People Are Waking Up to the Great Deception (Featured Stories)

The Green Religion and Population Control

Too many bodies and not enough resources to sustain us -- that's what many scientists are saying in terms of global warming and how we must curb the fallout. Human vs. animal populations are now on the chopping block. Which one do you think should be pushed aside so we can save the planet? [Editor's Note: Plants absorb CO2 and emit oxygen as a waste product; humans and animals breathe oxygen and emit CO2 as a waste product -- the global warming alarmists believe that in order to save the trees ('Mother Earth'), we must reduce human and animal populations. In other words, only a select few should be allowed to live.] - Humans vs Animals -- To Reduce Global Warming, Which One Needs to Go, Bob Kurz, December 22, 2009

Targets of the Illuminati and the Committe of 300: to cause by means of limited wars in the advanced countries, by means of starvation and diseases in the Third World countries, the death of three billion people by the year 2050, people they call "useless eaters." The Committee of 300 (Illuminati) commissioned Cyrus Vance to write a paper on this subject of how to bring about such genocide. The paper was produced under the title "Global 2000 Report" and was accepted and approved for action by former President James Earl Carter and Edwin Muskie, then Secretary of States, for and on behalf of the US Government. Under the terms of the "Global 2000 Report," the population of the US is to be reduced by 100 million by the year 2050. - Targets of the Illuminati and the Committee of 300, Dr. John Coleman, 1991

The Green Religion

By Gary Stearman

Today, Christians are watching intently as the world rapidly turns in a direction that is increasingly and strangely alien to their way of thinking. The Apostle Paul had it right. He foresaw a day when men would worship the creation more than its Creator.

In the last few decades, a competing system of thought has become a powerful medium of change. It has all but overthrown the idea of a providential God, and has adopted a new form of religion, centered about ecological preservation. It sees human beings, not God, as the most powerful force in the world. Their behavior is seen as out of control and threatening in the most fundamental way. Their numbers, their use of polluting chemicals, waste-water and food threaten the earth. They are viewed as "ecologically illiterate."

By contrast, Christians view the world as the product of a Creator-God, who not only originated a living system, but continues to oversee it. At a certain time, He will favor it with an ultimate set of outcomes, both of judgment and blessing. Concerning the earth, we believe that its history has … and its future will … unfold according to His pattern.

This is the model that emerges from our faith, and it produces a certain way of thinking. We believe that this planet has been handed over to the stewardship of man. He has been given the prerogative of managing its systems for a certain period of time:

"So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

"And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth" (Genesis 1:27-28).

At the end of that time, the Lord will judge this world and its systems. The prophets speak of a tumultuous future period. This "day of the Lord" will radically remake the world, producing a favorable environment and perfect meteorological conditions for the Kingdom Age.

For us, this is an article of faith. For the thinker outside this faith, there is only fear and trembling, as he watches a burgeoning population, decreasing resources and destabilizing meteorology. He feels alone at the edge of a vast galaxy, isolated on a tiny ball, whose ecology he sees as perilously close to collapse — meaning the end of humanity.

On the other hand, the Christian way of thinking accepts the classic model of science, in which its theories and methodologies of its conceptual framework attribute reality to the hand of God. Science has come to speak of a certain pattern of thinking, such as this one, as a "paradigm." This term generally refers to a template that describes the way everyday reality is viewed.

Christians see the Lord as the innermost force of creation:

"God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets,

"Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;

"Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high" (Hebrews 1:1-3).

These, the opening verses of the epistle to the Hebrews, clearly state that the Son — Jesus — is both Creator and Heir of all that we see. Furthermore, He holds the Creation together. His will is the primary factor of everything we call "reality."

And People Laugh at Bible Prophecy!

Secular minds tend to view humanity as an invading pestilence, crawling on the earth’s surface. Pundits and professors write that man is ultimately self-destructive and must be controlled before he reaches the point of catastrophic collapse.

An excellent example of this sort of thought can be found in a book written over forty years ago by Dr. Paul Ehrlich. In 1968, this professor of biological sciences at Stanford University wrote an influential book, entitled, The Population Bomb.

