tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-954029713422850507.post9038140093908251908..comments2024-01-03T03:37:50.185-05:00Comments on People Are Waking Up to the Great Deception (Featured Stories): Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-954029713422850507.post-9838780965141710832016-10-31T10:53:39.010-04:002016-10-31T10:53:39.010-04:00From "The Top 100 Most Damaging Wikileaks&quo...From "The Top 100 Most Damaging Wikileaks":<br /><br />34. Democrats using American lobbyists to money launder foreign donations illegally<br /><br /> https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11915<br /><br /> “Take the money!! We're consistently flagging more FARA registrants daily. In terms of # - we're at 27 out of 370 prospective bundlers - but to Jesse's question - that does not represent the costs of how much these folks would likely raise. If we were looking at these folks below on a case by case basis, I'd want to specifically raise: Tony Podesta (Iraq, Azerbaijan, Egypt), Ben Barnes (Libya), John Merrigan (UAE), Wyeth Weidman (Libya), and Mike Driver (UAE connections)...Wyeth Wiedeman Ben Barnes Group National Board for the Following Up and Recovering of the Libyan Looted and Disguised Funds of the Transitional Government of Libya, through Washington African Consulting Group, Inc (12/3/14 - Current)."<br /><br /> Very clear intent to break campaign finance laws. We also once again see Clinton's team say, "Take the money!!" They thought they wouldn't get caught.<br /><br /> This picture describes it.<br /><br /><br />35. The New York Times colluding with Hillary, allowed quote edits<br /><br /> https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4213<br /><br /> https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1181<br /><br /> “Margaret, far be it from me what the public editor of the NY Times should focus on, but…”<br /><br /> "These exchanges were pretty interesting ... would love the option to use… I wanted the option to use all — and you could veto what you didn't want."<br /><br /> The Clinton campaign vetoed essentially the entire interview, but even in the portions they did allow for publication, they had Mark Leibovich edit out a mention of Sarah Palin, at Hillary’s personal request.<br /><br /> There are multiple times the NYT has been colluding with Hillary in these leaks, including the fake smears.<br /><br /> This was the article.<br /><br />http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/<br />magiclougiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07781500694246403783noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-954029713422850507.post-81596173997555234112016-10-31T10:53:19.338-04:002016-10-31T10:53:19.338-04:00From "The Top 100 Most Damaging Wikileaks&quo...From "The Top 100 Most Damaging Wikileaks":<br /><br />32. Referring to a “Shadow Government” that protects Hillary (FBI docs)<br /><br /> https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09STATE89125_a.html<br /><br /> https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton/hillary-r.-clinton-part-04-of-04/view (p. 56)<br /><br /> “H offers career-enhancing, Seventh Floor<br /><br /> positions in which you can have a direct, substantive<br /><br /> impact in achieving our foreign policy goals”<br /><br /> “there was a powerful group of very high ranking state officials that some referred to as ‘The 7th Floor Group’ or ‘The Shadow Government.’”<br /><br /> Obama slams 'crazy conspiracy theories' while the FBI's own docs literally say a "shadow government" protects Hillary.<br /><br /> Obama and Hillary say it is a conspiracy theory to believe in a rigged system... after saying the system is rigged. <br /><br /> They say it is a conspiracy theory to believe in voter and election fraud, yet we have video proof of high level democrats talking about how they commit voter fraud as well as voting machines changing votes from Trump to Hillary (leading to counties admitting to the "errors" and using safer paper ballots), and electronic voting machines owned by companies and elites paying Hillary Clinton money with past ties to election fraud.<br /><br /><br />33. List of reporters that Hillary wined and dined, including biggest journalists and pundits of CNN, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, NY Times, and a lot more. Off the record.<br /><br /> https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12063<br /><br /> https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10353<br /><br /> https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23958 (another dinner with 25)<br /><br /> https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26404<br /><br /> "20 reporters who will closely cover the campaign (aka the bus)"<br /><br /> "Off the record" dinner with 25 press attendees.”<br /><br /> “Hi John - I just wanted to thank you again for your hospitality last night. You were so kind to open your home to us, and the food was as fantastic as promised (everyone at the White House raves about your dinners). I really appreciated the opportunity to connect with a number of folks from Team Clinton. The evening was a great way to kick off this crazy adventure. Thank you, and I hope we'll cross paths again soon. Best, Colleen Colleen McCain Nelson The Wall Street Journal”<br /><br /> No wonder the mainstream media has been shilling so hard for Hillary.