh.
Translated from the Russian original by the Strategic Cultural Foundation