In the book, he authoritatively predicted that humanity was on the verge of a colossal downfall, perhaps within the next decade. At that time, using demographic observations and estimates of available food and water, he predicted that humanity was about to implode. He envisioned three possible scenarios. All three end in chaos...

In Ehrlich’s vision of the near future, people die by the millions. Then international authorities come up with a population control plan.

"The plan is to be initiated in 1985, when it is calculated that the major die-back will be over, using famine relief distribution stations as bases for both facilities and personnel. The plan will eventually cover the entire world and is programmed with a goal of a total world population of two billion in 2025 and 1.5 billion in 2100." (The Population Bomb, pp. 72-79)

The above speculations seem childish in the extreme, yet Ehrlich is lauded, while people laugh at Bible prophecy! He and others of his school of thought worship at the altar of the world system with a deep sense of dread. Nevertheless, academic leaders and government authorities followed Ehrlich’s lead and went on to predict dire famine and pestilence for the concluding decades of the twentieth century. They actually take him seriously.

But take note … the world is now heading toward a population of seven billion, and doing quite well. Ehrlich thought that two billion people were too many.

In the years following the release of his book, there were local famines, some quite serious, but global upheaval and deaths in the hundreds of millions never came. In retrospect, Dr. Ehrlich was trying to stir up a crisis that would create a mandate for change. Secular authorities constantly operate in this way: management by crisis creates the opportunity for control.

Green Politics

For him, the answer lay in social collapse, followed by rigorous, authoritarian control of global society to control population and fairly distribute the produce of the world economy. His approach now seems naïve and quaint, both in its predictions and its solutions to an imagined set of problems.

But others have followed him, evolving their own answer to the world’s burgeoning population. From their thinking has emerged a new paradigm. It is commonly known as the "green revolution."

Dr. Fritjof Capra, founder and director of the Center for Ecoliteracy in Berkeley, California, is perhaps the leading theoretician in this field of study. In 1984, he co-authored a book, entitled Green Politics.

In it, and in other publications since, he has advanced a new paradigm, or model, for the stabilization of planet earth, which he sees as threatened by human destruction. He is consistently critical of the "old science," which teaches that global ecology can be understood by studying its individual parts … biology, chemistry, the physics of weather, and so on.

Instead, he advances a theory in which the earth is a "living system," which must be understood as an integrated ecology. He foresees a new science centered around "ecological literacy."

It is this area of knowledge that he envisions as the salvation of planet earth. Put simply, he believes that man’s destruction of the planet (through man-caused global warming or excess production of carbon dioxide) can only be stopped when humanity has risen to an acceptable level of ecological literacy.

Many now believe that perceiving the world in this way offers mankind’s only hope of survival. Al Gore’s documentary, "An Inconvenient Truth," is the direct outgrowth of Capra’s thinking.

Gore’s ideas of man-made global warming and the proposed cap-and-trade taxation of carbon are the direct result of the new "eco-literacy." The public school systems of the world are now being flooded with the new thought, called "post-modern thought," which distrusts classical education.

One leading thinker — Dr. David W. Orr, the Paul Sears Distinguished Professor of Environmental Studies and Politics at Oberlin College — teaches that we must recognize that modern culture is not ecologically sustainable. Man’s behavior threatens all life on planet earth. He proposes that civic morality must be based upon Ecological Literacy, the title of his recent book. As a perfect model of post-modern thought, he proposes tailoring all education to this end.

He writes that he is concerned about "the role education must play in the journey to a post-modern world:"

"Education in the modern world was designed to further the conquest of nature and the industrialization of the planet. It tended to produce unbalanced, under-dimensioned people tailored to fit the modern economy. Post-modern education must have a different agenda, one designed to heal, connect, liberate, empower, create, and celebrate. Post-modern education must be life-centered."

His writing makes it increasingly obvious that "life-centered" means what we would think of as the worship of life, itself, not God as the Creator of that life. It is nothing less than a new religion.

It is just as Paul wrote:

"Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

"Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,

"And changed the glory of the un-corruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and four-footed beasts, and creeping things.

"Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonor their own bodies between themselves:

"Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen" (Romans 1:21-25).

To the worshipers of ecology, evolution is god, and the greening of the earth is their worship.