<br /><br /> The first link is the list of media personalities who went to the "off the record" private party in the personal home of John Podesta. Includes many corrupt, in-the-tank-for-Hillary journalists like John Heillman, Mark Halperin, Maggie Haberman (colluding in other emails with the Hillary campaign) and many others (Diane Sawyer, George Stephanopoulos, Mika Brzezinski, and so many more).<br /><br /> The largest amount of invitees who said yes to the private party are from the New York Times, Bloomberg, MSNBC, and CNN. Seems to nicely reflect the level of corruption and pro-Hillary bias. This is April 2015 so they were influencing journalists for a long time and their investment has clearly paid off.<br /><br />http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/<br />magiclougiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07781500694246403783noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-954029713422850507.post-34179187881768597942016-10-31T10:09:37.489-04:002016-10-31T10:09:37.489-04:00From "The Top 100 Most Damaging Wikileaks&quo...From "The Top 100 Most Damaging Wikileaks":<br /><br />19. Clinton Foundation schemed with Big Pharma: keep the price of <br /> AIDS drugs high in America and NO to cheaper generic versions<br /><br /> https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24440<br /><br /> “Since President Clinton’s comments were made, we have been contacted by a number of advocacy groups who are now intending to wage a public campaign to bring in generics and lower drug prices. We do not feel we can participate in this without jeopardizing our work around the world. We cannot oppose what they might do, but we also cannot be publicly supporting it either.”<br /><br /> “we think that publicly pressuring the US and European AIDS drug companies to lower prices and bringing pressure to allow generic AIDS drugs into the United States will have limited if any success and could seriously jeopardize our negotiations to continually lower prices in poor countries… We have always told the drug companies that we would not pressure them”<br /><br /> "We have always told the drug companies that we would not pressure them and create a slippery slope where prices they negotiate with us for poor countries would inevitably lead to similar prices in rich countries."<br /><br /> "we suggest that we approach the innovator companies that can currently sell products in the US with the idea of making donations to help clear the ADAP lists."<br /><br /> "the companies will likely favor a donation approach rather than one that erodes prices across the board. I would guess that they would also likely favor a solution that involved their drugs rather than an approach that allowed generic drugs from India to flood the US market at low prices or one that set a precedent of waiving patent laws on drugs."<br /><br /> When the Clintons are questioned about the obvious sketchiness of their foundation, they routinely cite AIDS work. But the AIDS work is carried out by CHAI ("Clinton Health Access Initiative"), a separate organization.<br /><br /> CHAI freely admits there is an implicit agreement with the drug companies not to pressure them to lower domestic prices. Bill Clinton made comments that added pressure. CHAI receives a great amount of positive publicity for their AIDS work abroad, and the comments jeopardize that program. Here, CHAI admits it is in their interests for U.S. AIDS drug prices to remain high, so that they can continue getting credit for keeping them low abroad.<br /><br /> But CHAI is not content with simply fleecing American AIDS sufferers. Since CHAI doesn't want pressure on Pharma companies to linger, they propose to torpedo other AIDS advocacy groups by creating a smaller, watered-down domestic program with the Pharma companies before those other advocacy groups begin their assault in January.<br /><br /> The Clintons are only out for themselves. In comments on World AIDS day in the subsequent years of 2012 and 2013, Bill says nothing whatsoever about domestic drug prices. If AIDS advocacy groups cannot trust the Clintons not to stab them in the back, how can the American people?<br /><br /> Also remember, the Clinton foundation only donates 5.6% of their earnings to charity, despite Hillary knowingly and blatantly lying to the American people by claiming they donated 90% at the last debate, but she is counting on you to not do research, and her mainstream media to not report it.<br /><br />http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/magiclougiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07781500694246403783noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-954029713422850507.post-41351159129755526202016-10-31T10:08:58.816-04:002016-10-31T10:08:58.816-04:00From "The Top 100 Most Damaging Wikileaks&quo...From "The Top 100 Most Damaging Wikileaks":<br /><br />18. Hillary was hateful, neglectful, above the law, “contemptuous” to <br /> her security detail, and “blatantly disregarded” security, (FBI docs)<br /><br /> https://sli.mg/a/nNCo7y<br /><br /> https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton/hillary-r.-clinton-part-04-of-04/view (p. 43-45)<br /><br /> “CLINTON frequently and “blatantly” disregarded [security and diplomatic protocols].”<br /><br /> “This frequently resulted in complaints by ambassadors who were insulted and embarrassed by this breach of protocol… CLINTON’s protocol breaches were well known throughout Diplomatic Security and were “abundant.””<br /><br /> “...ABEDIN possessed “much more power” over CLINTON’s staff and schedule than other former chiefs of staff… was often responsible for overriding security and diplomatic protocols on behalf of CLINTON.”<br /><br /> “...Clinton disregarded security and diplomatic protocols, occasionally without regard for the safety of her staff and protection detail, in order to gain favorable press.”<br /><br /> “...traveling to Palestine, CLINTON ordered the limousine driver… to open the window while in “occupied territory”, referring to a dangerous area of the West Bank. [He] initially declined to respond to CLINTON’s request; however, repeated demands by CLINTON forced him to open his window despite the danger to himself and the occupants.”<br /><br /> “CLINTON’s treatment of DS agents on her protective detail was so contemptuous that many of them sought reassignment or employment elsewhere… it was difficult to find senior agents willing to work with her.”<br /><br /> Look at the first link (highlights all the parts). Seriously, there are way too many to include in the quotes… just a sheer and utter lack of care for protocol, security, and the well being of others. This is the person who people want to be in charge of national security and classified documents.<br /><br /> Another scary note in this list is the mention of Huma Abedin, Hillary’s long time assistant, possessing “much more power” and overriding security and protocol on Hillary’s behalf. Abedin has been strongly rumored to be Hillary’s Chief of Staff should she be elected. She also has strong ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.<br /><br />http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/magiclougiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07781500694246403783noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-954029713422850507.post-9267111318351139702016-10-31T09:58:09.811-04:002016-10-31T09:58:09.811-04:00From "The Top 100 Most Damaging Wikileaks&quo...From "The Top 100 Most Damaging Wikileaks":<br /><br />12. Latinos are "needy". Latino outreach is "taco bowl engagement"<br /><br /> https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6777<br /><br /> https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/5492 <br /><br /> “Needy Latinos and 1 easy call.”<br /><br />"Attached is a script for a new video we’d like to use to mop up some more taco bowl engagement, and demonstrate the Trump actually isn’t trying."<br /><br />According to Hillary and her campaign, whites are “deplorables”, blacks are “super predators” who "need to be brought to heel", and Latinos are “needy” and the "taco bowl engagement". Such a uniter!<br /><br /><br />13. Clinton campaign was in direct communication with DOJ regarding <br /> Hillary's investigation<br /><br /> https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4178<br /><br />"DOJ folks inform me..."<br /><br />This report that Clinton’s campaign was in direct communication with the Obama Department of Justice on the email investigation shows a level of collusion which calls into question the entire investigation into her private server.<br /><br />On June 29, head of the DOJ, Attorney General Loretta Lynch met with Bill Clinton on a private plane for 30 minutes. The meeting occurred hours before the House Select Committee on Benghazi released its final report to the public. Sneaking around during an investigation with the husband of the one being investigated is highly unethical and downright shady.<br /><br />On October 28, Attorney General Lynch declined to comply with Congress regarding the secret Iran ransom payments. The top law enforcement official, The United Sates Attorney General, "declines to cooperate" with an investigation by Congress. Let that sink in.<br /><br /><br />14. Bill Clinton receives $1 million "birthday gift" from ISIS-funding <br /> Qatar while Hillary was SoS, Qatar receives arms flow increases of <br /> 1,482%<br /><br /> https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8396<br /><br /> http://www.ibtimes.com/clinton-foundation-donors-got-weapons-deals-hillary-clintons-state-department-1934187<br /><br /> “Would like to see WJC "for five minutes" in NYC, to present $1 million check that Qatar promised for WJC's birthday in 2011.”<br /><br />Just another examples of breaking the law. Also remember from earlier: Hillary KNEW that Qatar funds ISIS. Why is the country funding ISIS giving money to Bill and paying for Hillary’s campaign. What are they getting in return?<br /><br />In accordance with the Emoluments Clause of the U.S. Constitution, you may not accept anything of value from a foreign government, unless specifically authorized by Congress. This rule applies whether you are on or off duty. Any unit of a foreign government, whether it is national, state, local, or municipal level, is covered. It also applies to gifts from international or multinational organizations comprised of government representatives. It also may apply to gifts of honoraria, travel, or per diem from foreign universities, which are often considered as part of the foreign government. Spouses and dependent children of Federal employees are also banned from accepting gifts from foreign governments.