Canadian Newspaper Calls for Malthusian Global Population Reduction Policy

By Kurt Nimmo, Infowars
December 10, 2009

Diane Francis, writing for Canada’s Financial Post, begins an editorial by declaring a myth — the world is over-populated.

“The ‘inconvenient truth’ overhanging the UN’s Copenhagen conference is not that the climate is warming or cooling, but that humans are overpopulating the world,” she writes. “A planetary law, such as China’s one-child policy, is the only way to reverse the disastrous global birthrate currently, which is one million births every four days.”

An interesting choice of words. Planetary law. In other words, a world government with the power to decide if humans are allowed to procreate.

China’s brutal totalitarian rulers base their Malthusian depopulation program on Mao Zedong’s reading of Marxist theory on population growth, an idea Marx took from Thomas Malthus.

Currently we do not have such a world government. Behind the scenes at Copenhagen, however, the powerbrokers are working feverishly to establish the sort of world government only partially imagined by Ms. Francis.

The elite realized a big victory when they anointed the Bilderberg and Trilateral commission member Herman Van Rompuy as the “permanent” (and unelected) president of the European Union. Van Rompuy declared 2009 the “first year of global governance” and said Copenhagen is “another step towards the global management of our planet.”

It is also interesting that Francis cited China’s notorious one-child policy as the desired template. The totalitarian rulers of China have enforced a one-child policy since 1979. It is modern eugenics in practice.

“China currently has Galton-era eugenics laws on the books which only allow pre-approved couples to marry and have children,” writes Daniel Taylor. “The Law of the People’s Republic of China on Maternal and Infant Health Care states that if the approved couples children are deemed to be inferior they are to be terminated.”

China’s draconian eugenics program is supported by the Rockefellers, a clan of infamous eugenicists. The Washington Post reported on October 12, 2000 that the Rockefeller Foundation had donated two million dollars to upgrade a Chinese drug factory that produces the abortion drug RU-486.

“RU-486 has been a key ingredient in China’s population control strategy for years. Of the estimated 10 million abortions performed annually in China, about half are carried out with RU-486, said Gao Ersheng, director of the Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research,” the CIA’s favorite newspaper reported...

Population Reduction: Who Will Make It and Who Won’t?

Fausty’s Libertarian Blog
November 24, 2009

This is no conspiracy theory.

Mark Wallace posted on his blog, Conservative Home, a rather chilling article and accompanying spreadsheet on the population figures that the Optimum Population Trust would like to see in each country of the world.

Mark’s article:

The Optimum Population Trust, for those of you who haven’t yet come across them, are an odd bunch. Bluntly, they believe the best way to save the planet is to get rid of as many human beings as possible.
On the plus side, at least they are being more honest than most greens in their open contempt for human beings. The reality of many in the environmentalist movement is at core a deep anti-humanism, an arrogant dislike for people who are somehow too stupid to see the problem with their pursuit of a happy life and a healthy family.
On the down side, the OPT’s aims are actually pretty worrying – verging on sinister, even. Buried in their website is a detailed spreadsheet [Excel link] laying out their ideal “sustainable” populations for each country. And those “ideal” populations are a little worrying, if you try to imagine the reality of them.
For example, the UK should shrink to 29 million people, from the 60 million we currently have. We are of course a small island, but ask yourself which half of your friends you would rather did not exist?

And we get things comparatively easy in the OPT’s dystopian vision of the future: Only one in six of the current Algerian population should really be allowed; Bosnians are unlikely to be overjoyed that 3 million of their 4 million people are, in the OPT’s eyes, an inconvenience; Rwanda should apparently go from 7 million people to only 2 million.

What the OPT seem to forget is that these aren’t just statistics. They aren’t just “emitters,” as their website terms them. They are real human beings who live, love and laugh. It is peculiar that Sir David Attenborough, the Patron of the Trust, can show so much compassion for animals but is apparently happy to back such a dispassionate dismissal of the value of our fellow humans.

Yesterday, the OPT released the results of a Yougov opinion poll [Excel link] which they trumpeted as showing public support for their aims. “Public want smaller UK population,” announces their website. However, when you actually read the tables for the polling results, it turns out that the public are bothered about far more real world, centre right issues than greenie pipe dreams...