<br /><br /> <br />15. Hillary campaign prays for shooters in news stories to be white<br /><br /> https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11500#searchresult<br /><br />“Damn… Better if a guy named Sayeed Farouk was reporting that a guy named Christopher Hayes was the shooter.”<br /><br />This was the San Bernardino terrorist. I'm just blank after reading that. No words.<br /><br />http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/magiclougiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07781500694246403783noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-954029713422850507.post-50759962595661943372016-10-31T09:51:30.349-04:002016-10-31T09:51:30.349-04:00From "The Top 100 Most Damaging Wikileaks&quo...From "The Top 100 Most Damaging Wikileaks":<br /><br />10. State Department tried to bribe FBI to un-classify Clinton emails *FBI docs)<br /><br /> https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton/hillary-r.-clinton-part-04-of-04/view<br /><br /> http://nypost.com/2016/10/17/state-department-brokered-deal-with-fbi-to-declassify-clinton-emails/<br /><br />“[Redacted] indicated he had been contacted by [Kennedy], Undersecretary of State, who had asked his assistance in altering the e-mail’s classification in exchange for a ‘quid pro quo,’”<br /><br />“[REDACTED] believes STATE has an agenda which involves minimizing the classified nature of the CLINTON e-mails in order to protect STATE interests and those of CLINTON,”<br /><br />"[Redacted] advised that, in exchange for marking the email unclassified, STATE would reciprocate by allowing the FBI AGENTS to place more Agents in countries where they are presently forbidden."<br /><br />1) Not only did the State Department, the undersecretary himself no less, make an attempt to bribe the FBI (to declassify several emails from Hillary Clinton’s private server)...<br /><br />2) They did it by trying to tempt the FBI into allowing them to act in sovereign nations where they are presently not allowed to operate.<br /><br />This isn't a smoking gun. This is a smoking cannon.<br /><br />I'm not sure how this does not bring the State Department to a screeching halt.<br /><br />This shows a cavalier attitude towards protecting our nation’s secrets. These are the people Hillary will hire to help run the country, knowingly offering shady and illegal deals to cover up for their corruption.<br /><br />http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/magiclougiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07781500694246403783noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-954029713422850507.post-53443019352888420512016-10-31T09:48:05.645-04:002016-10-31T09:48:05.645-04:00From "The Top 100 Most Damaging Wikileaks::
...From "The Top 100 Most Damaging Wikileaks::<br /><br />8. Hillary deleted her incriminating emails. State covered it up. Asked about using White House executive privilege to hide from Congress.<br /><br /> https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9272#efmBI2BOJ<br /><br /> https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9545<br /><br /> https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/34370<br /><br /> https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/32007<br /><br />"They do not plan to release anything publicly, so no posting online or anything public-facing, just to the committee."<br /><br />"That of course includes the emails Sid turned over that HRC didn't, which will make clear to them that she didn't have them in the first place, deleted them, or didn't turn them over. It also includes emails that HRC had that Sid didn't.”<br /><br />“Think we should hold emails to and from potus? That's the heart of his exec privilege. We could get them to ask for that. They may not care, but I seems like they will.”<br /><br />"We brought up the existence of emails in reserach this summer but were told that everything was taken care of."<br /><br />"That of course includes the emails Sid turned over that HRC didn't, which will make clear to them that she didn't have them in the first place, deleted them, or didn't turn them over."<br /><br />The State Department was:<br /><br />(1) Coordinating with the Clinton political campaign.<br /><br />(2) Colluding with the press to spin it positively.<br /><br />(3) Doing so BEFORE they released it to AN EQUAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT. The Clinton campaign was always a step ahead of the committee investigating them. Shameful.<br /><br />Nick states "Just spoke to State" He goes on to reveal that State colluded with him about which emails are being revealed to committee and that the State plans to plant a story with AP.<br /><br />Shows intent to withhold emails from the subpoena.<br /><br />http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/<br /><br />magiclougiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07781500694246403783noreply@blogger.com