Overpopulation Action Network & Forum (Supports Optimum Population Trust)

MISSION

The role of the Forum is to raise awareness about overpopulation and give its members a chance to examine and discuss the issue of overpopulation with the aid of expert advisors. It seeks to create a global platform for change, via a action network that fosters human solidarity to actively campaign against overpopulation.

THE PROBLEM - BASIC FACTS

"World population is projected to rise from today's 6.8 billion to 9.2 billion by 2050. The World Population Clock is ticking. We are rapidly destabilising our climate and destroying the natural world on which we depend for future life" (source OPT). In 1900, global population stood at about 1.6 billion. By 2000, those digits had reversed: Global population was 6.1 billion. Thus ended the most remarkable century in demographic history. After thousands of years in which the world’s population size fluctuated, with minimal long-term growth, world population increased nearly four-fold in 100 years. -Population Bulletin Vol. 60, No. 4 2005

Nearly 80 million people are added to the earth's population each year. And almost 1.5 billion people are between 10 and 25 years old. Almost half of young people live in poverty. Persistent poverty and rapid population growth tend to go hand-in-hand.

While Africa is the fastest-growing region, Asia’s huge population size—it is home to 60 percent of world population in 2005—means that most of the people added to the world between 2005 and 2050 will be Asians. India alone is projected to add more people than the combined total for the Americas (Population Bulletin Vol. 60, No. 4 2005).

"Half the world's people now live in countries where water tables are falling. This includes the big three grain producers—China, India, and the United States—which account for nearly one half of the world grain harvest" (Lester Brown, Worldwatch Institute).

It is now overwhelmingly clear that at the root of climate change, energy shortages, increasing environmental destruction/pollution, water and food shortages, animal species extinction, unemployment and civil unrest is OVERPOPULATION, as well as over-consumption especially of fossil fuels. So tackling climate change without tackling population growth is simply not tackling the problem!

THE SOLUTION

Therefore the most effective way we can combat climate change is not just through adopting a green and low carbon impact lifestyle, reducing our consumption levels and changing from fossil fuels to cleaner energies, but by reducing the birth rate. Given the gravity of the situation, perhaps we should ideally aim for ONE child; or better still, consider adoption.

Besides lobbying our politicians, backing family planning charities and organisations, we must actively take action, and seek to publicize the problem.

Of course bringing together different cultures with different traditions and educational backgrounds, each interpreting rights in a different way is not an easy task. Nevertheless by speaking with as many people from as many different countries as possible we will start to break down cultural barriers and tabus, and raise public awareness to the URGENCY of the problem. After all cultures influence and are influenced by external circumstances and change in response.
The primary role of the Forum is therefore to foster dialogue between people from different countries, to inform people of the reality, create a network of ambassadors for the future, and campaign against overpopulation.

The Forum aims to provide regular information and updates based on accurate academic research and data.

By signing up to THE OVERPOPULATION FORUM you are actively helping to be part of the solution rather than the problem.

The forum supports the Optimum Population Trust, the leading charity campaigning on this issue whose better-known patrons are none other than Sir David Attenborough CVO CBE, Naturalist, broadcaster and trustee of the British Museum and Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew; and a former controller of BBC Two, and Jonathon Porritt CBE, Founder Director of Forum for the Future and Chairman of the UK Sustainable Development Commission.

Ask yourself the following:

Should any single organism or animal arrive at destabilizing its own climate, putting potentially at risk all other forms of life?

Surely if it reaches the point of having to plunder the land and resources not only of its neighbours, but of other species, pushing many to the brink of extinction, then it is no longer in harmony with the surrounding environment and has exceeded its carrying capacity.

In the natural world, species growth ends in either a stable homeostasis with the environment, or in collapse. "Sustainable growth" is a nice idea, like "perpetual motion," but equally impossible in the physical world (Prof. Bartlett).

We are currently on a collision course with the planet itself, as we have not payed sufficient attention to the fact that many of the planet's resources are finite.

USA roundtable of population organizations calling for change (June 08)